The intervening role of marketing effectiveness on interactive marketing and marketing performance
Kenneth Kaunda ORCID ↗ · John Kuria Thuo · George Adegu ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 1 · 37-46
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:55 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Marketing effectiveness, a technique aimed at improving marketers' outreach to customers to optimise marketing expenditures, has consistently demonstrated efficacy in a highly competitive landscape. Nonetheless, its empirical mediating function continues to be a subject of inquiry among many experts. This study aimed to examine the mediating function of marketing effectiveness in the relationship between interactive marketing and the marketing performance of Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) in the Nyanza Region, Kenya. A cross-sectional survey study approach was employed, targeting a population of 3,211 registered MSE owners in Nyanza, from which a sample size of 356 was determined using Yamane's (1967) formula. Data were gathered by questionnaires and analysed utilising descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS version 26.0. The analysis reveals that interactive marketing significantly influences marketing performance (t = 19.933, p < 0.5); interactive marketing also significantly affects marketing effectiveness (t = 19.331, p < 0.5); furthermore, marketing effectiveness significantly impacts marketing performance (t = 15.238, p < 0.5). The indirect test indicates that marketing effectiveness, as an intervening variable, can mitigate the impact of interactive marketing on marketing performance.
Keywords: {'name': 'Marketing Effectiveness, Interactive marketing, Marketing performance.'}
Authors & affiliations
Kenneth Kaunda
Affiliation not supplied
John Kuria Thuo
Affiliation not supplied
George Adegu
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.1.107
DOI: 10.1362/026725704323080506
Aslam, T., Hamid, K., & Arshad, M. S. (2015). The effects of interactive marketing, customer satisfaction, and flashes on customer loyalty. EuroEconomica, 34(1), xx–xx.
Bagheri Kahyesh, A., & Bakhshandeh, G. (2021). Influencing the effect of export market orientation on export performance: Mediating role of marketing effectiveness and marketing capabilities (Case study: Export companies in Ahvaz). Journal of Marketing Management, 16(52), 127–141.
DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
DOI: 10.1108/02634500210450882
DOI: 10.1080/096525400346286
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Business research methods (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Deighton, J., & Sorrell, M. (1996). The future of interactive marketing. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 151–160.
Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Task, responsibilities, practices. Harper & Row.
Esmaeilpour, M., Hamidianpure, F., & Mohammadi, Z. (2020). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation on market performance of knowledge-based companies with mediating role of marketing capability and marketing effectiveness. Commercial Strategies, 16(13), 181–198.
Farris, P. W., Bendle, N., Pfeifer, P., & Reibstein, D. (2010). Marketing metrics: The definitive guide to measuring marketing performance. Pearson Education.
DOI: 10.1362/146934710X488924
DOI: 10.1108/02634500911000199
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.71.3.018
DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2017.1350251
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i4.2533
DOI: 10.1108/EBR-11-2014-0084
Kotler, P. (1977). From sales obsession to marketing effectiveness. Harvard Business Review, 55, 67–75.
Kotler, P., Keller, D., & Lane, K. (2009). Edisi ketiga belas. Jilid 1. Manajemen pemasaran.
DOI: 10.1108/JSM-08-2019-0282
DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2010.04.005
McDonald, M. (2007). Malcolm McDonald on marketing planning: Understanding marketing plans and strategy. Kogan Page Publishers.
DOI: 10.1108/08858621011058142
DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.26.2.3826
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00162-4
Norouzi, H., Abdollahpour, S., Ganjali Vand, S., & Masoomi, S. G. (2019). The effects of export market orientation on export growth with emphasis on the mediating variable marketing effectiveness (Case study: Dry goods export companies). Journal of International Business Administration, 1(3), 103–123.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.10.007
DOI: 10.1002/dir.20057
DOI: 10.1002/dir.20080
Stone, M. D., & Woodcock, N. D. (2014). Interactive, direct, and digital marketing: A future that depends on better use of business intelligence. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
DOI: 10.1108/JRIM-01-2016-0001
DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i3/679
DOI: 10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-270
DOI: 10.1080/09720502.2017.1420578
DOI: 10.1108/08876049510085973