CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

The influence of society’s perception, social networking and social impact measurement on access to finance of social enterprises: Perspective of eThekwini Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Emmanuel Akoh

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 3 · 270-282

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS0

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations0Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the influence of society’s perception, social networking and social impact measurement on access to finance for social enterprises’ activities. It broadens the theoretical understanding from the perspective of resource dependence theory. The study tested hypotheses to asertain the impact of society’s perception, social networking and social impact measurement on access to finance that enhances social enterprises’ activities.  A quantitative research approach was adopted, using a snowball sampling technique to identify 90 owners/managers of social enterprises from three communities in the KwaZulu-Natal province. The data was examined with Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling. The study revealed that social impact measurement has a positive, but statistically insignificant impact on access to finance; there is a positive and statistically significant impact of social networking on access to finance; also, society’s perception has a positive and statistically significant impact on access to finance. The result does not support the moderation effect of society’s perception on social networking and access to finance. Therefore, this study recommends that government educate the society on the importance of social entreprise activities in KZN communities, which will enhance members of the societys’ willingness to provide financial assistance. In addition, there should be great emphasis on social networking among social enterprises as it provides crucial platforms to share relevant information on access to finance, which is essential in addressing sociatal challenges.

Keywords: {'name': 'society’s perception'}, {'name': 'Social networking'}, {'name': 'Social impact measurement'}, {'name': 'Social enterprises'}, {'name': 'KwaZulu-Natal province'}

Authors & affiliations

Emmanuel Akoh
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163

Afthanorham, W. M. A. B. W. (2013). A comparison of partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 2(5), 198-205.

DOI: 10.51415/10321/4826

DOI: 10.21511/ppm.20(4).2022.15

Akoh, E. I., & Lekhanya, L. M. (2023). Social impact measurement challenges: The effects on social entrepreneurs’ activities in township communities in South Africa. The Seybold Report Journal, 18(12), 624-643. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10389493.

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2137228

DOI: 10.24312/paradigms100101

DOI: 10.31106/jema.v17i1.5539

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-267

DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2017.1306690

DOI: 10.12776/qip.v24i3.1463

B?anda, J., & Urban?íková, N. (2021). Perceptions and attitudes of young people towards social entrepreneurship. Management and Research and Practice, 13(2), 5-14.

British Council. (2020). Creative and social enterprise in South Africa. Available at: https://www.britishcouncil.org.za/sites/default/files/surveying_creative_and_social_enterprise_in_sa.pdf. [Accessed February 6, 2024].

Buckland, L. and Hehenberger, L. (2021). Measuring social impact can help foster a stronger European social economy. Available at: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/measuring_social_impact_can_help_foster_a_stronger_european_social_economy [Accessed February 24, 2024].

DOI: 10.3390/su12083149

Byrd, K., Ross, L., & Glackin, C. (2013). A preliminary casual analysis of small business access to credit during economic expansion and contraction. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 3(5), 77-84. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2690640.

DOI: 10.1177/1094428110392383

Chinyoka, S. (2020). The effects of resource dependence and resource-based theories on bricolage in social enterprises. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 4(01), 85-95.

DOI: 10.3390/su12072720

Chong, P., & Kleemann, L. (2011). The future of funding for social enterprises, Kiel Policy Brief, No. 34, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kiel.

Clifford, J., Markey, K., & Malpani, N. (2013). Measuring social impact in social enterprise: The state of thoughts and practice in the UK. E3M. pp. 1-48.

DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-07-2023-3886

Dees, G. J., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social enterpreneurship: Building on two school of practice and thought. Research on Social Enterpreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field, 1(3), 39-66.

DOI: 10.1108/17508610810922703

Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative perspective. WP No 12/3. Available at: https://emes.net/content/uploads/publications/EMES-WP-12-03_Defourny-Nyssens.pdf. [Accessed February 28, 2024].

