Political marketing mix and the influence of social media promotion on voting decision through perceived value: a study of the 2020 South Tangerang city election
Prabhaswara Putra Wiwoho ORCID ↗ · Fatchur Rohman
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 5 · 160-174
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This research aims to examine the influence of Marketing Mix (4P) variables consisting of product, price, place, and promotion, perceived value, and vote decision. The approach used in this research is a quantitative approach. The sample used in this research is the community in South Tangerang City registered in the Permanent Voter List in the 2020 South Tangerang City Regional Election, totaling 175 respondents. Research data was obtained from the result of filling out a questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling analysis techniques with the help of the Smart PLS program. The results of this research show that (i) Political Product affects the voting decision; the higher the political product possessed by the political candidate, the higher the voting decision, and vice versa; (ii) Political Price affects the voting decision; the higher the Political Price, the higher the voting decision, and vice versa; (iii) Political Place does not have a significant effect on voting decision, which means that people in South Tangerang City prefer promotion through social media; (iv) Political Promotion affects the Voting Decision; the higher the Political Promotion, the higher the Voting Decision, and vice versa; (v) Political Promotion affects perceived value; the higher the political promotion, the higher the perceived value in the community, and vice versa; (vi) Perceived Value affects the Voting Decision; the higher the Perceived Value, the higher the Voting Decision, and vice versa; (vii) Perceived Value positively mediates the relationship between Political Promotion and Voting Decision. The promotion variable has the highest value and the strongest influence on voting decision. In general, the conclusion drawn from this research is that the implementation of Marketing Mix (4P) is important in influencing the voting decision of the community in South Tangerang City. Political candidates can pay attention to these aspects to strengthen their advantage in future political contests.
Keywords: {'name': 'Political marketing'}, {'name': 'Marketing Mix'}, {'name': 'Election'}, {'name': 'Governance, Political-economy, Public Trust, Societal Leadership, South Africa'}
Authors & affiliations
Prabhaswara Putra Wiwoho
Affiliation not supplied
Fatchur Rohman
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Admand Nursal. (2004). Political MarketingL Strategi Pemenangan Pemilu: Sebuah Pendekatan Baru Kampanye Pemilihan DPR, DPD, Presiden. Gramedia Pustaka Utama Jakarta.
Adwishanty, P. R. (2019). Penerapan Marketing Mix Sebagai Strategi Dalam Target Pasar Politik Generasi Millenial. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Budaya, 41(63), 7475–7488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47313/jib.v41i63.688
DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v3i4.797
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.272
DOI: 10.35797/jab.8.2.2019.23560.34-42
Bashir, M. A., Ali, M. H., Wai, L. M., Hossain, M. I., & Rahaman, M. S. (2020). Mediating effect of customer perceived value on the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction of E-Banking in Bangladesh. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(2), 3590–3606.
Bastian, A. F. (2022). Strategi Marketing Mix Politik dalam Pemenangan Pilkada. Yayasan Pustaka Obor.
DOI: 10.21511/im.15(4).2019.02
DOI: 10.1086/209170
Data Statistik Jumlah Penduduk Kota Tangerang Selatan. (2020). BPS
Fahad. (2024). Exploring Role of Political Human Brand Personality, Appearance and Behavioral as Political Brand Association in Political Campaigns for Voters’ Preferences. Hournal of Managerial Science, 18(2).
Firmanzah. (2008). Mengelola Partai Politik: Komunikasi dan Positioning Idelogi Politik di Era Demokrasi. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Firmanzah. (2012). Political Marketing Beetween Understanding and Reality. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1704.1580
DOI: 10.1109/IEEM55944.2022.9990002
DOI: 10.1108/SJME-08-2021-0151
Inco Hary Perdana. (2012). Political Marketing Partai Politik Baru Menuju Pemilu 2014 (Studi Kasus Pemenangan Partai Nasdem). Universitas Indonesia.
DOI: 10.1504/IJBIS.2015.070903
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103901
Kalonda. (2023). The Aplicability of Political Marketing and Its Impact on Voters. GSJ, 11(2).
Kotler, Armstrong, Ang, Leong, Tan, Y. (2008). Principles of marketing: An global perspective. Journal of Management, 8.
DOI: 10.1002/mar.4220120104
DOI: 10.29303/jmm.v8i2.429
Mohanachandran, D. K., & Govindarajo, N. S. (2020). Theory of reasoned action and citizen’s voting behaviour. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(1), 695–715.
DOI: 10.1145/3457640.3457660
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.201021.051
Muhammad Dang Tegas. (2023). Suksesi Politik dan Pilkada?: Studi Kasus Kekalahan Muhammad dan Saraswati Dalam Pilkada 2020 di Kota Tangerang Selatan. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
DOI: 10.1108/MIP-01-2022-0042
DOI: 10.35906/equili.v12i2.1572
Niway Yimer. (2020). the effect of political marketing mix elements on voters’ loyalty (the case of marketing in prosperity party). ST Mary University.
DOI: 10.57233/gujos.v4i2.21
DOI: 10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100120
Panjaitan, M. J. (2021). Pengaruh Product, Promotion, Price dan Place Politik Partai Baru terhadap Preferensi Politik Generasi Milenial pada Pemilihan Legislatif Tahun 2019. Journal of Governmental and Social Issues, 1(3).
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08169
DOI: 10.1108/eb024729
Retia Kartika Dewi. (2023). Kenapa Indonesia disebut Negara Demokrasi? https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2023/10/30/143000769/kenapa-indonesia-disebut-negara-demokrasi-ini-penjelasannya
DOI: 10.4324/9781315256832-1
DOI: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i2.362
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101887
DOI: 10.3390/socsci13030149
DOI: 10.18551/rjoas.2018-11.22
DOI: 10.55927/fjss.v3i1.7680
DOI: 10.17509/jbme.v4i1.15999
Wibowo, G. L. (2022). Pengaruh Strategi Bauran Pemasaran Politik Terhadap Keputusan Memilih (Survei Pada Pemilih Pemula Lampung) [Universitas Lampung]. https://digilib.unila.ac.id/62854/3/TESIS TANPA BAB PEMBAHASAN.pdf
DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.1997.9964502
DOI: 10.1108/ITP-02-2022-0091
DOI: 10.52728/ijjm.v2i4.275
DOI: 10.1177/002224298805200302