Exploring the market resilience of selected stocks in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
Samuel Tabot Enow
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 6 · 176-181
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The market resilience of a stock is an integral component of financial market because it supports smooth trading and absorb market shocks. However, the contention has always been to effectively determine the level of resilience in stocks with the application of proper methodology to make informed decisions. Therefore, aim of this study was to examine the level of market resilience in selected stocks in the Johannesburg stock exchange. Using a fixed effect model, the findings of this study indicates that most securities trading on the exchange lack market resilience. This was evident in the significant relationship between the specific independent and dependent variables. A risk coefficient should therefore be assigned to bid and ask to spread to enhance market resilience. These risk coefficients will induce the bid and ask prices to be close to the fundamental price.
Keywords: {'name': 'Market resilience'}, {'name': 'Fixed effect'}, {'name': 'Trading'}, {'name': 'Spread'}
Authors & affiliations
Samuel Tabot Enow
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1177/0972652714541340
Bhattacharya, S. N., & Bhattacharya, M. (2018). Persistence in liquidity measures: evidence from India. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(2):1-11.
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1586297
DOI: 10.20867/thm.18.2.2
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v27.n6.24
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2013.06.005
Chlistalla, M. (2011). From minutes to seconds and beyond: Measuring order?book resiliency in fragmented electronic securities markets. In proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011), Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context= ecis2011.
DOI: 10.1111/jfir.12229
Dániel, H., & Kata, V. (2015). Price impact and the recovery of the limit order book: Why should we care about informed liquidity providers? (Working Papers, No.40). Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfu027
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.967262
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.13752
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2013.12006.x
Gray, J. (2013). Toward a More Resilient Financial System. Seattle University Law Review, 36: 799-819.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.021
DOI: 10.1080/10196780600643977
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz048
DOI: 10.3390/su12229671
DOI: 10.1002/fut.21640
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.11.009
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12498
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2006.09.001
DOI: 10.1504/IJCEE.2019.10021465
Thomas, S. (2006). Resilience of Liquidity in Indian Securities Markets. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(32): 3452-3454.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2705654
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfds.2017.11.004
DOI: 10.1086/466942
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.01.011