Department of Social Development (DSD). (2020). NPO roles and responsibility in poverty alleviation, employment creation, service and community empowerment. Available at: https://www.dsd.gov.za/index.php/component/search/?searchword=number%20of%20registered%20npo%20in%20kzn&ordering=newest&searchphrase=any&limit=50. [Accessed February 07, 2024].

Dzomonda, O. (2021). Demystifying the challenges faced by social entrepreneurs in pursuit of their social mission in South Africa. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal (AEJ), 27(4), 1-17.

DOI: 10.3390/su151511935

DOI: 10.3390/su12030826

Fernandez, T., Godwin, A., Doyle, J., Verdin, D. & Boone, H. (2016). More comprehensive and inclusive approaches to demographic data collection. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1059&context=enegs. [Accessed February 17, 2024].

DOI: 10.2307/3150980

DOI: 10.1108/IMR-09-2013-0196

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2019). Global report 2019/2020. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2019-2020-global-report. [Accessed February 20, 2024].

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2022). Global report 2021/2022. Opportunity amid disruption. Available at: https://gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50900. [Accessed February 25, 2024].

Gonul, O. O., & Senyuva, Z. (2020). How social entrepreneurs can create impact for a better world. Available at: https://eiexchange.com/content/how-social-entrepreneurs-can-create-impact-for-a-better-world. [Accessed February 3, 2024].

Gordon Institute of Business Sciences (GIBS). (2018). Social enterprises in South Africa. Discovering a vibrant sector. SSESA reports with case studies.

DOI: 10.1108/17508611211226557

DOI: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

DOI: 10.1111/joes.12290

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2016). Access to finance for social entrepreneurs in South Africa: A scoping study. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---africa/---ro-abidjan/---ilo-pretoria/documents/publication/wcms_474847.pdf. [Accessed February 19, 2024].

DOI: 10.1177/0972150919868867

DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2021.1995030

Katz, R. A., & Page, A. (2010). The role of social enterprise. Vermont Law Review, 1(35), 59-103.

DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-00081-5

DOI: 10.1177/0007650315613293

Lyon, F., & Baldock, R. (2014). Financing social ventures and demand for social investment. Third Sector Research Centre. Working Paper 124.

DOI: 10.1111/puar.12181

Maphalla, S. T., Nieuwenhuizen, C., & Roberts, R. (2009). Perceived barriers experienced by township small, micro and medium enterprise entrepreneurs in Mamelodi. [Business management thesis]. University of Johannesburg.

Mary, A. I. V., Anthuvan, M. V. L., & Christie. P. (2019). Networking for social enterprises: A quintessential aspect. International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences, 9(01), 122-128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.002

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.003

DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00738-0

DOI: 10.1002/cjas.1359

DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2008-1-2-9

DOI: 10.1787/77a15208-en

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Policy brief on social impact measurement for social enterprise. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/social/PB-SIM-Web_FINAL.pdf. [Accessed February 1, 2024].

DOI: 10.1177/00076503221120568

Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowballing sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/211022791.pdf. [Accessed February 21, 2024].

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2015). External control of organisations – Resource dependence perspective. In Organisational Behaviour. 2: 373-388. Routledge.

DOI: 10.1177/1042258717727718

DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12310

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.701181

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968484

DOI: 10.3390/su15129411

Urban, B. (2015). The influence of institutional perceptions on social enterprise outcomes: a South African perspective. Journal of Contemporary Management. 12: 638-663.

Urmanaviciene, A., & Mendis, K. D. (2021). Social impact investment as a tool for funding social enterprises. Silesian University of Technology Publishing House. Organisation and Management Series No. 151. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2021.151.48.

Watters, K., Willington, L., Shutte, T. & Kruh, R. (2012). Social entrepreneurship–Individuals with vision hold unlimited potential to alleviate poverty: The UnLtd South Africa model. Towards Carnegie III. Conference Paper. 1-12.

Zait, A., & Bertea, P. S P. E. (2011). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing Journal. 9(2): 217-224.