Non-life insurance: The state of the art of determining the superior method for pricing automobile insurance premiums using archival technique
Sandile Johannes Buthelezi ORCID ↗ · Taurai Hungwe ORCID ↗ · Solly Matshonisa Seeletse ORCID ↗ · Vimbai Mbirimi-Hungwe ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 2 · 180-188
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:53 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The pricing of insurance premiums in the non-life insurance sector remains a challenging and complex task. It demands a delicate balance between accurately estimating risk exposure and ensuring profitability for insurers. Generalised Linear Regression Models (GLMs) have become the preferred methods for premium price modelling in the motor insurance sector. While the approach of using a single superior model on which predictions are based ignores the use of robust estimator models. This paper examines various methodologies and sheds light on superiority of twenty-two models compared to each other for pricing automobile insurance. These methods vary from traditional actuarial methods to the modern statistical models such as machine learning algorithms. By using archival technique, their inferiority and superiority are explored, considering the ever-changing landscape of risk factors and market dynamics. Furthermore, it highlights the potential benefits of leveraging these methods and the mechanism for pricing short-term insurance, particularly in motor vehicle insurance. It also develops a framework that can be used in pricing to cater to risk analysis constituents to mitigate uncertainties and provide good services to clients. Our findings show that ANN, NN, XGB, random forest (RF) are superior models, and we conclude that the modern statistical methods can accurately estimate the risk exposure as compared to traditional methods such as the GLMs.
Keywords: {'name': 'Archival technique, Automobile Insurance, Insurance Premium, Non-life insurance, Superior method'}
Authors & affiliations
Sandile Johannes Buthelezi
Affiliation not supplied
Taurai Hungwe
Affiliation not supplied
Solly Matshonisa Seeletse
Affiliation not supplied
Vimbai Mbirimi-Hungwe
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Baran, S. and Rola, P., 2022. Prediction of motor insurance claims occurrence as an imbalanced machine learning problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06109.
DOI: 10.1201/9780429027192
DOI: 10.1017/S1748499518000349
DOI: 10.1002/9780470517420
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2021.1951296
DOI: 10.1111/insr.12066
DOI: 10.3982/ECTA19021
DOI: 10.1080/24709360.2019.1618653
DOI: 10.1057/s41288-021-00249-z
DOI: 10.1002/sta4.180
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70998-5
DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462020383
DOI: 10.3390/su14031269
DOI: 10.1017/asb.2021.35
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10791-7
DOI: 10.58425/jsmc.v1i1.123
DOI: 10.1201/9781003168881
DOI: 10.3844/jmssp.2012.49.56
DOI: 10.3844/jmssp.2012.49.56
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.033
DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2019-032
DOI: 10.1002/9781405164061.ch35
DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12283
DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12283
DOI: 10.3390/ijfs6040084
DOI: 10.3390/risks10100194
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6616121