The law politics of bankruptcy decision execution against debtor's assets abroad

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze law politics related to the execution of bankruptcy decisions against debtor assets abroad. The research method used is normative legal research with a qualitative descriptive analysis method approach, based on comparative law, with prescriptive analytical specifications. The research findings conclude that sovereignty is interpreted as the responsibility to improve and protect all national and international community interests, manifested in the form of the state's ability to interact and establish relations with countries in the world, as well as cooperate and coordinate bilaterally, multilaterally and in international organizations. The provisions on international bankruptcy in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations or Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Bankruptcy Law) are similar to the Dutch Bankruptcy Law, there are no comprehensive regulations related to international bankruptcy. To ensure legal certainty, a legal policy is needed in the form of changes and updates to the Bankruptcy Law by adding articles to apply the principles of international bankruptcy in the Model Law, namely the Principle of Access, the Principle of Recognition, the Principle of Assistance and the Principle of Cooperation and Coordination, as applied in the US Bankruptcy Code Chapter 15. Article 299 of the Bankruptcy Law also needs to be amended so that the procedural law applied is the special procedural law for international bankruptcy.

Keywords: {'name': 'Law Politics, Debtor Assets, Sovereignty, Bankruptcy Law, International Bankruptcy, Model Law'}

Authors & affiliations

Unggul Wibawa Widhayaka
Affiliation not supplied

Sonyendah Retnaningsih
Affiliation not supplied

Sufiarina
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Adewale, Y., & Fajar, M. (2017). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

DOI: 10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.2499

Anisairufah, & Yahya, A. (2023). The application of cross-border insolvency bankruptcy in the execution of debtor's assets in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis. Student Journal of International Law, Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University, 3(1), 177-193. e-ISSN: 2807-8497.

DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v5i3.2245

Britannica. (2024). Sovereignty. The Editors of Encyclopaedia. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/sovereignty

DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v2i2.222-235

Congressional Research Service. (2022). Bankruptcy Basics: A Primer. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.govR45137

DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4334

De Rechtspraak. (2015). International Insolvency. Retrieved from https://www.rechtspraak.nl/English/Pages/International-Insolvency.aspx#cb01f363-fd8e-4073-8fe3-1113887a8b5a5a3194d6-d64d-45e7-929b-bc40836492a23

DOI: 10.30649/ph.v23i2.240

Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fitriah, M. (2024). Eksekusi boedel pailit yang berada di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 8(2), 1338-1347. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v8i1.1559

Freeman, M. (2003). Current Legal Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01302.8

Gross, M. (1991). Foreign creditor’s rights: Recognition of foreign bankruptcy adjudications in the United States and the Republic of Singapore. Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law, 12(1), 125-152. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1563&context=jil

DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v4i1.76875

DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v4i2.41913

Hakim, L., & Saputra, N. D. (2023). Politik hukum insolvency test dalam pembaharuan hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(8), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8360194

DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v6i2.11079

Haq, M. H. M. (2023). Model law on cross border insolvency dalam ratifikasi pengaturan hukum kepailitan lintas batas di Indonesia. Jurnal Negara dan Keadilan, Universitas Islam Malang, 12(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.33474/negkea.v12i2.20034

DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v3i11.2098

International Principle of Law Trans-Lex.org. (N/A). Lex specialis-principle. Retrieved from https://www.trans-lex.org/910000/_/lex-specialis-principle/

Irwansyah. (2022). Penelitian hukum, pilihan metode & praktik penulisan artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5139

Iswara, I. G. N. B. M., Nahak, S., & Mahendrawati, N. L. M. (2019). Kepastian hukum pengenaan pajak penghasilan transaksi jual beli tanah dan/atau bangunan. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, Universitas Warmadewa, 6(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.6.1.2019.42-51

DOI: 10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22

Keay, A., & Walton, P. (2011). Insolvency law. London: Jordans.

Kelsen, H. (2007). Teori hukum murni, dasar-dasar ilmu hukum normatif (Cetakan II, Diterjemahkan dari buku Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law). Bandung: Penerbit Nusamedia dan Penerbit Nuansa.

