Strategic alliance: The contribution of the “Belt and Road Initiative” to easing trade restrictions for Afghanistan
Guiliang Tian · Zaki Zakirullah ORCID ↗ · Haihua Ying
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 7 · 326-342
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:44 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Afghanistan and most developing, landlocked countries must prioritize regional diplomacy and make strategic alliances to eliminate economic difficulties and create opportunities for trade, partnerships, and markets that will encourage further integration. This research aims to identify workable value chains for integration under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and evaluate their suitability by considering their potential volume. This research investigates how BRI is decreasing trade restrictions and increasing connectivity through the use of quantitative techniques and a survey research approach. The research results demonstrate that BRI can have a major impact on Afghanistan's economic situation, particularly with trade volume, trade restrictions, diplomacy, negotiations, and implementation of such kinds of projects. The Initiative has the potential to significantly reduce trade restrictions, and challenges, and enhance trade connectivity by utilizing significant infrastructure investments and investment in Afghanistan. However, security risks and political concerns prevent the BRI from achieving maximum connectivity in this country. This study contributes to thoughtful strategic alliances such as BRI can facilitate Afghanistan's trade connectivity, sustainable development, and economic integration by giving stakeholders and policymakers useful data to accomplish opportunities and know obstacles.
Keywords: {'name': 'Trade Connectivity, Trade Restrictions, Regional Integration, Sustainable Development, Belt and Road Initiative, Strategic Alliances'}
Authors & affiliations
Guiliang Tian
Affiliation not supplied
Zaki Zakirullah
Affiliation not supplied
Haihua Ying
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.29322/IJSRP.9.05.2019.p8932
Airan, F., & Rahimi, L. (2022). The prospects of Afghan-China economic relationship. Biruni Institute, 1–18.
DOI: 10.1504/JGBA.2019.099921
Anna, U. W. (2016). Theory and studies on diplomacy. Diplomatic Research, 127(4), 4–19.
DOI: 10.21511/ppm.14(2-2).2016.04
DOI: 10.4324/9780203702659
DOI: 10.1177/009207038801600107
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2010.05.002
DOI: 10.1596/30477
DOI: 10.1017/S1816383111000051
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85931-2
DOI: 10.3390/economies8030054
DOI: 10.1057/s41267-017-0129-1
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2009939
DOI: 10.3390/economies6040062
Cacicedo, A. S. (2022). Afghanistan’s connectivity potential. Connectivity Research Report.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.01.007
Cao, Z. (2019). How to build and improve the tourism between China and Finland, whether the OBOR can promote it. Tourism Development Analysis Report.
DOI: 10.1111/mepo.12368
DOI: 10.1353/asp.2017.0023
DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2018.1439326
DOI: 10.1353/asp.2014.0012
Cowan, A. (2013). Afghanistan reconnected: Challenges and opportunities in the context of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Eastwest Institute Report.
Custer, S., Sethi, T., Solis, J. A., Lin, J. J., Ghose, S., Gupta, A., Knight, R., & Baehr, A. (2019). Silk Road Diplomacy: Deconstructing Beijing’s toolkit to influence South and Central Asia. Development Policy Review.
DOI: 10.22434/IFAMR2019.0115
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104910
DOI: 10.17016/ifdp.2020.1274
Development, U. N. C. O. T. A. (2019). Afghanistan rapid eTrade readiness assessment. Afghanistan Rapid eTrade Readiness Assessment.
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2020.1731008
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210916.027
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210916.027
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjx030
DOI: 10.33094/ijaefa.v13i1.611
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00614-6
Fazli, S. (2023). The impact of Afghanistan’s drug trade on its neighbours. Research Report.
DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104
Fulton, J. (2016). An analysis of two corridors in China’s One Belt One Road Initiative: China-Pakistan and China Central-West Asia. Proceedings of International Conference on Inter-Regional Connectivity: South Asia and Central Asia, September, 43–49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319900179
DOI: 10.1344/jesb2019.2.j062
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22169
DOI: 10.1017/S1062798721000296
Haiqing Huang. (2018). China’s image in the Belt and Road Initiative. International Perspective.
