CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Strategic alliance: The contribution of the “Belt and Road Initiative” to easing trade restrictions for Afghanistan

Guiliang Tian · Zaki Zakirullah ORCID ↗ · Haihua Ying

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 7 · 326-342

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS2

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations2Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers2Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:44 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

Afghanistan and most developing, landlocked countries must prioritize regional diplomacy and make strategic alliances to eliminate economic difficulties and create opportunities for trade, partnerships, and markets that will encourage further integration. This research aims to identify workable value chains for integration under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and evaluate their suitability by considering their potential volume. This research investigates how BRI is decreasing trade restrictions and increasing connectivity through the use of quantitative techniques and a survey research approach. The research results demonstrate that BRI can have a major impact on Afghanistan's economic situation, particularly with trade volume, trade restrictions, diplomacy, negotiations, and implementation of such kinds of projects. The Initiative has the potential to significantly reduce trade restrictions, and challenges, and enhance trade connectivity by utilizing significant infrastructure investments and investment in Afghanistan. However, security risks and political concerns prevent the BRI from achieving maximum connectivity in this country. This study contributes to thoughtful strategic alliances such as BRI can facilitate Afghanistan's trade connectivity, sustainable development, and economic integration by giving stakeholders and policymakers useful data to accomplish opportunities and know obstacles.

Keywords: {'name': 'Trade Connectivity, Trade Restrictions, Regional Integration, Sustainable Development, Belt and Road Initiative, Strategic Alliances'}

Authors & affiliations

Guiliang Tian
Affiliation not supplied

Zaki Zakirullah
Affiliation not supplied

Haihua Ying
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.29322/IJSRP.9.05.2019.p8932

Airan, F., & Rahimi, L. (2022). The prospects of Afghan-China economic relationship. Biruni Institute, 1–18.

DOI: 10.1504/JGBA.2019.099921

Anna, U. W. (2016). Theory and studies on diplomacy. Diplomatic Research, 127(4), 4–19.

DOI: 10.21511/ppm.14(2-2).2016.04

DOI: 10.4324/9780203702659

DOI: 10.1177/009207038801600107

DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2010.05.002

DOI: 10.1596/30477

DOI: 10.1017/S1816383111000051

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85931-2

DOI: 10.3390/economies8030054

DOI: 10.1057/s41267-017-0129-1

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2009939

DOI: 10.3390/economies6040062

Cacicedo, A. S. (2022). Afghanistan’s connectivity potential. Connectivity Research Report.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.01.007

Cao, Z. (2019). How to build and improve the tourism between China and Finland, whether the OBOR can promote it. Tourism Development Analysis Report.

DOI: 10.1111/mepo.12368

DOI: 10.1353/asp.2017.0023

DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2018.1439326

DOI: 10.1353/asp.2014.0012

Cowan, A. (2013). Afghanistan reconnected: Challenges and opportunities in the context of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Eastwest Institute Report.

Custer, S., Sethi, T., Solis, J. A., Lin, J. J., Ghose, S., Gupta, A., Knight, R., & Baehr, A. (2019). Silk Road Diplomacy: Deconstructing Beijing’s toolkit to influence South and Central Asia. Development Policy Review.

DOI: 10.22434/IFAMR2019.0115

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104910

DOI: 10.17016/ifdp.2020.1274

Development, U. N. C. O. T. A. (2019). Afghanistan rapid eTrade readiness assessment. Afghanistan Rapid eTrade Readiness Assessment.

DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2020.1731008

DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210916.027

DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210916.027

DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjx030

DOI: 10.33094/ijaefa.v13i1.611

DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00614-6

Fazli, S. (2023). The impact of Afghanistan’s drug trade on its neighbours. Research Report.

DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104

Fulton, J. (2016). An analysis of two corridors in China’s One Belt One Road Initiative: China-Pakistan and China Central-West Asia. Proceedings of International Conference on Inter-Regional Connectivity: South Asia and Central Asia, September, 43–49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319900179

DOI: 10.1344/jesb2019.2.j062

DOI: 10.1002/tie.22169

DOI: 10.1017/S1062798721000296

Haiqing Huang. (2018). China’s image in the Belt and Road Initiative. International Perspective.