DOI: 10.32734/rslr.v3i1.16413

DOI: 10.25162/arsp-2016-0020

DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v7i2.3681

DOI: 10.33756/jelta.v14i01.10206

Margolang, F. I. (2024). Kontrak perdagangan internasional dalam perspektif hukum perdata dalam menyikapi perbedaan yuridiksi. Gerechtikeit Journal, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati, 1(1), 26-31. https://journal.inacexter.com/index.php/gerechtikieit©International Academic Research Center

DOI: 10.1002/iir.1203

DOI: 10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.51

Novaldy, M., & Alfarizi, A. (2024). Penerapan positivisme hukum terhadap asas keadilan dalam putusan pengadilan. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, Universitas Pasundan, 2(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx

Nrangwesti, A. (2022). Konsep kedaulatan dalam perspektif hukum internasional, hukum pidana dan pembangunan hukum. Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, 5(1), 11-24. Retrieved from https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/hpph/issue/view/1044

Omar, P. J. (2008). Insolvency law: Themes and perspectives. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.

Penjelasan UU Kepailitan (Pebjelasan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang)

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan

DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.1060

DOI: 10.56127/jukim.v2i6.987

DOI: 10.26623/julr.v4i2.4238

DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.3333

DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v10i2.6381

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.982678

Rice University-OpenStax. (n.d.). Types of legal systems around the world. Retrieved from https://openstax.org/books/introduction-political-science/pages/11-3-types-of-legal-systems-around-the-world

DOI: 10.46799/jst.v2i2.228

Riwanto, A. (2016). Sejarah hukum: Konsep, teori, dan metodenya dalam pengembangan ilmu hukum. Oase Pustaka.

DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3942

DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01571-8

Shalihah, A., & Muni, A. (2023). Arah politik hukum dalam pembangunan sistem hukum nasional menurut undang-undang RPJPN 2005–2025. As-Shahifah Journal of Constitutional Law & Governance, 3(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v3i2.11094

Shidiq, R. M., Faisal, R., & Pratama, M. A. (2024). Rule of law dan perubahan hukum menurut Aristoteles. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx

Simanjuntak, R. (2015). Dispute settlement mechanisms under the ASEAN legal frameworks: A collective commitment creating the ruled-based ASEAN Economic Community. Jakarta: Kontan Publishing.

DOI: 10.32662/golrev.v2i2.704

DOI: 10.32662/golrev.v2i2.704

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan (Memahami undang-undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran). Jakarta: Kencana.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2018). Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan: Memahami undang-undang No 37 tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.

DOI: 10.33541/japs.v3i2.1317

Sulistio, C. T., & Trisnamansyah, P. (2020). Balancing host state sovereignty and foreign investors’ rights through a mining divestment rule. Transnational Business Law Journal, 1(1), 73–90. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/transbuslj/article/view/287

DOI: 10.14710/hp.7.2.171-181

Suryana. (2007). Hukum kepailitan: Kepailitan terhadap badan usaha asing oleh pengadilan niaga Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Sustra.

Sutrisno, F., Puluhulawa, F., & Tijow, L. M. (2029). Penerapan asas keadilan, kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan dalam putusan hakim tindak pidana korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(2), 168–187. E-ISSN: 2614-5030 P-ISSN: 2614-5022.

Sutter, O. (2020). The centre of main interest is in the eye of the beholder: The perspective from Europe. Norton Rose Fulbright. Retrieved from https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/

DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i1.53

DOI: 10.26877/m-y.v5i1.8803

The Cornell Law School. (n.d.). 11 U.S. Code § 1515 - Application for recognition. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/1515

The U.S. Courts. (n.d.). Bankruptcy. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy

The US Bankruptcy Code. (n.d.). Chapter 15 - Bankruptcy basics ancillary and other cross-border cases. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-15-bankruptcy-basics

The US Bankruptcy Code. (N/A). Chapter 15 - Bankruptcy Basics Ancillary and Other Cross-Border Cases. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-15-bankruptcy-basics

Tomasic, R. (2007). Insolvency law in East Asia. London: Ashgate Publishing.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1998. tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan Menjadi Undang-Undang.

DOI: 10.2307/1290306

DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6

DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i02.p14

Zakaria, E. H. P. (2023). Penerapan Omnibus Law dalam sistem legislasi nasional menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. Journal of Social Science Research, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 3(3), 10719–17033. E-ISSN 2807-4238, P-ISSN 2807-4246.