An exploratory lens in integrating social innovation in public healthcare ecosystem
Tony Ngwenya
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 7 · 421-429
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The health care system provides hope and livelihoods to its direct customers, who are the patients. The role of social innovation needs to take front and centre stage by authorities and practitioners tasked with decision-making and problem-solving tasks from a strategic perspective. The social innovation realm has demonstrated its ability to accelerate social value within public-oriented institutions. An interpretivism philosophical approach of qualitative methodology predicated on the inductive theory-building approach was undertaken to solicit empirical data from budget decision-making health practitioners. The research presented a thematic analytical evaluation of the data set from twelve participants holding various influential healthcare positions. The study's findings indicated a huge gap in integrating social innovation and associated entrepreneurial mindset. The procurement decision-making of produce and commodities could mitigate the social ills of joblessness, poverty and quality of life. Furthermore, the findings illuminated the lack of systemic resources and investment that could be driven by social innovation and entrepreneurial inclusion from the surrounding SMMEs. The multi-disciplinary approach will have to be a priority. At the same time, a tactically diverse strategic thrust from leadership and management could be a game-changer and a de-risking intervention in bolstering the local economic development for the SMMEs within the agricultural sector value chain.
Keywords: {'name': 'Social innovation, healthcare integration, primary agriculture, SMMEs \t \t localization'}
Authors & affiliations
Tony Ngwenya
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v11n2p232
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S360852
DOI: 10.1201/9781003097945-16
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115314
Baharun, R., Mi, T. J., Streimikiene, D., Mardani, A., Shakeel, J., & Nitsenko, V. S. (2019). Innovation in healthcare performance among private brand’s healthcare services in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
DOI: 10.7896/j.1209
DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-262
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x
Clark, K. R., & Vealé, B. L. (2018). Strategies to enhance data collection and analysis in qualitative research. Radiologic technology, 89(5), 482CT-485CT.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
DOI: 10.1186/s40249-021-00804-9
Edmiston, D., Aro, J., Havas, A., & Molnár, G. (2016). Public Policy, Social Innovation and Marginalisation in Europe.
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0
DOI: 10.4135/9781529622737
DOI: 10.4324/9781315609478
Gichuru, M. J. (2017). The interpretive research paradigm: A critical review of research methodologies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 4(2), 1-5.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83864-5_7
DOI: 10.1186/s40852-017-0062-3
DOI: 10.1186/s40249-019-0592-y
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102206
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2014.051.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.030
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8_24
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dav076
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2017.1295365
Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., MacCallum, D., & Leubolt, B. (2017). Social innovation as a trigger for transformations-the role of research. Publications Office of the European Union.
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11278-4
DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000902
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Young Foundation.
DOI: 10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.35
Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) Q1:2024 of Statistics South Africa. Online: https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0211/Presentation%20QLFS%20Q1%2020 24.pdf . Accessed 15 July 2024.
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093
Reyes, M. V. (2020). The disproportional impact of COVID-19 on African Americans. Health and human rights, 22(2), 299.
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-022-09471-y
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow, England; Pearson.
Sheela, S. C., ArulDoss, S. P. S., Infanta, S. J., & Ilakkiya, U. S. (2022). Digitalization in India: Trends and Challenges. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5852-5860. http://journalppw.com
Socha-Dietrich, K. (2021). Empowering the health workforce to make the most of the digital revolution.
DOI: 10.4135/9781526430212.n2
DOI: 10.3316/QRJ1102063
DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1372926
DOI: 10.1186/s40249-021-00794-8