The application of digital technologies in external auditing: a double edged sword?
Favourate Y Mpofu ORCID ↗ · Queen Mpofu ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025 · Vol. 7 / Issue 1 · 39-56
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:28 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:28 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The adoption of digital technologies in external auditing has become increasingly common and significant in the digital era, revolutionizing audit practices and offering several opportunities. This study explores whether the application of digital technologies in external auditing presents a double-edged sword, with the ability to transform and disrupt the audit profession. Through a comprehensive examination of the likely opportunities and challenges of the digital transformation of the external audit function, this study sought to provide an insightful discussion of the dual nature of the implications of digital technologies. The aim of this study is to not only provide a balanced assessment of the application of digital technologies in external auditing but also to recommend possible ways for auditors, auditee companies, and other stakeholders to reap maximum benefits from the use of digital technologies, including how these various stakeholders can navigate the associated challenges effectively. Opportunities stemming from the application of digital technologies include the enhancement of audit quality, improved accuracy in audit procedures, increased efficiency and effectiveness, heightened comprehensiveness and extensiveness in risk assessment, and an increased degree of confidence in the audited financial statements by stakeholders (reduction in the audit expectation gap). On the downside, challenges and risks concern the lack of or the need for new skills and competencies for auditors, technological complexities linked to digital technologies, cybersecurity risks, overdependence on technology affecting audit quality, audit evidence, professional skepticism, and the widening of the audit expectation gap. To maximize the possible benefits and minimize risks, this study recommends continuous professional development, capacity building through education, training and collaboration, better technology and data governance initiatives, and continuous assessment of risks.
Keywords: {'name': ': Challenges, Double-edged sword, Digital Technologies, External Auditing, Opportunities'}
Authors & affiliations
Favourate Y Mpofu
Affiliation not supplied
Queen Mpofu
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/012164
Agnew, W., Lee, H., Jang, M., Gavrilovska, A., & Schwan, K. (2016). Drawing insights from "big data" machine learning literature using textual features: Why are some novels considered to be literature? A predictive model of literary judgments shows that textual features are important.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_14
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_17
Alacron, A. J., & Ng, C. (2018). Blockchain and the future of accounting. Pennsylvania CPA Journal.
Al-Aroud, S. F. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence technologies on audit evidence. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 24, 1–11.
DOI: 10.5267/j.ac.2021.2.009
Alipourfallahpasand, A., & Asgari, S. (2020). Emerging technologies in the audit environment: Use and perceived importance among independent auditors. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 4(2), 103–119.
DOI: 10.5267/j.ac.2020.12.003
DOI: 10.2308/isys-52660
DOI: 10.31009/hipertext.net.2023.i26.10
DOI: 10.1002/isaf.277
DOI: 10.17265/1548-6583/2020.05.002
Botez, D. (2018). Recent challenges for auditors: Using data analytics in the audit of financial statements. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 9(4), 61–71.
DOI: 10.32602/jafas.2022.023
Brunskill, E. (2019). Computers that learn to help. Human Centred Artificial Intelligence Symposium, Stanford.
DOI: 10.2308/jeta-10718
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107018
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12407
CPA. (2017). Deep learning and the future of auditing: How an evolving technology could transform analysis and improve judgment. CPA Journal.
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-01-2018-1773
DOI: 10.2308/jeta-10494
De Mauro, A., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Nobili, G. (2016). Beyond data scientists: A review of big data skills and job families. Proceedings of IFKAD, 1844–1857.
DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-10-2021-0202
Deloitte. (2020). Technology industry outlook: As cloud and AI deployments rise, edge computing is poised to join the mix. Available at www.deloitte.com/content
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52403-5_9
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3838.12265
Dickey, G., Blanke, S., & Seaton, L. (2019). Machine learning in auditing. The CPA Journal, 16–21.
DOI: 10.1177/0956797620948841
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.05.002
El Badlaoui, A., Naji, S., & Chegri, B. (2023). The audit expectation gap in developed and developing countries: Components and reduction factors. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD), 5(09), 22–44.
El-Monem Serag, A. A., & Al-Aqiliy, L. M. (2020). A proposed framework for big data analytics in external auditing and its impact on audit quality with a field study in Egypt. Alexandria Journal of Accounting Research, 4(3), 1–60. https://aljalexu.journals.ekb.eg/article_124109.htm
Fadaly, D. (2023). Investigating the impact of digital transformation of external auditing on their business in the Egyptian context. Alexandria Journal of Accounting Research, 7(2), 103–140.
