Assessment of professional perceptions in business evaluation in South Africa
Kansilembo Freddy Aliamutu ORCID ↗ · Kerry-lee Gurr ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 5 · 228-237
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:18 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This paper seeks to evaluate proficient perceptions within business assessments in South Africa, where such perceptions play a significant role in the evaluation process, encompassing the selection of standards and the establishment of evaluation frameworks. The evolving economy of South Africa is marked by fluctuating economic circumstances and potential growth, compounded by inadequate benchmarks and a scarcity of relevant market information. Forecasting growth rates are further complicated by macroeconomic uncertainties, leading to a reliance on proficient perceptions when industry-specific guidelines and easily comprehensible alternatives to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) are lacking. A mixed-methods strategy is employed in this study, combining quantitative and qualitative data, along with surveys set benchmarks for business assessments. The outcomes reveal that modifications based on judgment are necessary for variables like organizational size due to the absence of CAPM alternatives. This study stresses the importance of translating scholarly discoveries into practical applications, emphasizing the challenges and uncertainties that call for proficient perceptions in business evaluations. It advances the comprehension of these obstacles and proposes that further exploring macroeconomic variables and industry-specific guidelines could offer valuable insights. The study suggests that biases in evaluations, influenced by client interests, present a promising area for future inquiry.
Keywords: {'name': 'Proficient perception, Business evaluation, cash flow, growth rate and Macroeconomic factors'}
Authors & affiliations
Kansilembo Freddy Aliamutu
Affiliation not supplied
Kerry-lee Gurr
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.14254/jems.2024.9-1.7
DOI: 10.24815/jaroe.v7i1.34501
DOI: 10.47540/ijias.v4i1.1259
Barac, K. (2009a). South African training officers' perception of skills requirements for entry-level trainee accountants. Southern African Business Review, 13, 61-86.
DOI: 10.1108/10222529200900010
DOI: 10.20853/36-2-4170
DOI: 10.4314/jlt.v45i2.9
DOI: 10.21511/bbs.12(2).2017.05
DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2020.1860204
DOI: 10.1108/00400911111147677
DOI: 10.1108/JEDT-10-2021-0571
DOI: 10.4314/jlt.v41i1.6078
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v5n10p128
DOI: 10.3390/educsci11100641
DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2365
DOI: 10.15700/saje.v41ns1a2156
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2019.1662575
DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1778
DOI: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00461.x
DOI: 10.1108/PM-04-2014-0021
DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2020.1799899
DOI: 10.1007/s12134-019-00704-w
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2001.10383092
DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2021.1978932