Exploring the use of technological innovations in agricultural farms: a case of South Africa
Sipho Makgopa
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024 · Vol. 13 / Issue 10 · 99-104
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Agricultural farms play a crucial role in providing food security in South Africa and other parts of the world. These agricultural farms are faced with challenges such as stock theft, equipment theft and armed robberies. This paper aimed to explore the use of technological innovations on agricultural farms to detect and prevent crime. Complexity theory was adopted to achieve the aim of the paper. Qualitative research was adopted to achieve the research objective and in-depth interviews were conducted with farm managers in South Africa. Content analysis was used with the aid of Atlas.ti version 8 to analyse the primary data. The findings uncovered that technological innovation devices such as motion sensors, monitoring surveillance camera devices and drones are used on agricultural farms. Despite these devices' use, agricultural farms face security budget constraints. This paper makes a significant contribution by offering recommendations to key stakeholders and directions for future research on the topic.
Keywords: {'name': 'crop theft, content analysis, drone, farm, livestock theft, technological innovation'}
Authors & affiliations
Sipho Makgopa
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Alrousan, E., & Faqir, R. S. (2023). The evolution of anticipatory policing in the United Arab Emirates: Proactive crime prevention and technology. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 15(4).
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azz029
Brynard, P. A., & Hanekom, S. X. (2006). Introduction to research in management related field (2nd ed.). Van Schaik, South Africa.
Byrne, J., & Marx, G. (2011). Technological innovations in crime prevention and policing: A review of the research on implementation and impact. Journal of Police Studies, 20(3), 17–40. https://faculty.uml.edu/jbyrne/documents/Technological-Innovations-in-Crime-Prevention-and-Policing.-A-Review-of-the-Research-on-Impl.pdf
DOI: 10.4324/9780429352775-3
DOI: 10.1177/0734016817724504
DOI: 10.1177/1477370812457763
Chidziwisano, G. H. (2022). Investigating the role of sensor-based technologies to support domestic activities in Sub-Saharan Africa (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2659591758?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173584
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-7065-3
Eurostat. (2024). Use of ICT at work and activities performed. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/isoc_iw_ (Accessed: 20 June 2024)
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2017). FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical Databases. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home/ (Accessed: 20 June 2023).
DOI: 10.1002/9781118519639.wbecp274
DOI: 10.1177/14613557211064053
DOI: 10.1108/9781787691711
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th global ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdaa009
DOI: 10.1177/0887403406294586
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson, South Africa.
DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2016.1217776
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.151
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.003
DOI: 10.1108/IJES-03-2017-0012
DOI: 10.1057/s41300-019-00073-7
Tustin, D. H., Ligthelm, A., Martins, J. H., & Van Wyk, H. De J. (2005). Marketing research in practice (1st ed.). Pretoria, South Africa: Unisa Press.
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119957
Weisheit, R. A., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (2000). Change and continuity in crime in rural America. Criminal Justice, 1(1), 309–357. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph-Donnermeyer/publication/237429911_Change_and_Continuity_in_Crime_in_Rural_America/links/5478a7760cf2a961e4877c4d/Change-and-Continuity-in-Crime-in-Rural-America.pdf