DOI: 10.3390/su15087012
Hameed, S. (2012). Prospects for Indian-Pakistan cooperation in Afghanistan. Research Report.
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202315704004
Harsh, V. P., & Premesha, S. (2021). Mapping the Belt and Road Initiative reach, implementations, consequences. Observer Research Foundation, 102.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4291992
DOI: 10.21275/SR23109202519
DOI: 10.1142/S1793969012500094
Holzmann, A. (2017). China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative: A discourse analysis of speeches by Chinese politicians and Indonesian newspaper articles. Analysis Report.
Hosseinzadah, B. (2021). U.S. public diplomacy towards Afghanistan (2001–2021). Research Article, 8(2).
DOI: 10.24052/IJBED/V06NU02/ART-03
Khalil, A. B. (2017). Linking Afghanistan to China’s Belt and Road. The Diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2017/04/linking-afghanistan-to-chinas-belt-and-road/?allpages=yes&print=yes
DOI: 10.47362/EJSSS.2023.4202
DOI: 10.35935/tax/24.4233
Kvedaras, V., Astudillo, J., & Astudillo, J. (2019). Journal pre-proof. Journal of Pre-proof.
Lam, T.-D. (2015). A review of modern trade theories. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(6), 604–614.
Leamer, E. E. (1995). The Heckscher-Ohlin model in theory and practice. International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
DOI: 10.51461/projectbaikal.72.1986
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.02.002
DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.97.3.562
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00084-5
Mukut, M. (2017). Bangladesh and China’s ambitious One-Belt, One-Road (OBOR) initiative. Research Report.
Munadi, S. M. (2018). The OBOR project: Economic initiatives around Afghanistan—Cooperation or competitions between stakeholders. Unam, 449–471.
Otmakhova, K. (2017). The Belt and Road for all: Rethinking globalization-driven urban development in Khorgos. TUDelft Repository.
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20140832
DOI: 10.59670/jns.v33i.608
DOI: 10.18615/anadolu.1310061
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8460
DOI: 10.3126/ijssm.v7i3.29964
DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i12.11508
Russel, D. R., & Berger, B. H. (2020). Weaponizing the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Policy Society Institute, 1–64.
Russel, D. R., Berger, B. H., Chance, A., & Mafinezam, A. (2016). American perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative. Institute for China-America Studies, 1–64.
Safi, M., & Alizada, B. (2018). Integrating Afghanistan into the Belt and Road Initiative: Review, analysis, and prospects. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 14, 20–39.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6304
DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2018.1457335
DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649
Syed, W. H. B. (2012). The role of China in economic stabilization and reconstruction of Afghanistan. Margalla Papers, 16(1), 27–48.
Szczepa?ski, J. (2018). OBOR and Chinese soft power. Polish Journal of Political Science, 4(2), 97–108.
Tahir, M. (2021). China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan: Partnership for regional peace. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 36(1), 165–178.
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1605225
Truman, E. M., Lawrence, R. Z., & Toohey, F. (2016). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Motives, scope, and challenges. Research Report.
DOI: 10.1515/9781474402187-009
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6
Vijayasri. (2013). The Importance of International Trade in The World. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research, 2(9), 111.
Woan-Lin, B., Wai-Mun, H., Shyue-Chuan, C., & Sim-Kuen, L. (2018). The future of Malaysia trade in One Belt One Road. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 265–271.
DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2019.1705882
Yamazawa, I. (1990). Economic Development and International Trade: The Japanese model.
DOI: 10.17265/2328-2134/2018.06.005
DOI: 10.3390/su10114131
DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.116179
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75435-2_12
DOI: 10.3390/su11020312
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12654
Zheng, S. (2020). Research on GM-LSTM Hybrid Model for Tourism Prediction Based on One Belt and One Road. 2020.
DOI: 10.1155/2022/3130605
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.001