DOI: 10.3390/su15087012

Hameed, S. (2012). Prospects for Indian-Pakistan cooperation in Afghanistan. Research Report.

DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202315704004

Harsh, V. P., & Premesha, S. (2021). Mapping the Belt and Road Initiative reach, implementations, consequences. Observer Research Foundation, 102.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4291992

DOI: 10.21275/SR23109202519

DOI: 10.1142/S1793969012500094

Holzmann, A. (2017). China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative: A discourse analysis of speeches by Chinese politicians and Indonesian newspaper articles. Analysis Report.

Hosseinzadah, B. (2021). U.S. public diplomacy towards Afghanistan (2001–2021). Research Article, 8(2).

DOI: 10.24052/IJBED/V06NU02/ART-03

Khalil, A. B. (2017). Linking Afghanistan to China’s Belt and Road. The Diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2017/04/linking-afghanistan-to-chinas-belt-and-road/?allpages=yes&print=yes

DOI: 10.47362/EJSSS.2023.4202

DOI: 10.35935/tax/24.4233

Kvedaras, V., Astudillo, J., & Astudillo, J. (2019). Journal pre-proof. Journal of Pre-proof.

Lam, T.-D. (2015). A review of modern trade theories. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(6), 604–614.

Leamer, E. E. (1995). The Heckscher-Ohlin model in theory and practice. International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.

Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

DOI: 10.51461/projectbaikal.72.1986

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.02.002

DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.97.3.562

DOI: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00084-5

Mukut, M. (2017). Bangladesh and China’s ambitious One-Belt, One-Road (OBOR) initiative. Research Report.

Munadi, S. M. (2018). The OBOR project: Economic initiatives around Afghanistan—Cooperation or competitions between stakeholders. Unam, 449–471.

Otmakhova, K. (2017). The Belt and Road for all: Rethinking globalization-driven urban development in Khorgos. TUDelft Repository.

DOI: 10.1257/aer.20140832

DOI: 10.59670/jns.v33i.608

DOI: 10.18615/anadolu.1310061

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8460

DOI: 10.3126/ijssm.v7i3.29964

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i12.11508

Russel, D. R., & Berger, B. H. (2020). Weaponizing the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Policy Society Institute, 1–64.

Russel, D. R., Berger, B. H., Chance, A., & Mafinezam, A. (2016). American perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative. Institute for China-America Studies, 1–64.

Safi, M., & Alizada, B. (2018). Integrating Afghanistan into the Belt and Road Initiative: Review, analysis, and prospects. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 14, 20–39.

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6304

DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2018.1457335

DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649

Syed, W. H. B. (2012). The role of China in economic stabilization and reconstruction of Afghanistan. Margalla Papers, 16(1), 27–48.

Szczepa?ski, J. (2018). OBOR and Chinese soft power. Polish Journal of Political Science, 4(2), 97–108.

Tahir, M. (2021). China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan: Partnership for regional peace. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 36(1), 165–178.

DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303

DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1605225

Truman, E. M., Lawrence, R. Z., & Toohey, F. (2016). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Motives, scope, and challenges. Research Report.

DOI: 10.1515/9781474402187-009

DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6

Vijayasri. (2013). The Importance of International Trade in The World. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research, 2(9), 111.

Woan-Lin, B., Wai-Mun, H., Shyue-Chuan, C., & Sim-Kuen, L. (2018). The future of Malaysia trade in One Belt One Road. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 265–271.

DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2019.1705882

Yamazawa, I. (1990). Economic Development and International Trade: The Japanese model.

DOI: 10.17265/2328-2134/2018.06.005

DOI: 10.3390/su10114131

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.116179

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75435-2_12

DOI: 10.3390/su11020312

DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12654

Zheng, S. (2020). Research on GM-LSTM Hybrid Model for Tourism Prediction Based on One Belt and One Road. 2020.

DOI: 10.1155/2022/3130605

DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.001