The adoption of information technology governance frameworks by universities in Gauteng province, South Africa
Percy Masibigiri ORCID ↗ · Alex Dandadzi ORCID ↗ · Solly Seeletse
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 7 · 492-499
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Lately, there has been a rise in personal and commercial use of computer devices, be it mobile phones, laptops, or any other computing devices, not forgetting the network, networking peripherals, and software that these devices function with. That being said, it has led organisations and institutions of higher learning to establish and adhere to Information Technology governance frameworks set out by the government and the higher education sector. White and Greiner (2022) defined Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) as an Information Technology (IT) service management framework that outlines best practices for delivering IT services. Kidd (2019) defined Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT) as an IT management framework developed by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA) to help businesses develop, organize, and implement strategies around information management and IT governance. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ITIL and COBIT, as IT governance frameworks recommended by the higher education sector in South Africa, were adopted by ICT departments in universities in Gauteng province, South Africa. Data collection was done using a questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent via email to 52 potential respondents from all the higher institutions in Gauteng. A total of 41 questionnaires were returned. The questionnaire for both ITIL and COBIT frameworks was designed using Google Forms. The study findings showed that universities in Gauteng have adopted ITIL and COBIT as ICT governance frameworks recommended by the Higher Education sector in South Africa. The study's results are crucial for university administrators as they might improve comprehension of the factors affecting the adoption, administration, and utilization of ICT resources to enhance the university's capacities
Keywords: {'name': 'Information Technology Infrastructure Library, Information Technology, Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, Information Systems Audit and Control Association'}
Authors & affiliations
Percy Masibigiri
Affiliation not supplied
Alex Dandadzi
Affiliation not supplied
Solly Seeletse
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
References
Blanche, T., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (2014). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd.
CISR. (2012). IT governance. Retrieved from http://cisr.mit.edu/research/research-overview/classic-topics/it-governance/ (Accessed: 05 March 2024).
DOI: 10.1080/08975930903405183
COBIT 5 Framework Publications | ISACA. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit/cobit-5 (Accessed: 02 March 2024).
Hanover Research Council. (2009). Best practices in online teaching strategies. Washington, DC: Academy Administration Practice.
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-76
Kidd, C. (2019). What is COBIT? COBIT explained. Retrieved from https://www.bmc.com/blogs/cobit/ (Accessed: 15 May 2024).
Mingay, S., Spafford, G., & Wheeler, J. (2012). Updates in COBIT 5 aim for greater relevance to wider business audience. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/doc/1982323/updates-cobit--aim-greater (Accessed: 02 March 2024).
DOI: 10.2307/25148829
Oxford University Press. (2008). Oxford business English dictionary. ISBN-13: 978-0-19-431584-5.
Public Service Corporate Governance of Information and Communication Technology Policy Framework. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.dpsa.gov.za/policy-updates/e-gov/ps_corporate_governance_of_ict/policy/ (Accessed: 03 March 2024).
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
The Chartered Governance Institute. (2024). Understanding governance. Retrieved from https://www.cgi.org.uk/professional-development/discover-governance/looking-to-start-a-career-in-governance/what-is-governance (Accessed: 20 May 2024).
Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
White, S., & Greiner, L. (2022). What is ITIL? Your guide to the IT infrastructure library. Retrieved from https://www.cio.com/article/272361/infrastructure-it-infrastructure-library-itil-definition-and-solutions.html (Accessed: 15 May 2024).
Yanckello, R., & Brown, M. (2023). Hype cycle for higher education, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/4547099 (Accessed: 06 March 2024).