Environmental sustainability in South Africa's 3D printing sector

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of 3D printing cost, 3D printing technology adoption and regulatory compliance on environmental sustainability among 3D printing firms in South Africa. The study also investigated the mediating effect of regulatory compliance on the relationships between 3D printing cost and 3D printing technology adoption on environmental sustainability. The study adopted a deductive research approach, quantitative research method and an explanatory correlational research design. Simple random sampling technique was used to select a total of 152 employees of 3D printing firms in South Africa. Questionnaires served as the data collection instruments, and online data gathering was done using Google Forms. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 software was used for data coding, data entry, and descriptive statistics. Smart PLS 4 was used to conduct partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modelling. Results of the study indicate that a significant negative relationship exists between 3D printing cost and environmental sustainability while a significant positive relationship was found to exist between 3D printing technology adoption and environmental sustainability among 3D printing firms in South Africa. A significant positive relationship also exists between 3D printing regulatory compliance and environmental sustainability. For mediation effects, it was found that 3D printing regulatory compliance negatively mediates the relationship between cost and environmental sustainability. The results also indicated that regulatory compliance does not mediate the relationship between 3D printing technology and environmental sustainability. The study concludes that, in as much as 3D printing costs and technology adoption are essential, regulatory compliance has significant role to play in ensuring the maximization of environmental sustainability in South Africa’s 3D printing industry.

Authors & affiliations

Ntokozo Dlamini
Affiliation not supplied

Thywill Cephas Dzogbewu
Affiliation not supplied

Dennis Yao Dzansi
Affiliation not supplied

Deon Johan De Beer
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112947

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63510-1

DOI: 10.3992/jgb.16.2.129

DOI: 10.9734/BJMCS/2016/25183

DOI: 10.7441/joc.2021.02.01

DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102516

DOI: 10.1155/2020/1424682

DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.05.008

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2017.103017

DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2016-0079

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104156

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140905

DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12587

DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12618

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009

DOI: 10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1441

DOI: 10.1037/pas0000626

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.182

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884

DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12641

DOI: 10.1155/2023/7465737

DOI: 10.1155/2019/9656938

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127027

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100689

DOI: 10.1080/1061186X.2021.1935973

DOI: 10.1109/ICTUS.2017.8286097

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120368

Nissan, A. M. (2016). Regulating the three-dimensional future: How the FDA should structure a regulatory mechanism for additive manufacturing (3D printing). BUJ Science & Technology Law, 22, 267. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jstl22&div=13

DOI: 10.1080/2374068X.2021.1945311

DOI: 10.1007/s11573-016-0806-8

DOI: 10.1177/0013164415593776

DOI: 10.1039/D1RA04060J