Navigating informal business institutions in Africa: Expatriates’ response to the ‘magendo’ phenomenon in Uganda

Abstract

This paper explores how expatriates deal with host country informal business practices that differ from their home country institutional frameworks. We note that expatriate business people working in emerging markets of Africa often contend with corrupt business practices rooted in local informal institutions and the lack of strong formal institutions regulating business practices. We also observe that while local people take informal institutions such as magendo, as a way of life and adjust to them, expatriates being ‘outsiders’ respond in different ways. The study employed a qualitative phenomenological design that involved in-depth interview of a small sample of expatriates operating in Uganda. For data analysis, NVivo 11 was used to search for and retrieve chunks of labelled data. The key findings indicate that expatriates from countries with strong formal institutions experience the most frustrations and often reject informal business practices. On the other hand, expatriates from countries with weak institutions are more pragmatic and easily adapt to existing practices in the new environments. Multinationals however, often reject informal business practices due to their market power and strict codes of conduct.The study recommends that small-medium category expatriates targeting Africa need to align with influential local people so as to navigate business informalities that characterise informal business environments.

Keywords: {'name': 'Magendo'}, {'name': 'informal'}, {'name': 'expatriate'}, {'name': 'Uganda'}

Authors & affiliations

Matthias Sebuttemba Mulumba
Affiliation not supplied

Ahmad Walugemba
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Arrindell, W. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations: Geert Hofstede, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2001.Pergamon.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.03.007

Barbour, R.S., & Schostak, J.(2003). Interviewing and focus groups. Research Methods in the Social Sciences,1, 41-48.

DOI: 10.1108/03090560310495357

Bempechat, J., Ronfard, S., Li, J., Mirny, A., & Holloway, S. D. (2013). "She always gives grades lower than one deserves: A qualitative study of Ruassian adolescents' perception of faireness in the classroom" Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 7(4).

DOI: 10.2307/3773133

DOI: 10.1016/0263-2373(94)90005-1

Browne, K. E. (2004). Creole economics: Caribbean cunning under the French flag: University of Texas Press.

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2490-3

Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods: Oxford university press.

DOI: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.5.27

Cadsby, B., & Bi, Y. (2007). Trust, reciprocity and guanxi in China: An experimental investigation.

Chang, S.-F. (2012). Field, Guanxi, and hidden transcripts- An alternative theoretical framework for the study of TV work practices in China. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(2), 499.

Chen. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies. Wiego working paper(1).

DOI: 10.1075/aios.9

Decker, A. (2010). Idi Amin's Dirty War: Subversion, Sabotage, and the Battle to Keep Uganda Clean, 1971-1979. The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 43(3), 489-513.

DOI: 10.1080/095851900339873

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Qualitative research. A handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed.) Sage Publications.

Dias, S. M., & Alves, F. C. G. (2008). Integration of the informal recycling sector in solid waste management in Brazil. Study Prepared For GIZ’s Sector Project “Promotion Of Concepts For Pro-Poor And Environmentally Friendly Closed-Loop Approaches In Solid Waste Management.” Available at www. GIZ. de.

Dowling, P. (2008). International human resource management: Managing people in a multinational context: Cengage Learning.

DOI: 10.1108/S1571-5027(2012)0000025011

DOI: 10.1155/2016/3824350

DOI: 10.1080/01436599913668

Garcia-Bolivar, O. E. (2006). Informal economy: is it a problem, a solution or both? The perspective of the informal business. Bepress Legal Series, 1065.

DOI: 10.1017/mor.2015.7

DOI: 10.1177/1094428112452151

DOI: 10.5465/19416520.2011.585818

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499579

DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.02.004

DOI: 10.1086/jar.42.3.3630033

DOI: 10.1108/17511061111121416

DOI: 10.1177/160940690400300104

DOI: 10.1093/0199204764.001.0001

DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21681

Henning, P. J. (2001). Public corruption: A comparative analysis of international corruption conventions and United States law. Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 18, 793.

DOI: 10.1515/9781400852321

DOI: 10.1023/A:1008846618880

DOI: 10.1017/S1744137415000120

DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879

DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Hofstede, G. H., & Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations: Sage.

DOI: 10.1007/s10490-007-9049-0

DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.01.006

DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12167

DOI: 10.1177/0170840605057666

Kelly, C. (2000). Self-Interested Giving: Bribery and Etiquette in Late Imperial Russia. In Stephen Lovel, Alenava Ledinavo and A. Raganhevaskii(eds). Bribery in Russia: Negotiating Reciprocity From the Middle Ages to the 1990s. St Martin Press.

Kimemia, D. (2018). Multinational corporations as supplier of corruption in Africa. Africa Insight, 48(2), 25-40.

Ledeneva, A. (2000). Continuity and change of blat practices in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. Macmillan.

DOI: 10.1017/S0010417508000078

DOI: 10.1353/sor.2009.0052

DOI: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557

DOI: 10.1057/9781137319159

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226498096.001.0001

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511730368

Marshall. (2014). Designing qualitative research: Sage publications.

Mertz, E., Njogu, W., & Gooding, S. (1998). What difference does difference make? The challenge for legal education. Journal of Legal Education, 48(1), 1-87.

Neuman, L. W. (2002). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Ng, K, & Hase, S.(2008). Grounded suggestions for doing a gounded theory business research. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(2).

DOI: 10.1177/1470595816671149

Pine, R. (2000). Definition of ‘expatriate’. Encyclopedia of Tourism. Routledge, London, 214-215.

DOI: 10.18356/68a70e5c-en

Rarick, C., Winter, G., Nickerson, I., Falk, G., Barczyk, C., & Asea, P. K. (2013). An investigation of Ugandan cultural values and implications for managerial behavior. Global Journal of Management And Business Research, 13(9), 1-10.

Rohwer, A. (2009). Measuring corruption: A comparison between the transparency international's corruption perceptions index and the world bank's worldwide governance indicators. Vol 7 ISS, 3 PP 42-52. University of Munich.

Ross, R. (2002). The new sweatshops in the United States; how new, how real, how many, and why. Free Trade and Uneven Development:The North American American Apparel Industry After NAFTA.100-122.

DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958

Ruzindana, A. (1997). The importance of leadership in fighting corruption in Uganda. Corruption and the Global Economy, 133-145.

Ruzindana, A., Langseth, P., & Gakwandi, A. (1998). Fighting Corruption in Uganda the Process of Building a National Integrity System. Philipapers.

Schütte, S., & Kreutzmann, H. (2015). Making a living in Varanasi.

DOI: 10.1080/14697010903549408

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities: Sage Publications.

Sedigh, S., & Ruzindana, A. (1999). The fight against corruption in Uganda. Stapenhurst and Kpundeh. World Bank.

DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X00014774

DOI: 10.1177/026537888400100204

DOI: 10.4324/9781315067339

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00394.x

DOI: 10.2753/IMO0020-8825440202

DOI: 10.1108/JGM-05-2016-0019

Wekesa, P. W. (2010). Magendo & Survivalism. Borders & Borderlands as Resources in the Horn of Africa, 151-168.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00058.x

DOI: 10.1002/tie.20086

DOI: 10.1177/0170840607078115

DOI: 10.1080/15332969.1998.9985335

DOI: 10.1002/pa.1587

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2012.0033