Labouring on a journey in conceptualising a needs-based induction (NBI) programme: An Autoethnographic reflections and experiences

Abstract

This autoethnographic (AE) paper draws directly from a national collaborative project called the New Academics Transitioning into Higher Education Project (NATHEP), which is funded by the University Capacity Development Grant (UCDG). We adopted evocative and narrative AE methodology to confront, interrogate, and uncover our own biases, assumptions, and preconceptions of induction before NATHEP, how it is now, and how it should be understood and conducted after being part of the NATHEP project. Our AE showcases our critical and reflective thoughts on the learning acquired throughout the journey, consciously and intentionally asking ourselves whether the NATHEP journey was worth it and how it benefitted the induction programme we conceptualised and implemented. Through a combined autoethnography study design and technique, we were able to gather qualitative data from the two of us and present it as written reflective narratives. Together, we developed an open-ended questionnaire in which we asked questions that sought to elicit our experiences throughout the journey as a way of reflecting on the overall learning acquired by being part of the NATHEP project. Our responses and narratives are reflectively and thematically analysed to make sense of how we interpret our eventful NATHEP journey thus far. We conclude and submit that this paper has implications for academic development practice and academic developers who aspire to be reflective practitioners, constantly reflecting on their practices to dismantle and disrupt cultural tendencies in their quest to transform their context of work and induction practices.

Keywords: {'name': 'New academics; needs-based induction; rural-based comprehensive university; transitioning;'}

Authors & affiliations

Fhatuwani Ravhuhali
Affiliation not supplied

Hlayisani Fredah Mboweni
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Behari-Leak, K. (2018). Participation in National Collaborative Project Under the University Capacity Development Programme (UCDP): New Academics’ Transitions into Higher Education. A Welcome Pack. University of Cape Town.

Bovill, C. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: challenges and opportunities. From:https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engaging-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-challenges-and-opportunities. Accessed on the 2021/10/29.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00279.x

DOI: 10.20853/30-6-732

DOI: 10.4324/9781315433370

Chang, H. (2016). Individual and collaborative Autoethnography as Method: A Social Scientist’s perspective, in Handbook of Autoethnography Edited by Stacy Holman Jones; Tony E. Adams; and Carolyn Ellis,107-122 (Chapter 3), London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group

Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651–679). London: Sage.

DOI: 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790

DOI: 10.1108/S2055-364120190000016004

DOI: 10.1108/S1479-3628_2014_0000012015

Delamont, S. (2007).‘Arguments against Auto-Ethnography’, Qualitative Researcher, Issue 4 pp. 2-4. February 2007 ISSN 1748-7315

Denejkina, Anna (2017). Exo-Autoethnography: An Introduction [44 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), Art. 13,

http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.3.2754.

Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston: D. C. Health

DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1136279

Ellis, C., & Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.733-769). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fredericks, I. (2021). Disrupting the status quo, Wednesday, 03 November 2021. https://www.cput.ac.za/newsroom/news/article/4360/disrupting-the-status-quo. Accessed on the 05/11/2021.

DOI: 10.1017/9780511820076.010

DOI: 10.4324/9780203986561

DOI: 10.14426/cristal.v9iSI.336

DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2018.1496516

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

DOI: 10.1080/13601440701217287

Matthews, K.E. (2016). Students as Partners as the Future of Student Engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1),1-5.

Mbembe, A. (2015). “Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive. Africa is a Country” contributed by Angela Okune, Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, last modified 14 August 2018. https://worldpece.org/content/mbembe-achille-2015-%E2%80%9Cdecolonizing-knowledge-and-question-archive%E2%80%9D-africa-country .

NATHEP UCDG Proposal (2018). University Capacity Development Programme Implementation Plan 2018-2020 Collaboration Project.

DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2013.879719

Ravhuhali, F. & Mboweni-Pataka, H.F(2022). Needs-Based Induction (NBI) Programme For New Academics At The University Of Venda (Univen NATHEP Case Study 2023, Unpublished).

Ravhuhali, F., Masehela, L. M., Mutshaeni, H. N., & Pataka, H. M. (2020). Students’ evaluation Of Teaching as a Reflective Tool for Lecturers ’Teaching Practices in The Era of Transformation. Gender & Behaviour, 18(1):14689-14703.

DOI: 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3628

Sophia, A., & Stein, G. (2020). Ask Your Students: The Value of Student Input on Online Course Design. Center for Engaged Learning (blog), September 7, 2020. https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/ask-your-students-the-value-of-student-input-on-online-course-design.

DOI: 10.1086/jar.47.1.3630581

DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2012.647757

DOI: 10.1177/019263650408863804