Assessing gender disparities and variability in STEM education using subject scores

Abstract

The study claims that gender greatly affects STEM performance, with one gender continuously outperforming another, which may influence instructors' methods. One gender's performance ratings vary more than the other, suggesting STEM academic success is inconsistent. We collected data using varied methodologies. STEM enrolment and performance data were evaluated using Python statistical analysis programs with mean, median, and variability evaluations, and boxplots, pie charts, and bar charts were shown. This study found that (i) STEM qualifications have significant enrolment disparities, with Extended BSc Biochemistry and Microbiology being the most popular and Extended BSc Mathematics and Statistics being the least, and (ii) curriculum attractiveness and employment prospects strongly influence student selections. Female students excelled in Biology, Chemistry, and English, while male students excelled in IT and Mathematics. Finally, informed policy formulation and curriculum development are needed to improve STEM student engagement and achievement across genders.

Keywords: {'name': 'STEM'}, {'name': 'IT'}, {'name': 'physics'}, {'name': 'mathematics'}, {'name': 'English'}

Authors & affiliations

Vhutshilo Nekhubvi
Affiliation not supplied

Vuledzani Makhoshi
Affiliation not supplied

Vhutshilo Molaudzi
Affiliation not supplied

Thakhani Ravele
Affiliation not supplied

Ndivhuwo Ndou
Affiliation not supplied

Rendani Netshikweta
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Boon Ng, S. (2019). Exploring STEM competencies for the 21st century. UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/8216490/exploring-stem-competences-for-the-21st-century/9129420

DOI: 10.1002/tea.21778

DOI: 10.1007/s42330-023-00285-y

DOI: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_3

Fowlkes, C. (2014). Differences in students' perceived classroom experiences by instructor gender, student gender, and persistence in STEM courses (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations. (UMI No. 3689550)

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2282-6_4

DOI: 10.1177/25152459211045334

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7

Koester, B. P., Grom, G., & McKay, T. A. (2016). Patterns of gendered performance difference in introductory STEM courses. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07565

Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies.

DOI: 10.1080/0047231X.2022.12290557

DOI: 10.1002/sce.21522

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-024-00491-6

DOI: 10.1080/03050068.2011.553935

Norris, M. (2022). Why is STEM important? The impact of STEM education on society. https://www.studyusa.com/en/a/2157/why-is-stem-important-the-impact-of-stem-education-on-society

DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-11-0260

DOI: 10.1080/10632913.2021.1974997

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3543346

Riney, D. A., & Ku, H. Y. (2021). Gender differences in socio-emotional and socio-cultural perspectives of middle school students in STEM learning. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 9(1).

DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983

DOI: 10.1002/sce.21557

Whitcomb, K. M., et al. (2020). A mismatch between self-efficacy and performance: Undergraduate women in engineering tend to have lower self-efficacy despite earning higher grades than men.

Whitcomb, K. M., & Singh, C. (2020). Gender inequities throughout STEM: Women with higher grades drop STEM majors while men persist. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.00560