Revisiting the January effect anomaly: evidence from international stock markets
Samuel Tabot Enow
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 4 · 245-251
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
A recurring theme in the literature and discussion of stock market analysis is the concept of the January effect which essentially implies buy in December and sell in January. The January effect is based on the perceived seasonality trend where short term investors hope to take advantage of the arbitrage opportunity between December and January. However, this perceived anomaly continues is seen as a myth and has been strongly rejected by many market participants in the current dispensation. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the January effect in the Nikkei 225, JSE, CAC 40, DAX, and the NASDAQ Index from February 2019 to February 2024. A F-test statistics was used to explore the phenomenon. The findings indicated that there is no significant difference between the realised returns in January and those of the other month for the most recent five years. This led to the conclusion that, while the January effect may have been observed, it is no longer evident in financial markets, hence market participants should avoid using this type of arbitrage approach because it may result in massive losses
Keywords: {'name': 'January effect, financial markets, F-statistics test; Efficiency Market Hypothesis'}
Authors & affiliations
Samuel Tabot Enow
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0086
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2023.2239032
Anderson, L.R., Gerlach, J.R., & Ditraglia, F.J. (2005). Yes, Wall Street, There Is a January Effect. College of William and Mary working papers. (WP15).
DOI: 10.1080/17446540600706817
Chen, J. (2024). January Effect: What It Is in the Stock Market, Possible Causes. Available at < January Effect: What It Is in the Stock Market, Possible Causes > Retrieved on 14-03-2024.
DOI: 10.3390/risks9080149
Dom, R. & Miller, M. (2018). Reforming tax systems in the developing world: What can we learn from the past? ODI Report, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London.
Enescu, A.G. (2022). Assessment of day-of-the-week effect and other stock market anomalies: Romanian evidence. Journal of Smart Economic Growth,7(3), 1-12.
DOI: 10.25103/ijbesar.153.04
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.13752
DOI: 10.21533/pen.v7i1.212
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v21.n5.55
DOI: 10.15294/jdm.v10i2.20620
DOI: 10.1016/j.iimb.2022.04.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.053
Kartini, K., & Nahda, K. (2021). Behavioral biases on investment decision: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics & Business, 8(3), 1231–1240
Nisar, S., Asif, R., & Ali, A. (2021). Testing the Presence of the January Effect in Developed Economies. Munich Personal Achive. Online (Testing the Presence of the January Effect in Developed Economies Munich Personal RePEc Archive (uni-muenchen.de)
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v32i1.9540
DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v9n1p50
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.10928