Fang, Q., & Gao, S. (2022). Data-based audit approach: The supply-side reform of auditing driven by digital technology. Journal of Contemporary Finance and Economics, (1), 124.
Fotoh, L. E., & Lorentzon, J. I. (2020). Critical issues of the audit expectation gap in the era of audit digitalization. In Proceedings of Hawai’i Accounting Research Conference (HARC), 1–32. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/49c8cdcd-d14c-493c-9dad-063a9ccb4d1a
DOI: 10.2308/HORIZONS-2021-027
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4702319
Fukas, P., Rebstadt, J., Remark, F., & Thomas, O. (2021). Developing an artificial intelligence maturity model for auditing. In 29th European Conference on Information Systems Research Papers.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-12-2019-2513
DOI: 10.1016/j.acclit.2017.05.003
DOI: 10.3390/ai1020008
Herath, S. K., & Joshi, P. L. (2023). Audit data analytics: A game changer for audit firms. International Journal of Auditing and Accounting Studies. Special Issue on Auditing in the Digital Age, 5(1), 29–48.
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100433
Ibrahim, K. (2024). Bridging skill gap of future accountant that fits with Industry 4.0. Journal of African Innovation and Advanced Studies.
IFAC. (2015). Exploring artificial intelligence and the accounting profession. Opportunity, threat, both, neither? Available at www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway-/preparing-future-ready-professionals/discussion/exploring-artificial-intelligence-accounting-profession-opportunity-threat-both-neither
DOI: 10.2308/jeta-10511
DOI: 10.5937/StraMan2104028I
DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200312.334
DOI: 10.1111/auar.12305
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100431
DOI: 10.2308/jeta-51730
DOI: 10.2308/HORIZONS-19-145
DOI: 10.1108/PAR-06-2021-0107
DOI: 10.1109/MC.2021.3067225
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3778998
KPMG. (2019). Learning and the audit: Rise of machines. Available at https://home.kpmg/au/en/home/insights/2019/04/audit-technology-machine-learning
Lacity, M., & Willcocks, L. P. (2018). Robotic process and cognitive automation: The next phase. SB Publishing.
DOI: 10.1177/0268396221990778
DOI: 10.1037/amp0000972
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3877347
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0207
DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-08-2021-1399
DOI: 10.31617/visnik.knute.2020(131)09
DOI: 10.3390/su13115788
DOI: 10.3390/su14137804
DOI: 10.3390/educsci10070180
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2019.04.002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-76313-8_7
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-76313-8_6
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i9.2737
Mpofu, F. Y. (2021). Review articles: A critical review of the pitfalls and guidelines to effectively conducting and reporting reviews. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 18, 550.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52403-5_11
DOI: 10.24193/subbnegotia.2024.1.01
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1
DOI: 10.5937/ekonomika2103075M
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202110001001
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202110702001
Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a literature review research paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 03(01), 47-56.
Rebstadt, J., Remark, F., Fukas, P., Meier, P., & Thomas, O. (2022). Towards personalized explanations for AI systems: Designing a role model for explainable AI in auditing.
DOI: 10.2308/isys-51805
Rickett, L. K. (2017). The use of big data in auditing and barriers to adoption. Business Faculty Publications, 62(3-4), 319. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/bus_facpub/31
Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). How robotic process automation is transforming accounting and auditing. The CPA Journal, 88(6), 46-49.
DOI: 10.33516/maj.v57i9.26-29p
DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2021.1882320
DOI: 10.55197/qjssh.v2i4.89
Seethamraju, R. C., & Hecimovic, A. (2020). Impact of artificial intelligence on auditing: An exploratory study.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72651-5_43
DOI: 10.58729/1941-6679.1477
DOI: 10.52728/ijtc.v1i3.101
DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.100288
Tiron-Tudor, A., & Deliu, D. (2022). Reflections on the human-algorithm complex duality perspectives in the auditing process. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 19(3), 255-285.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29739-8_22
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4950-9.ch009
Uglum, M. K. (2021). Consideration of the ethical implications of artificial intelligence in the audit profession.
DOI: 10.9734/ajeba/2019/v10i130099
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100676
DOI: 10.5937/AnEkSub2300014V
DOI: 10.2308/JETA-2022-072
DOI: 10.25236/IJNDES.2023.070303
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104327