The effect of employee motivation and employee engagement on job performance mediated by job satisfaction
Defri Ramadan Wardiansyah · Nur Khusniyah Indrawati · Desi Tri Kurniawati
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 1 · 220-231
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:36 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of employee motivation and employee engagement mediated by job satisfaction on job performance. This study employs explanatory research with a quantitative approach. The population in this study consisted of all employees of retail company X. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling, and the number of research samples was 150. Data was collected through surveys and documentation, and the instrument was tested using Likert scales. The data was analysed using Structural Equation Model Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) modelling. The results of this study indicate that employee motivation can increase job performance, while employee engagement cannot increase job performance. Furthermore, the findings revealed that employee motivation can increase job satisfaction while employee engagement cannot. Job satisfaction can increase job performance. Job satisfaction can mediate the effect of employee motivation on job performance, but it cannot mediate the effect of employee engagement on job performance. According to the findings of this study, Company X should be able to provide motivational stimulus to employees by increasing salaries and work incentives, as well as increasing training and developing employee skills, so that workers can work effectively and efficiently.
Keywords: {'name': 'Employee Motivation, Employee Engagement, Job Satisfaction, Job Performance.'}
Authors & affiliations
Defri Ramadan Wardiansyah
Affiliation not supplied
Nur Khusniyah Indrawati
Affiliation not supplied
Desi Tri Kurniawati
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.33215/sjom.v4i3.641
DOI: 10.22161/ijaems.76.2
Alsafadi, Y., & Altahat, S. (2021). Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Performance: The Role of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.519
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1433
Asnah, Febrianti Eka, Sabri, Antoni, & Nasfi. (2021). Organizational Culture and Motivation Toward Job Satisfaction of Bank “XYZ” Employees. International Journal Of Social and Management Studies (IJOSMAS), 03, 93–105. https://www.ijosmas.org
Aydin, B., & Ceylan, A. (2009). The effect of spiritual leadership on organizational learning capacity. African Journal of Business Management,.
DOI: 10.1177/0091026015575178
DOI: 10.4337/9781800378841.H.18
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2013.10820618
Djamarah, H. M. S. B. (2018). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Pendekatan.
Edgar, N. (2022). Public service motivation, employee engagement and job satisfaction among staff in Kampala capital city health centers [Makerere University]. http://dissertations.mak.ac.ug/handle/20.500.12281/12672
Federman, B. (2009). Employee engagement: A roadmap for creating profits, optimizing performance, and increasing loyalty. John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: 10.1186/s43093-021-00077-6
Fredrickson, B. (2009). Positivity: Groundbreaking research reveals how to embrace the hidden strength of positive emotions, overcome negativity, and thrive. Crown Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-03516-000
Gallup. (2013). How employee engagement drives growth. Social Sciences.
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM). Statistical Associates Publishing.
Gary, D. (2015). Human Resource Management.
Ghozali, I. (2020). Desain Penelitian kuantitatif & kualitatif untuk akuntansi, bisnis dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Yoga Pratama.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik, Dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 Untuk Penelitian Empiris Edisi 2. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Griffin, H. (2020). Job Satisfaction and Perceptions of Former Female Correctional Officers in an Eastern State Adult Male Medium-Security or Maximum-Security Prison Facility. https://search.proquest.com/openview/43ee2d5a844d82edeac67a9e11de5913/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Handoyo. (2018). Penentuan keputusan dan kebijakan penjualan untuk mengurangi dead stock menggunakan data mining pada toko sepeda x.
Hasibuan, P. (2007). Hubungan antara intensitas pelatihan dan komunikasi interpersonal dengan motivasi kerja karyawan operator produksi.
DOI: 10.22161/ijebm.5.2.3
Karahan, M., & Tetik, N. (2012). The Determination of the Effect Level on Employee Performance of TQM Practices with Artificial Neural Networks?: A Case Study on Manufacturing Industry Enterprises in Turkey. Journal of Business, 3(7), 133–142. https://search.proquest.com/openview/fe26b7ed0910fa5ad9af8be07b38f6bb/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=646295
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2016-0319
DOI: 10.1504/IJBPM.2018.10013739
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004
DOI: 10.4324/9780203082744
Luthan, F. (2011). Organ?zat?onal Behav?or: An Evidence-Based Approach. McGraw-Hill.
DOI: 10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.86
DOI: 10.4135/9781452231556
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1
DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-06-2017-0117
Nabilah, F. (2020). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Turnover Intentions Karyawan Di Kantor Pusat PT Asuransi Tri Pakarta Jakarta. Business Social Sciences.
DOI: 10.24874/IJQR13.01-12
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073670
DOI: 10.26740/jim.v9n3.p1092-1100
Pabundu. (2014). Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan.
DOI: 10.37950/ijd.v4i1.188
DOI: 10.31955/mea.v6i3.2501
Qureshi, M., … K. H. A. R. in B. and, & 2017, undefined. (2017). Impact of supervisor support on job satisfaction: A moderating role of fairness perception. Researchgate.Net. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2729
Rayadi. (2012). Faktor Sumber Daya Manusia yang Meningkatkan KinerjaKaryawan dan Perusahaan di Kalbar. Jurnal EKSOS. Vol.8 No.2.Pontianak: AMIK Panca Bhakti.
DOI: 10.1108/JMP-07-2018-0299
Rivai, V. (2005). Performance Appraisal: Sistem yang tepat untuk menilai kinerja karyawan dan meningkatkan daya saing perusahaan. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior, Seventeenth Edition, Global Edition. Pearson Education Limited, 747.
DOI: 10.1002/9781118977620.ch18
DOI: 10.35313/ijabr.v4i1.208
DOI: 10.46961/jip.v2i2.127
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-021-10062-w
DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v4i3.789
Tamrin, A. P. (2021). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja dan Employee Engagement Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pada Karyawan PT . Arthaasia Finance. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 12(1), 47–54.
Tjiptono, F., & Diana. (2001). Total Quality Management. Andi Offset.
DOI: 10.17358/jabm.7.2.262
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.1.1268
DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2018.1512872
DOI: 10.1177/0748175612440286