Engineering modelling requirements for integration of assistive technology as a pathway for inclusive education in the disability unit
Vhutshilo Macheque · Armstrong Kadyamatimba · Nixon Ochara
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 6 · 381-404
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The phenomenon of 'massification in higher education ', which refers to the significant increase in the number of students enrolling in universities, has made it difficult for inclusive education to be attainable owing to unknown reasons that are encumbering the students living with disability from having a sense of belonging. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the relationship between students living with disability and social justice through inclusivity in higher education with the aid of Assistive Technology (AT) to conceptualise a framework. The researchers employed a mixed methods approach to collect and analyse data statistically and descriptively. The requirements for integrating the model to ease the lack of consideration of students living with disability in the digital age were evaluated and critically reviewed regarding its impact on students’ sense of belonging in the digital age. The major findings from this study elucidate the factors perceived as the central requirements for mitigating the lack of inclusivity and social justice in higher education. The procurement of ATs was topical as most respondents (83%) categorically opined the need to improve this process by making timely purchases of the proper ATs from reliable service providers. The successful implementation of this framework could significantly enhance the educational experience of students with disabilities at the University of Venda, making it a more inclusive and supportive learning environment. The findings on the appropriateness of ATs for students overwhelmingly indicated that many of the available devices and technologies meant to assist learners were not fit for the tasks they were intended for. The university should establish a procurement committee and a high-level action plan outlining the requirements for delivering assistive products & services.
Keywords: {'name': 'Decontextualisation'}, {'name': 'Alienation'}, {'name': 'Social Injustice'}, {'name': 'Inclusivity,'}, {'name': 'Disengagement'}, {'name': 'Assistive Technology'}
Authors & affiliations
Vhutshilo Macheque
Affiliation not supplied
Armstrong Kadyamatimba
Affiliation not supplied
Nixon Ochara
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.5296/jse.v3i2.3424
Bagadood, N. H., & Sulaimani, M. F. (2022). Exploring the perceptions of individuals with intellectual disabilities on the Sa3ee rehabilitation and employment initiative in Saudi Arabia. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 97(97), 43-58.
Bayaga, A. & Morar, T., (2023). Assistive Computer Application Software, a Tool for Enhancing Mathematics Cognition. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 34, bayaga-mandela.
DOI: 10.4102/ajod.v10i0.767
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2014.31
DOI: 10.30935/ijpdll/13062
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1552871
DOI: 10.1177/002224377901600110
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
DOI: 10.1177/2631787720902473
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107284
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2012.669022
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2023.2233683
Education, M. H. (2016). 2016 Digital Study Trends Survey.
Erdem, R. (2017). Students with special educational needs and assistive technologies: A literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1), 128-146.
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_2
Fidock, J. and Carroll, J. 2009. Combining Variance and Process Research Approaches to Understand System Use 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems Combining Variance and Process Research Approaches. ACIS 2009 Proceedings: 235 -244. 2-4 Dec 2009, Melbourne, Victoria. Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) www.pecutilities.co.za
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_8
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1039607
DOI: 10.1109/CIMCA.2005.1631273
DOI: 10.34293/education.v12i2.7182
Khanyile, G. S. (2022). Policy coordination in intergovernmental relations in South Africa: A case study of higher education institutions. https://core.ac.uk/download/588589037.pdf
Layton N, Hubbard W, Burton J, et al. 2016. Quality, Choice and Outcomes in Assistive Technology (AT) Equipment Funding Schemes: A Procurement Case Study. Health Syst Policy Res. 2016, 3:1: 1-8
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.2.165
Maia, M. J., Hennen, L., & Wolbring, G. (2018). Assistive technologies for people with disabilities-Part II: Current and emerging technologies. https://doi.org/10.2861/567013
DOI: 10.3390/soc10040074
DOI: 10.1109/GHTC.2015.7343953
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01729-x
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01729-x
DOI: 10.3390/info12030128
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083892
DOI: 10.3390/soc10020041
DOI: 10.1177/0894486516679749
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063039
Povic, J. S. 2021. Building Knowledge To Advance
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3881150
Provisions, A., The, F. O. R., Of, E., With, S., In, D., & Schools, D. (2014). Assistive provisions for the education of students with learning International Journal of Fundamental & Applied Research. December.
Rashied, N. (2018). Adaptive learning technology in higher education: lessons from an economics classroom in South Africa. Beyond Familiar Territories.
DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125276
DOI: 10.1177/0145482X0910300907
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1431-3.ch012
DOI: 10.4324/9781003310426-41
Suwahyo, B. W., Setyosari, P. & Praherdhiono, H. 2021. Barrier Assistive Technology in Inclusive Classroom.Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 601. 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2021)
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1646821
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102399
Visagiei, S., Scheffleri, E., Seymourii, N. & Mjii, G. 2020. Assistive Technology service delivery in South Africa: conceptualising a systems approach. South African Health Review 2020: 119-127. https://www.hst.org.za/publications/South%20African%20Health%20Reviews/SAHR_Chapter%2012_15122020_Final.pdf
WHO.2021. Assistive product specifications and how to use them. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/339851/9789240020283-eng.pdf
World Health Organization, 2007. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2011). Summary World Report on Disability. World Health, 1–24.www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html%0Ahttp://www.larchetoronto.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/launch-of-World-Report-on-Disability-Jan-27121.pdf
DOI: 10.5772/60429