Board nationality diversity and shareholder value creation
Douglas Zvinowanda ORCID ↗ · Chengedzai Mafini ORCID ↗ · John D. Beneke ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 5 · 01-18
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The study examined the influence of board nationality diversity on shareholder value creation of non- financial companies listed on the JSE for a 10- year period from 2013 to 2022.The study used quantitative quasi-experimental research design. The study measured board nationality diversity using proportion of foreign directors on board, Blau index for board nationality diversity, dummy variables for one, two and three or foreign directors. The proxies of shareholder value creation included standard market value added, market- to book ratio and Tobin’s Q and fixed effects model based on linear and curvilinear models were used to test the hypotheses. Main findings of the study demonstrate that proportion of foreign directors on board has an insignificant negative impact on standardised market value added and Tobin’s Q, while significant negative impact on market to book ratio. Blau index for board nationality diversity has insignificant negative impact on standardised market value added and market to book ratio, yet insignificant positive impact on Tobin’s Q. One foreign director on board has significant positive impact on standard market value added and market to book ratio, while insignificant positive impact on Tobin’s Q. Two and three foreign directors on board have insignificant positive impact on all shareholder value creation measures. In relation to curvilinear models, proportion of foreign directors on board and Blau in index for board nationality diversity have both positive and negative impact on all shareholder value creation measures highlighting an inverted U- shaped effects.
Keywords: {'name': 'Corporate governance, board nationality diversity, shareholder value creation, South Africa, non-financial companies, curvilinear models'}
Authors & affiliations
Douglas Zvinowanda
Affiliation not supplied
Chengedzai Mafini
Affiliation not supplied
John D. Beneke
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i9.3079
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12503
DOI: 10.1177/09721509221124125
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2020.07.001
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14110507
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-03-2021-0076
DOI: 10.3390/su16093773
DOI: 10.1108/CG-08-2020-0344
DOI: 10.3390/su132111687
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.101978
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211032640
DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1502173
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20207601051
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2976
DOI: 10.3390/ijfs11030100
Byrne, D., (1971). The attraction paradigm, New York: Academic Press.
DOI: 10.1177/1744987120927206
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-018-0774-x
DOI: 10.12775/CJFA.2023.003
DOI: 10.1108/RIBS-09-2021-0120
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3378
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2299
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2339
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15080332
DOI: 10.3390/su152316142
DOI: 10.1108/JMB-11-2021-0057
DOI: 10.1353/jda.2021.0035
DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-12-2021-0350
DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101071
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006
DOI: 10.21511/imfi.20(1).2023.13
DOI: 10.1108/JGR-08-2023-0135
DOI: 10.1177/2278533720923508
DOI: 10.1108/CG-04-2018-0138
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.007
DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-02-2020-0037
DOI: 10.1108/IJOEM-04-2022-0727
DOI: 10.1108/CG-06-2020-0222
DOI: 10.3390/su16093711
DOI: 10.1007/s10997-021-09575-9
Kanter, R.M. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2019.1611719
DOI: 10.1002/mde.3626
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2022-0055
Kolamker, P. P., & Ingalhalli, V. B. (2024). Accruals-based earnings management practices and shareholder value: a study on corporate governance in Indian Companies. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 23(1), 1-23
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-019-00408-4
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20219202049
DOI: 10.15549/jeecar.v9i3.822
Kristie, J. 2011. The power of three, directors and boards, 35(5), 22-32.
DOI: 10.1177/0972262921992152
DOI: 10.1186/s43093-023-00258-5
DOI: 10.1556/204.2020.00007
DOI: 10.1057/s41267-021-00488-1
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15080368
DOI: 10.1590/1678-6971/eramf210152
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0231
DOI: 10.1177/2277977919881388
DOI: 10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0053
Mathangi, V., & Vijaykarthigeyan, K. T. (2020). Value relevance of EVA and traditional performance measures in determining shareholder value–Use of Easton and Harris Model (1991)–Evidence from India. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(11). https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.11.2020.165
DOI: 10.3390/safety10010017
DOI: 10.24191/APMAJ.V16i1-12
DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-12-2021-0155
DOI: 10.1007/s43546-023-00590-6
DOI: 10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.97.743.751
DOI: 10.31130/ud-jst.2023.137E
DOI: 10.1177/09721509221123198
Pellicelli, M. (2020). Creazione di valore e Value Based Management. Economia Aziendale Online-, 11(1), 55-68.
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122162
DOI: 10.1108/JIC-08-2021-0207
Rappaport, A. (1984). Have we been measuring success with the wrong ruler. Wall Street Journal, 25.
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-05030-9
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-020-00430-x
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-07-2020-0186
Shukla, M. (2018). National diversity on board and firm performance-evidence from India. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 15(3), 29-41.
DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-12-2021-0621
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2021-0264
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0032
DOI: 10.21315/aamj2023.28.1.8
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2059
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652