Assuring the chairperson’s statement in the integrated report

Abstract

The study aimed to design the auditing framework for the audit of the chairperson’s statement. The chairperson’s statement is one of the most read narrative disclosure statements in the integrated report. Non-financial information has become twice as important as financial information yet, it is not required by the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS). The chairperson’s statement is not audited and this leads to the use of impression management tactics. This study answers the call from different scholars who have called upon the audit of the chairperson’s statement to curve the use of impression management tactics. The mixed method is used for data analysis. Perception of external auditors is sought through the Likert scale and interviews to ensure triangulation. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and thematic analysis are used to analyze the data. The study found that auditors are aware of the existing concern about the use of impression management in the chairperson’s statement. In this regard, an audit of the chairperson’s statement is deemed appropriate and long overdue. External auditors are the most suitable experts to audit the chairperson’s statement and issue reasonable assurance. Secondly, auditors believe that the reliability of the chairperson’s statement is crucial and to ensure credibility, the company must have strong internal control, and report accurate and complete information in the chairperson’s statement. The auditing framework is designed and shown through an integrative conceptual model. The results are consistent with previous studies that emphasise the need for the assurance of non-financial information in the integrated report. This study triggers debates amongst accounting firms, standard setters, and policymakers on the adoption of the auditing framework for the chairperson’s statement to give assurance to the users. The study contributes to the body of knowledge with an auditing framework to audit the chairperson’s statement, the first of its kind. Lastly, the study adds to the developing debate on the assurance of narrative disclosure parts of the integrated report.

Keywords: {'name': 'Auditing framework'}, {'name': 'Chairperson’s statement'}, {'name': 'Impression Management'}, {'name': 'Narrative disclosure'}, {'name': 'Integrative conceptual model'}

Authors & affiliations

Masibulele Phesa
Affiliation not supplied

Mabutho Sibanda
Affiliation not supplied

Zamanguni Hariatah Gumede
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1294097

DOI: 10.1057/s41310-017-0026-7

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1554

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.8925191

Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217-225.

DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2013.867403

DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-07-2014-0047

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001

DOI: 10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.001.0001

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.001

DOI: 10.1002/isaf.256

DOI: 10.1007/s00187-020-00295-z

Bowen, P. W., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods theory and practice. Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10.

DOI: 10.1080/13602381.2013.811825

DOI: 10.14453/aabfj.v8i3.2

DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729645

DOI: 10.1108/09513570610679100

DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-50876

DOI: 10.1108/09513579810231457

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.03.005

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000086

Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2013, 541-545.

DOI: 10.1108/10222521211234200

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736

DOI: 10.26710/jafee.v8i4.2501

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001

DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.001

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00239.x

Fiorini, L., Griffiths, A., & Houdmont, J. (2016). Mixed methods research in the health sciences: A review.

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2005.01.002

DOI: 10.1504/IJMFA.2018.091662

DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00186.x

DOI: 10.1177/0148558X16663091

DOI: 10.18488/journal.aefr.2020.1010.1115.1130

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.005

Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size.

DOI: 10.1201/9781315144948

DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-07-2021-0209

Kerlinger, F. N., Lee, H. B., & Bhanthumnavin, D. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research: The most sustainable popular textbook by Ker- linger & Lee (2000). Journal of Social Development, 13, 131-144.

DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-03-2017-0062

DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2018-0403

DOI: 10.1002/bse.2467

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and designing. New Jersey: Merritt Prentice Hall.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2015.04.002

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.004

DOI: 10.1109/ICCIT.2009.207

DOI: 10.3390/risks11030054

DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.008

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2017.03.003

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2018-3463

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.02.001

DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v4i6.857

DOI: 10.1108/01443570010318896

Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 27, 116- 196.

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2039

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1839174

Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.

DOI: 10.1002/bse.1935

DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v4n2p67

Mir, M. Z., Chatterjee, B., & Rahaman, A. S. (2009). Culture and corporate voluntary reporting: A comparative exploration of the chairperson's report in India and New Zealand. Managerial Auditing Journal.

Mmako, N. (2016). The chairperson's statement: Understanding prioritisation of discretionary disclosures by Johannesburg Security Exchange listed companies. Journal of Contemporary Management, 13(1), 385-408.

Moola, M. (2016). An Exploratory Study Into Impression Management Practices of Chairman's Statements in South African Annual Reports the University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management.

DOI: 10.4324/9781003132851-6

DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.08.007

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3308

DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v4i5.744

Nayak, M., & Narayan, K. (2019). Strengths and weaknesses of online surveys. Technology, 6(7), 0837-2405053138.

DOI: 10.36615/jcssa.v40i2.1314

DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.002

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06712

DOI: 10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2013.22

Phesa, M., Khumalo, Q. P., & Sibanda, M. (2021a, 1-3 December 2021). Impression Management Examination in Chairpersons’ Statements in the Top 40 JSE Listed Companies. Mbali Conference 2021 Proceedings, University of Zululand.

Phesa, M., Khumalo, Q. P., & Sibanda, M. (2021b). Impression Management Examination in Chairpersons’ Statements in the Top 40 JSE Listed Companies. Mbali Conference 2021 Proceedings, University of Zululand.

DOI: 10.26710/jbsee.v8i3.2488

DOI: 10.4135/9780857024589.d12

DOI: 10.1002/csr.1474

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01584.x

DOI: 10.1057/s41310-020-00093-y

DOI: 10.1057/s41310-020-00093-y

Rutland, M., & Barlex, D. (2006). Developing a conceptual framework for auditing design decisions in food technology: The potential impact on initial teacher education (ITE) and classroom practice.

DOI: 10.35360/njes.275

DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2014-0053

DOI: 10.1108/09513570010353738

DOI: 10.5539/ies.v12n10p1

DOI: 10.37134/ibej.Vol15.2.3.2022

DOI: 10.25159/1998-8125/3841

DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01004.x

Totowa, J., & Mokoaleli-Mokoteli, T. (2021). Chairman’s Letter, Impression Management and Governance Mechanisms: A Case of South African Listed Firms. African Finance Journal, 23(1), 1-19.

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2012.05.002

DOI: 10.4102/jef.v13i1.548

DOI: 10.4236/me.2016.76076

Willits, F. K., Theodori, G. L., & Luloff, A. (2016). Another look at Likert scales. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 31(3), 6.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1910-9_40

DOI: 10.36615/jcsa.v38i1.1542

DOI: 10.36615/jcsa.v36i1.1578

Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of technology and teacher education, 9(1), 5-30.