CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJBESPUBLICATION RECORD

Factors influencing institutionalisation of change management practice in government departments

Theresha Hanekom ORCID ↗ · Michael Twum-Darko ORCID ↗ · Arthur Kadakure ORCID ↗

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 6 · 102-108

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This paper explored factors for infusing change management practices in the public sector and gave recommendations for policy execution of technology. The Western Cape Department of Community Safety (DoCS) launched the Expanded Partnership Programme (EPP) in 2010, as provided for in section 206 of the Constitution to reorient social crime prevention by Community Policing Forums Educate and Share towards Monitoring Guided Actions to increase sustainability, the efficiency of Community Police Forums (CPFs), and the accountability of the police. Even with an investment of R18 million, participation levels were still low and there was no service delivery improvement by the police, thus the need for a change management was borne. The study pointed out the need of strategic methods such as Kotter’s 8-Step Process, Prosci ADKAR, and McKinsey Influence Model to implement institutionalised changes. The research pursued a practical stance and therefore merged objectivist and constructivist positions with an abductive approach. Count data were collected through the use of a Likert scale questionnaire since it was quantitative in nature while qualitative data was obtained from semi-structured focus group discussions. Data analysis was performed using qualitative and quantitative methods such as descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-square, and content analysis, among others. The research findings highlighted key factors such as organizational culture, interests of stakeholders, politics, resources, and the external environment a determinants of change management. The creation of detailed guidelines that are supported by evidence to direct decision making, resource allocation and prioritisation of policies by the government was advocated for in the study. These findings closed the loop between the research academic domain and the practical field, and demonstrated clear steps towards improving accountability, transparency and adequacy of change implementation.

Keywords: {'name': 'Change management, implementation, Ggovernment, sustainability, policy '}

Authors & affiliations

Theresha Hanekom
Affiliation not supplied

Michael Twum-Darko
Affiliation not supplied

Arthur Kadakure
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.20319/pijss.2018.42.609618

Bakari, H., Hunjra, A. I., & Masood, M. T. (2017). Managing organisational change in Pakistan: Insights from the work of Kurt Lewin. UW Journal of Management Sciences, 1(1), 53-64.

Baker, D. (2007). Strategic change management in public sector organisations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Bahner, R., & Stroh, L. (2004). The transformation management model: A total evaluation route to business change success. Problems and Perspectives in Management, (4), 180-191.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. London: Kogan Page.

DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2014). Organisation development and change. Cengage learning.

DOI: 10.7441/joc.2017.04.01

Eisenstat, R., Spector, B., & Beer, M. (1990). Why change programs don’t produce change. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 158-166.

DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Hiatt, J., & Creasey, T. (2012). Change management: The people side of change. Prosci.

Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.

Kotter, J., & Cohen, D. S. (2012). The heart of change: Real-life stories of how people change their organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Kumandang, C., Ruslaini, R., Santoso, S., & Rizal, M. (2022). Optimizing organizational performance: Exploring the integration of AI and HR practices. In The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST), 1(2), 269-277.

Lueg, R., & Vuori, V. (2020). Transformation management: Methodologies and frameworks for guiding change. Journal of Change Management, 20(3), 245-263.

Morgan, J. (1921). Managing change: Strategies of making change work for you. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

DOI: 10.4135/9781412984287

Neill, M. (2018). Change management communication: Barriers, strategies and messaging. Public Relations Journal, 12(1), 1-26.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9

DOI: 10.2307/3250927

DOI: 10.4324/9780203826461

DOI: 10.1007/s11528-022-00775-0

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

DOI: 10.4018/IJPADA.20201001.oa4

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. 8th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson.

Sawitri, H., & Wahyuni, S. (2018). Readiness to change in the public sector. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(1), 259-267.

Schein, E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1296488

Smith, J. (2017). Managing change: Strategies for success. Publisher X.

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.

Vogt, W., Gardner, D., & Haeffele, L. (2012). When to use what research design. New York: Guilford Press.

Welch, M. (2011). HRM work and employment relations in the English NHS: On navigating through the fog. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(2), 106-123.

Western Cape Department of Community Safety. (2015). The implementation evaluation of the expanded partnership programme: Full evaluation report. Creative Consultants & Development Works.