Challenges and Approaches to Overcoming Educational Barriers in a Distance Learning Environment

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and assess the specific challenges faced by incarcerated students in a distance learning environment and to explore effective strategies for managing their academic endeavors. The study intentionally selected twelve incarcerated inmates who were currently enrolled in various educational programs. The data were acquired through the process of conducting audio-recorded interviews, which were then transcribed verbatim by a proficient transcriber. The author employed an interpretive paradigm to examine the data and derive significant conclusions. The findings demonstrated that the amalgamation of resilience and determination had a crucial role in empowering students to overcome the barriers impeding their education. In addition, students have employed controlled internet access in prisons and the incorporation of technology-enhanced learning alongside traditional classroom teaching as essential methods to properly manage their academic studies. These strategies prioritize the need to enhance the accessibility of educational resources and support networks within prisons in order to enhance the educational accomplishments of incarcerated individuals. The study's findings suggest that it is crucial to make practical and policy changes in order to effectively meet the specific needs of incarcerated students engaged in remote learning programs.  Typical barriers include (i) restricted technology access, (ii) limited finances, and (iii) the challenge of staying focused in a distracting setting. Notwithstanding these challenges, the participants shown exceptional tenacity and resolve, utilizing diverse tactics to effectively handle their academic pursuits. The success of these individuals was influenced by several key variables, such as the assistance provided by prison education officers, the capacity to effectively employ restricted technical tools, and the self-discipline to establish organized study routines.

Keywords: {'name': 'Distance learning'}, {'name': 'incarcerated students'}, {'name': 'educational challenges'}, {'name': 'resilience strategies'}, {'name': 'correctional education'}

Authors & affiliations

Vimbi Petrus Mahlangu
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2019.030585

Beaudoin, M. F. (2015). Distance education leadership in the context of digital change. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 33–44.

DOI: 10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6

Brazzell, D., Crayton, A., Mukamal, D. A., Solomon, A. L., & Lindahl, N. (2022). From the classroom to the community: Connecting the dots for successful prisoner reentry. Urban Institute.

Coley, R. J., & Barton, P. E. (2006). Locked up and locked out: An educational perspective on the U.S. prison population. Educational Testing Service.

DOI: 10.18546/LRE.12.2.03

DOI: 10.7249/RR266

DOI: 10.7249/RR564

DOI: 10.4018/IJMBL.2016040101

Farley, H. (2017). Supporting incarcerated students to successfully complete tertiary studies: A resilience-based approach. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(1), 1–16.

DOI: 10.4018/IJMBL.2017040103

Farley, H. (2019). The use of mobile technologies to overcome digital inequities in prison education: A pilot project. Journal of Correctional Education, 70(1), 49–63.

Farley, H., & Pike, A. (2016). Engaging prisoners in education: Reducing risk and recidivism. Australasian Journal of Correctional Staff Development, 11(1), 30–37.

Farley, H., & Pike, A. (2016). Engaging prisoners in education: Reducing risk and recidivism. Advancing Corrections Journal, 1, 65–73.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0468-1_39-1

DOI: 10.15845/jper.v3i1.922

Farley, H., & Pike, A. (2018). Postsecondary education in Australian prisons: Examining the postgraduate experience. Journal of Correctional Education, 69(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/26508007

Farley, H., & Willems, J. (2017). Addressing the outsider-within problem in prison education. Advancing Corrections, 3, 102–111.

Hagley-Dickinson, L. (2024). Educational leadership: Reducing offending amongst incarcerated juveniles. Open Research Online.

Hawley, J., Murphy, I., & Souto-Otero, M. (2013). Prison education and training in Europe: Current state-of-play and challenges. European Commission.

Herried, C. F. (2011). Case study teaching. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 493–496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_293

DOI: 10.1145/3649217.3653632

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37737-3_14

Ktoridou, D., Epaminonda, E., & Yiannakou, A. (2018). Exploring the integration of case-based learning into an ICT course. In P. Isaías, D. Kommers, & I. Iadis (Eds.), International Conferences on Internet Technologies & Society 2018 (ITS 2018), Educational Technologies 2018 (ICEduTech 2018) and Sustainability, Technology and Education 2018 (STE 2018) (pp. 19–26). IADIS.

Leenders, M. R., Mauffette-Leenders, L. A., & Erskine, J. A. (2001). Writing cases. Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.

LePage, J. P. (2024). Employment outcomes of a distance learning system for formerly incarcerated veterans with mental illness. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.12.0268

Lin, X., Johnston, J., Renner, W., & Ness, G. (2023). Using a student-developed case study activity for online discussion guided by a three-tier case method model. Refereed Articles, 150–160.

Littlefield, J. (2018). Characteristics of successful distance learners. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/characteristics-of-successful-distance-learners-1097959

Lyons, R., & Bandura, R. P. (2020). Increasing student engagement in online courses with interactive learning activities. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 14(1), 106–117.

DOI: 10.1145/3613904.3642717

DOI: 10.1145/3613904.3642717

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4981638

DOI: 10.1163/9789004446793_008

DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12290

Prisoners' Education Trust. (2017). Prison university partnerships in learning. Retrieved from https://www.prisonerseducation.org.uk/prison-university-partnerships-in-learning/

Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089

Ross-Gordon, J. M., Rose, A. D., & Kasworm, C. E. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of adult and continuing education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Ross-Gordon, J. M., Rose, A. D., & Kasworm, C. E. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of adult and continuing education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021018038

Rudenko, E., Bachieva, R., & Alferova, A. (2021). Distance learning during the pandemic: Managing the challenges. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i2.3590

DOI: 10.37514/ATD-J.2018.15.3.12

Shilling, R. (2019). The challenges of distance learning. eLearners. Retrieved from https://www.elearners.com/education-resources/distance-learning/the-challenges-of-distance-learning/

Steurer, S. J., & Smith, L. G. (2003). Education reduces crime: Three-state recidivism study - Executive summary. Correctional Education Association.

Vacca, J. S. (2004). Educated prisoners are less likely to return to prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 55(4), 297–305.