Article-based thesis or thesis by monograph? Supervisors’ views on the route to completion of doctoral studies

Abstract

The growth in the use of article-based theses, when compared to the traditional monograph-style thesis raises the question why students, supervisors and academic institutions are pursuing this particular route. This study explores the views of experienced supervisors involved in doctoral studies. The study aims to explore the advantages, disadvantages, caveats and various routes that doctoral students can take in completing their thesis. The study was exploratory in nature, employing a qualitative research design and made use of semi-structured interviews with nine doctoral supervisors from Canada. Data was collected from experienced doctoral supervisors from Canada, selected by means of a snowball sampling approach. Data was analysed by means of thematic content analysis. Findings show that supervisors preferred the sandwich-based thesis approach, as it allowed for more rapid time to completion. In addition, the main benefits for both institution and student included having a larger volume of published research output at the end of the doctoral supervision process, as well as more rapid career advancement owing to development of both research and soft skills. The finds hold value for universities who are considering an article-based thesis as an alternative to the traditional monograph style, as well as universities who have not used this option extensively. Findings also provide an impetus for supervisors and faculties in management education to adopt the article-based thesis approach more widely and rapidly owing to the multitude of benefits it holds. 

Keywords: {'name': 'Doctoral supervision, article-based thesis, supervision approach'}

Authors & affiliations

Chris Schachtebeck
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1002/nur.20420

DOI: 10.14296/ac.v2i2.5257

DOI: 10.1177/0969733014531529

DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9

Dudley-Evans, T. (1999). The dissertation: A case of neglect? In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in EAP Writing Research and Instruction (pp. 28-36). Reading University: CALS.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192219

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.04.003

Gabriel, Y. (2019). The changing character of the management PhD and some reflections on how to arrest its descent to hollow virtuosity in producing meaningless texts. Management, 22(4), 703-710.

DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12374

DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1693517

DOI: 10.18261/njdl.17.2.1

DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20200100

DOI: 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0057

DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2024.2389357

DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1498461

DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs172

DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00025-9

Radafsha, G. H., Sobhani, A. R., & Sadegh, F. (2010). Survey the attitudes towards thesis writing process among students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, 19(74), 86-97.

Remenyi, D. (2015). The monograph dissertation versus the papers approach. Alternation, 22(1), 327–335.

Rowland, J. (2017). Practical academic: Delivering a thesis by publication. United States: Practical Academic.

DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2024.2363036

DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12504

DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2110575

DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.3.648

DOI: 10.1080/03075070601004358