Are perceptions of organizational communication color-blind?

Abstract

With the global trend to prioritize tailoring communication strategies to meet the ever-changing diverse workforce, the study reveals a more nuanced reality.  While much focus is placed on addressing communication differences, this papers position is that not enough focus is on our basic human need to communicate. This paper aims to evaluate whether certain aspects of the flow of information and communication are racially shared perceptions. Furthermore, through a Chaos Theory lens, evaluate the influence of managerial and organizational control mechanisms on various internal communication perceptions. A quantitative method was adopted, and data was collected from 63 non-management respondents in an automotive group in Kwa-Zulu Natal, by a closed-ended 5-point Likert scale. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to identify racially shared and divergent perceptions of organizational communication and the statistically significance.  Key findings conclude that the free and accurate flow of information is a shared perception, regardless of race, and thus, a basic human need.  Furthermore, the study demonstrates the significant influence managerial and organizational control mechanisms have on aspects of organizational communication, and challenges current academic positions that similar race dyads experience higher levels of trust.  Finally, the paper concludes that the significant negative perception to control mechanisms, such as informal idea-sharing processes, flexible communication between levels, and active participation in SOPs and policy development, is a racially shared perception.

Keywords: {'name': 'Communication'}, {'name': 'Human and organizational factors'}, {'name': 'board gender diversity'}

Authors & affiliations

Yachal Du Plessis
Affiliation not supplied

Veena Parboo Rawjee
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1177/1046496410377359

Adler, R. B. (2017). Understanding human communication (13th ed.) Oxford University Press https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=cat09081a&AN=dutc.oai.edge.durban.folio.ebsco.com.fs00001076.a2c885ba

DOI: 10.1023/A:1007521608402

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2019-4030

DOI: 10.1007/s10270-019-00767-4

Deloitte. (2021). The social enterprise in a world disrupted: Leading the shift from survive to thrive - 2021 Deloitte South Africa human capital trends https://www.deloitte.com/za/en/services/consulting/analysis/deloitte-south-africa-human-capital-trends-report-2021.html

Deloitte. (2022). The journey to 2030: Choosing the human agenda https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/human-capital/articles/journey-to-2030-seven-shifts-reshaping-organizations.html

Flower, J. (1993). The power of chaos Health Forum Journal, 36(5), 48

Frank, A., & Brownell, J. (1989). Organizational communication and behavior: Communicating to improve performance Holt, Rinehart and Winston

DOI: 10.1002/cpp.388

Griffin, D. (2022). The effects of a tall organizational structure https://smallbusiness.chron.com/effects-tall-organizational-structure-287.html

DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2000.10779003

Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organising universe Pergamon Press

DOI: 10.1007/BF00289993

Kaye, D. U. N. S.-G. U. N. H. R. C. S. R. o. t. P. a. P. o. t. R. t. F. o. O. a. E. (2017). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression: Note by the Secretary-General United Nations https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Opinion/A.66.290.pdf

DOI: 10.4324/9781315714424

DOI: 10.2146/ajhp170657

Langosco, M. (2012). Dealing with the edge of chaos using emotional, cultural, and spiritual intelligence PMI® Global Congress 2012

DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250151011

DOI: 10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v10i05/49976

DOI: 10.1177/0091026020977565

DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1428687

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00212-0

DOI: 10.1080/10510979609368473

DOI: 10.4135/9781483345321

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3434075

Ruck, K., & Yaxley, H. (2013). Tracking the rise and rise of internal communication from the 1980s

Siegle, D. (2021). Purposive sampling https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/purposive-sampling

Silungwe, W. (2014). Communication across cultures and its implications: The case of Black Indigenous Zambians and White Western migrants living in Zambia University of South Africa http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/19032/dissertation_silungwe_w.pdf

Singh, H., & Singh, A. (2002). Principles of complexity and chaos theory in project execution: A new approach to management Cost Engineering, 44(12), 23–32 https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/principles-complexity-chaos-theory-project/docview/220447111

DOI: 10.4324/9781003016366

Twente, U. o. (2003). Communication theories University of Twente https://www.utwente.nl/.uc/f9986009501022125cb01d5e2e5030c0add13d6eed6e400/Communication%20Theories%20University%20of%20Twente.pdf

UNESCO. (2009). The 2009 UNESCO Framework for Cultural Statistics (FCS) https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/doc10/BG-FCS-E.pdf

Van Tonder, C. (2004). Organisational change: Theory and practice Van Schaik

Van Cuilenburg, J. J., O, S., & G. W., N. (1998). Communication science Humanitas Publishing House

DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.017

Wells, C. V. (2001). Trust, gender, and race in the workplace Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 115–126

Wheatley, M. (1993). Chaos and complexity: What can science teach? Madison Big Learning Event, University of Wisconsin

Wheatley, M. J. (1994). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organizations from an orderly universe Berrett-Koehler Publishers

DOI: 10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.93