The influence of ecolabels in the consumption of green products: a study on Durban consumers
Obed Chauke ORCID ↗ · Raymond Hawkins-Mofokeng
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 5 · 48-57
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to ascertain the influence of ecolabels in the consumption of certified green products. It explores ecolabels in Durban, hoping to gain valuable insights into ecolabels’ role in influencing the consumption of certified green products. The study employed a quantitative and a non-probability sampling method to understand the influence of ecolabels among green consumers in Durban. To ensure that the data represents the diversity of Durban consumers, a random sampling method was adopted. The data was collected using questionnaires and analysed using the IBM SPSS Version 25. The study employed a sample of 384 customers from retail malls within selected Durban suburbs. The findings revealed that consumers generally have a positive perception of ecolabels and are likely to recommend certified green products. However, the data also revealed that there is scepticism around certified green products as they are considered expensive and can perhaps be attributed to the high cost of certification, credibility issues and the cost associated with the ecolabelling. There is a potential trend towards wider acceptance, with more respondents trusting the authenticity of ecolabels than not. The study also found that older respondents and those with higher income tend to have a more positive perception of ecolabels, potentially due to higher disposable income and greater familiarity with the concept. This suggests that addressing concerns about cost and credibility could further increase positive consumer perception of ecolabels. Businesses can use these findings to develop strategies to address consumer concerns about the cost and credibility of certified green products. They can also target marketing efforts towards older demographics and higher-income consumers who are more receptive to ecolabels. Policymakers can use the findings to evaluate the effectiveness of existing ecolabeling programs and also develop strategies to increase consumer awareness and trust in ecolabels, especially younger audiences.
Keywords: {'name': 'Ecolabels; green products; green consumption; consumer behaviour; certified green products'}
Authors & affiliations
Obed Chauke
Affiliation not supplied
Raymond Hawkins-Mofokeng
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416568
Cheung, J., Nowak, C., Fillare, C., Gonzalez-Wertz, C., Orrell, G., & Peterson, S. (2022). Balancing sustainability and profitability. https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/report/2022-sustainability-consumer-research
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104176
DOI: 10.1108/13563280410551105
Dahlstrom, R. F. (2011). Green Marketing Management. Cengage learning.
DOI: 10.1111/rego.12166
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n6p124
EPA. (2022). Sustainable Marketplace: Greener Products and Services. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/introduction-ecolabels-and-standards-greener-products
eThekwini-Municipality. (2023). Integrated Development Plan. Durban Retrieved from https://www.durban.gov.za/storage/Documents/Integrated%20Development%20Plans%20IDP%20-%20eThekwini%20Municipality/Integrated%20Development%20Plan%202023-24%20to%202027-28.pdf
GEN. (2022). What is Ecolabelling? Global Ecolabelling Network. https://globalecolabelling.net/about/what-is-ecolabelling/
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107173
DOI: 10.3390/su9050751
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01741-9
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01741-9
ISO. (2018). ISO 14024:2018(en) Environmental labels and declarations - Type I environmental labelling - Principles and procedures. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14024:ed-2:v1:en
DOI: 10.1108/07363769910289550
DOI: 10.3390/su12010221
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.005
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-021-01866-5
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-03-2014-0115
Nguyen, L. Q., & Du, Q. (2010). Effectiveness of Eco-label? : A Study of Swedish University Students' Choice on Ecological Food Umeå University].
DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00317-x
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-019-01611-z
DOI: 10.1108/17515631111114877
DOI: 10.3390/su13126867
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2019.4.6.158
DOI: 10.36713/epra4467
DOI: 10.1002/cb.1501
Shingrup, S. (2013). Ecolabels: A green sustainability recital in Marketing-An empirical framework. Voice of Research, 2(1), 53-57.
DOI: 10.30958/ajbe.4.2.3
Sutherland, C., Diedrichs, N., Sim, V., Van Niekerk, M., Scott, D., Mander, M., Lervik, M., Sibanda, F., & Mbarathi, N. (2012). Developing a Strategy for a Green Economy in KwaZulu-Natal. https://www.kznedtea.gov.za/documents/Developing%20KZN%20Green%20Economy%20Strategy%20Vol%204.pdf
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012045
DOI: 10.4236/ib.2014.63013
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007122319675
DOI: 10.1108/03090561011079882
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.037