Gender equality in South African higher education: A scholarly analysis of the National Development Plan

Abstract

This study offers a thorough examination of South Africa's National Development Plan (NDP), emphasising its dedication to advancing gender equality in higher education. Notwithstanding constitutional assurances of equality, considerable gender discrepancies endure in South African higher education institutions (HEIs), with women encountering institutional obstacles that impede their entry and achievement. The research utilises a systematic review approach, consolidating current academic literature to discern the problems and opportunities related to the NDP's gender equality objectives. Critical findings indicate that structural obstacles, including socio-cultural views and financial limitations, substantially hinder women's engagement in higher education. The under-representation of women in leadership positions within higher education institutions fosters a cycle of inequity, as cultural beliefs and institutional regulations frequently neglect the distinct problems encountered by female students. The investigation underscores the necessity of employing an intersectional approach to comprehend the intricacies of gender inequality in higher education. This study emphasises the importance of executing targeted interventions and unified national policies to cultivate an inclusive educational environment that empowers women and corresponds with the overarching objectives of sustainable development. By resolving these difficulties, South Africa can advance towards genuine gender equality in its higher education system, thereby fostering national development and social progress.

Keywords: {'name': 'Gender Equality'}, {'name': 'Higher Education'}, {'name': 'National Development Plan (NDP)'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}

Authors & affiliations

Andile Sokani
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.46627/silet.v4i3.231

DOI: 10.20853/37-2-5001

DOI: 10.20853/30-1-557

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02731

DOI: 10.1177/09610006221127023

DOI: 10.61093/bel.7(3).108-119.2023

DOI: 10.38159/ehass.202341210

DOI: 10.1177/1086296X16683474

DOI: 10.21303/2504-5571.2023.003051

DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2022.v04i03.004

DOI: 10.20853/33-5-3602

DOI: 10.1177/1470595810384588

DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2019.1698445

DOI: 10.38140/pie.v41i4.7471

DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1704

DOI: 10.38140/pie.v42i1.7232

DOI: 10.38159/ehass.20234132

DOI: 10.54097/ehss.v8i.4479

DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1045458

DOI: 10.38140/ijss-2024.vol4.02

DOI: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.17

DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1981199

DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3398

DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122023/8081

DOI: 10.36315/2023v2end062

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05334

DOI: 10.25159/2520-9515/13294

DOI: 10.9770/IRD.2023.5.4(4)

DOI: 10.53894/ijirss.v6i2.1218

DOI: 10.1080/20004508.2018.1424490

DOI: 10.38159/ehass.2022SP31110

DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.22.8.5

DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12137

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61196-8

DOI: 10.25159/2663-5895/15087