The ideal 4th Industrial Revolution lecturer in South African Universities

Abstract

In this concept paper, the researcher argues that socio-economic and technological changes in the world today have severe implications for the type of lecturer who should be found in the lecture halls in the 21st Century and 4th Industrial Revolution. The 'ideal 4th Industrial Revolution lecturer' is not just a vision but a necessity for a technologically adept, adaptable, and innovative lecturer who can effectively navigate the rapidly changing educational landscape. This 'ideal 21st-Century modern-day lecturer' is a term used to describe a lecturer who is not only well-versed in their subject matter but also proficient in the use of technology, adaptable to change, and innovative in their teaching methods. Exposing students to lecturers who have not been trained to deal with changes in the outside world is tantamount to having the wrong men and women in charge of students in the ever-changing world. In the paper, the researcher interrogates the ideal 21st-century modern-day lecturer. The paper examines content, teaching approaches, the changes in the 21st-Century socio-political, economic, and technological environment and how they demand a responsive lecturer. The lecturer's role in responding to these changes is to adapt their teaching methods, incorporate new technologies, and foster innovation in their students. In the light of the issues raised in the discussions, recommendations are made. The researcher used desktop research. Desktop research is another name for secondary research. The researcher used two types of research activity: primary research (where the researcher goes out and discovers stuff) and secondary research (where the researcher reviews what other people have done). Desktop research is not about collecting data. Instead, the researcher’s role is to conduct desktop research to review previous research findings to gain a broad understanding of the field. The 21st Century is marked by rapid social, economic, political and technological changes. In order to ensure relevance, lecturers have to respond to these changes and possibly spearhead further changes.

Keywords: {'name': 'Lecturers, Curriculum, Twenty-first Century, 4th Industrial Revolution, Artificial Intelligence'}

Authors & affiliations

Takalani Mashau
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.17718/tojde.43806

Agbaji, D. A., Lund, B. D., & Mannuru, N. R. (2023). Perceptions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and AI’s impact on society. Transformational Journal. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.02030

DOI: 10.1007/s10956-013-9446-8

DOI: 10.1002/sce.20027

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.015

Berenfeld, B., & Yazijian, H. (2010). Global Lab: Harnessing the cloud & social networking for K-12 science learning…since 1991. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3544–3547). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 5, 2024, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33926/

DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2018/a0271

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

DOI: 10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2

DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137989

Dintoe, S. (2018). Information and communication technology use in higher education: Perspectives from faculty. The International Journal of Education and Development, 14(2). Open Campus, The University of the West Indies, West Indies. Retrieved September 5, 2024, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184690/

DOI: 10.31681/jetol.737193

Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction, and metacognition. Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 4(1), 47–58.

DOI: 10.1007/s10734-005-0955-0

Intel. (n.d.). Preparing to teach in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/education/teaching-strategy/teaching-4th-industrial-revolution.html

Kayembe, C., & Nel, D. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(3), 79–94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.612

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-4029-8.ch005

DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2

Malik, M. (2004). Technology and security in the 21st century: A demand-side perspective. SIRPI: Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.1080/09751122.2014.11890194

ORT. (2018). What is the role for educators in the Fourth Industrial Revolution? Retrieved August 12, 2019, from https://www.ort.org/news/role-educators-fourth-industrial-revolution/

DOI: 10.31256/WP2017.1

Poole, B. J., Sky-McIlvain, B., Evans, J., Jackson, L., & Singer, Y. (2009). Education for an information age: Teaching in the computerized classroom (7th ed.).

DOI: 10.1108/03055720610667390

Sugar, W., Crawley, F., & Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers' decisions to adopt new technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 201–213. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75208/

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199667857.001.0001

Tavangarian, D. (2004). Is e learning the solution for individual learning? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 2(2), 265–272.

Toffler, A. (1990). Power shifts. Bantam Books.

Travis, D. (2016). Desk research: The what, why and how? Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.userfocus.co.uk/articles/desk-research-the-what-why-and-how.html.