The emergence of artificial intelligence in the higher education

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review analysing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on higher education, focusing on its methods, results, and implications. By synthesising a diverse range of academic papers, the review explores how AI technologies influence educational standards and practices in higher education institutions. Findings reveal that AI has the potential to enhance the quality of higher education by diversifying teaching responsibilities, customising learning experiences, and employing intelligent, adaptive teaching strategies. These capabilities position AI as a transformative tool for improving educational delivery and outcomes. However, the study also highlights significant challenges associated with integrating AI into higher education. These challenges include delineating the appropriate scope of AI use, addressing inequalities in access to digital resources, and ensuring adequate training and support for educators and students. The review underscores the importance of understanding these complexities to guide the development of effective strategies and policies that optimise AI's potential while mitigating its limitations. The review offers critical insights into the dual role of AI in higher education, where it can either advance or hinder educational standards depending on how it is implemented. By examining the advantages, limitations, and broader consequences of AI-powered instructional tools, this study provides a comprehensive perspective on the intricate relationship between AI and educational quality. The findings aim to inform educators, policymakers, and stakeholders about the opportunities and challenges of adopting AI in higher education, contributing to the development of inclusive, innovative, and sustainable educational practices.

Keywords: {'name': 'higher education'}, {'name': 'artificial intelligence'}, {'name': 'constructivism'}, {'name': 'quality'}, {'name': 'teaching and learning outcomes'}, {'name': 'student involvement'}

Authors & affiliations

Oluwatoyin Ajani
Affiliation not supplied

Morakinyo Akintolu
Affiliation not supplied

Sunday Oluwafemi Afolabi
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Ajani, O. A. (2023a). Exploring strategies for effective self-regulated learning in students’ use of online learning for quality learning. Webology, 20(3).

DOI: 10.53615/2232-5697.13.113-127

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3355

DOI: 10.33902/JPSP.202528400

DOI: 10.53449/ije.v7i1.328

DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v11n4p80

DOI: 10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2

DOI: 10.21428/cb6ab371.b8fc485a

DOI: 10.3390/su13020800

DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2021-1313

DOI: 10.58459/rptel.2023.18002

DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chu, H., Tu, Y., & Yang, K. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7889

DOI: 10.1155/2022/3899413

DOI: 10.46303/ressat.2021.39

DOI: 10.1108/TR-02-2019-0062

DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.078

DOI: 10.53841/bpsptr.2017.23.2.95

Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting inclusive learning using chatbots? A chatbot-led interview study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 33(1), 98–108.

DOI: 10.1108/CR-03-2021-0045

DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00400-8

DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-02-2020-0054

DOI: 10.53615/2232-5697.13.93-104

DOI: 10.1007/s11251-015-9366-5

DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00317-3

Li, D., Tong, T. W., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Is China emerging as the global leader in AI? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/02/is-china-emerging-as-the-global-leader-in-ai

DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348

DOI: 10.3390/educsci9010051

Maphalala, M. C., & Ajani, O. A. (2023). The COVID-19 pandemic: Shifting from conventional classroom learning to online learning in South Africa’s higher education. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (2(38)).

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1066-3.ch005

DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4827

DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30092024/8236a

DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v17i01.18037

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71

DOI: 10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

PRISMA Statement. (2021). PRISMA endorsers. PRISMA statement website. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Endorsement/PRISMAEndorsers

Rutner, S. M., & Scott, R. A. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence to grade student discussion boards: An exploratory study. Information Systems Education Journal, 20(4), 4–18.

DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010

DOI: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i13.5514

DOI: 10.47841/icorad.v1i2.46

DOI: 10.51201/JUSST/22/0154

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.704256

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.015

Yang, A. C. M., Chen, I. Y. L., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2021). Automatic generation of cloze items for repeated testing to improve reading comprehension. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 147–158.

DOI: 10.1155/2022/2156111

DOI: 10.25236/FER.2021.040120

DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.947731

DOI: 10.1155/2022/8503239

DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022483

DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2022.2102175