The influence of informal structures on corporate strategy: An African perspective
Arthur Kadakure ORCID ↗ · Michael Twum-Darko ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 2 · 13-22
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed exploration of the Afrocentric epistemological perspective of socio-cultural constructs that drive the influence of informal structures on corporate strategy and employees. The research focuses on the African context, which has a dearth of studies despite ample research exploring informal structures in Western and Asian socio-ecological contexts. To achieve this, the study employed a systematic literature review through the aid of NVivo 14 and ChatGPT, a language generation model. NVivo 14 provided the study with a tool to manage and analyze the data, and ChatGPT offered a dialogical string that created a clear path for critical analysis. The paper adopted a systematic literature review approach to investigate the origin of the concept of informal structures and their impact on corporate strategy in an Afrocentric context. The findings indicate that informal structures can have a positive influence by facilitating the flow of information, flexibility, and fulfilling social needs and shared values. However, the negative influence of informal structures, including resistance to corporate strategy, social fragmentation, conflict, and political discord, outweighs the positive influence. The study also reveals that there is limited research on the social-ecological context of Africa and its impact on corporate strategy. The paper addresses a contextual gap in the body of knowledge through its contribution that focuses specifically on the Afrocentric context. The research also sheds light on the need for more studies on the social-ecological context of Africa to gain a better understanding of its impact on corporate strategy. Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive and detailed exploration of the Afrocentric perspective of informal structures and their impact on corporate strategy and employees.
Keywords: {'name': 'Informal Structures, Corporate Strategy, Afrocentric context, Organisational structure, Contextual gap'}
Authors & affiliations
Arthur Kadakure
Affiliation not supplied
Michael Twum-Darko
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.15406/oajs.2020.04.00162
Adom, D., Hussain, E. K., & Joe, A. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework?: mandatory ingredients theoretical and conceptual framework?: mandatory ingredients Engineering Dickson Adom * Emad Kamil Hussein. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 93–98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication
DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v5.n3.267
Akpor-Robaro, M., & Omoyele, O. S. (2019). Developing African Management Theories?: Problems and Solutions. Covenant Journal of Business & Social Sciences, 10(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.20370/zwex-gt44
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4312358
DOI: 10.1177/01492063221088235
DOI: 10.2196/preprints.26931
DOI: 10.12959/issn.1855-0541.IIASS-2015-no1-art09
DOI: 10.1177/2631787720902473
DOI: 10.4324/9781315149783
DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1547708
DOI: 10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational Complexity Kevin Dooley Arizona State University. In Business (Issue January 2002, pp. 5013–5022).
DOI: 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100070
DOI: 10.1177/1609406921993276
DOI: 10.3390/su11236769
Gulbrandsen, M. (2015). Research Quality and Organisational Factors?: An Investigation of the Relationship (Issue January 2000). Norwegian university of Science and Technology.
DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2021.114623
Kavale, S. (2012). The Connection Between Strategy and Structure. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 1(6), 59–70.
DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.169
DOI: 10.46658/JBIRM-17-02
DOI: 10.1044/cicsd_33_S_21
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
DOI: 10.4172/2162-6359.1000520
Morrison, R., & Nolan, T. (2007). Too Much of a Good Thing?: Difficulties with Workplace Friendships. University of Auckland Business Review, 9(2), 32.
DOI: 10.2307/524530
DOI: 10.1080/23322373.2015.994419
DOI: 10.4324/9780203109106
Oghojafor, B. E. A., Muo, F. I., & Aduloju, S. A. (2012). Organisational Effectiveness: Whom and What Do We Believe? Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 2(4), 81–108. http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/1314732437?accountid=27965%5Cnhttp://wv9lq5ld3p.search.serialssolutions.com.library.capella.edu/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ:abiglobal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:
Pasick, R. J., Burke, N. J., Yang, C., Tang, D., & Barker, J. C. (2000). Patient-Specific Carotid Plaque Progression Simulation. Cmes-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 1(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.021.Secreted
DOI: 10.48189/nl.2020.v01i2.017
DOI: 10.14786/flr.v3i3.147
DOI: 10.1108/09696471011008260
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9735-z
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muab003
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X17723971