The effect of workplace environment and compensation on employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable; study on employees of Permuda Tirta Kanjuruhan Regency, Malang
Naves Navila ORCID ↗ · Desi Tri Kurniawati
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 3 · 114-123
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:04 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study analyzes the influence of work environment and compensation on employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable in Perumda Tirta Kanjuruhan, Malang Regency. Using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach based on Partial Least Square (PLS) on 411 respondents, the results showed that the work environment had a significant positive effect on performance and job satisfaction. Compensation had a negative effect on performance but positive on job satisfaction . Job satisfaction acts as a significant mediator between the work environment and compensation on performance. The dominant factors of the work environment included leadership fairness and communication between colleagues , while compensation was influenced by performance-based appreciation. These findings indicate that compensation injustice and mismatch of employee expectations are the causes of performance declines, even though job satisfaction is able to mediate these negative effects. Research recommends improvements to a holistic work environment (physical, psychological, social) and a transparent and performance-based compensation system to improve organizational productivity. The study contributes to the literature by clarifying the crucial role of job satisfaction as a mediator in work environment relationships, compensation, and employee performance.
Keywords: {'name': 'Workplace Environment, Compensation, Job Satisfaction, Employee Performance'}
Authors & affiliations
Naves Navila
Affiliation not supplied
Desi Tri Kurniawati
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1839
DOI: 10.3390/su15075674
Ali, A., Syed, S. G., Shaikh, F. M., & Hina Shah, M. (n.d.). Empirical analysis of relationship between job satisfaction and performance among faculty members: A case study of Sindh.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.006
Armstrong, M. (2007). A handbook of employee reward management and practice. Kogan Page.
Armstrong, M. (2010). Armstrong’s handbook of reward management practice: Improving performance through reward. Kogan Page.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101730
DOI: 10.1108/02683940710733115
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
DOI: 10.15295/bmij.v5i3.118
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.783
DOI: 10.1016/j.hitech.2024.100501
Carter, E. M. A., & Mcmahon, F. A. (n.d.). Improving employee performance through workplace coaching: A practical guide to performance management.
DOI: 10.1108/ARA-09-2017-0142
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00036
Cohen, L. (n.d.). Research methods in education (5th ed.).
Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior. Competency 2: Engage diversity and difference in practice. (n.d.).
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (SAGE Publications, Inc.).
DOI: 10.3390/admsci14040063
DOI: 10.47001/IRJIET/2023.712013
DOI: 10.35609/jmmr.2021.6.2(2)
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2022.106102
DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0086
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102789
Ei, K., Hlaing, E., Socorro, M., & Fernando, C. L. (n.d.). The role of empowerment, organizational commitment, and working environment on job performance in AAA non-profit organization. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 11(1), 168–178. Retrieved from http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/odijournal
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20357
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2018.1440958
Erlangga, H., Mulyana, Y., Sunarsi, D., Solahudin, M., Aditya Dwiwarman, D., Imam Duta Waskita, N., Rozi, A., Danang Yuangga, K., & Purwanto, A. (2021). The effect of organizational commitment and workplace environment on job satisfaction and teachers' performance. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(7).
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i9.3063
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research methods for business and management.
Gay, L., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (n.d.). Educational research.
Ghozali, I. (2008). Structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). Diponegoro University, Semarang.
Ghozali, I. (2021). Application of multivariate analysis with IBM SPSS 26 Program Edition 10.
DOI: 10.1086/643430
Greene, R. R. (n.d.). Human behavior theory & social work practice.
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.010
Haerofiatna, H., Nurjaya, N., & Rozi, A. (2021). The effect of organizational commitment and workplace environment on job satisfaction and teachers' performance. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350966691
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000378
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.03.006
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000453
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102667
DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(44)
Igalens, J., & Roussel, P. (n.d.). A study of the relationships between compensation package, work motivation, and job satisfaction.
Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. (n.d.).
DOI: 10.37934/araset.25.1.6168
DOI: 10.4108/eai.6-12-2018.2286295
Jansen, E. P. W. A. (n.d.). Research methods in education.
Joseph, O., & Mr, F. (n.d.). Workplace environment and job performance of librarians in federal university libraries in North-East Nigeria. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102513
DOI: 10.3390/joitmc4040049
DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.002
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (n.d.). Employee performance through appraisal and coaching (2nd ed.).
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101671
Latan, H., & Ramli, N. A. (n.d.). The results of partial least squares-structural equation modelling analyses (PLS-SEM): Recursive model, interaction model, intervening model, second-order model, heterogeneity model and multi-group model. Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM).
DOI: 10.1109/ICOT56925.2022.10008171
Liu, S., & Sun, K. (2021). Workplace environment and employee performance: Evidence from sell-side analysts.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.011
DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.334
Maliki, P. L., & Arsyad, A. (n.d.). The effect of workplace environment, compensation, managerial competency of the school principal, and work satisfaction on teacher performance in junior high schools in Gorontalo City. https://doi.org/10.48047/nq.2023.21.6.NQ23050
DOI: 10.15549/jeecar.v10i6.1506
DOI: 10.3390/su15118699
Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. A. (2014). Compensation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Mondy, R. W., & Martocchio, J. J. (n.d.). Human resource management (Global edition). Z-lib.org.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100970
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.11.005
DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-10-2016-0085
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.02.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1226
DOI: 10.32479/irmm.6920
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (n.d.). Organizational behavior (18th ed., Global edition).
Robinson, N. C. (n.d.). Cover illustration & design by. Sage Publications. Retrieved from www.sagepublications.com
DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-06-2020-0103
Rudman, R. (n.d.). Performance planning and review: Making employee appraisals work (2nd ed.).
DOI: 10.1002/9781118439241
Shahzad Chaudhry, M., & Shahzad, K. (n.d.). Impact of workplace environment on performance in university libraries of Lahore, Pakistan. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac
Shahzadi, I., Javed, A., Shahzaib Pirzada, S., Nasreen, S., & Khanam, F. (2014). Impact of employee motivation on employee performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(23). Retrieved from www.iiste.org
Shankar Pawar, B. (n.d.). Employee performance and well-being: Leadership, justice, support, and workplace spirituality.
Storey, J., Wright, P. M., & Ulrich, D. (n.d.). The Routledge companion to strategic human resource management.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29821
The impact of working environment. (n.d.).
Total reward system, job satisfaction, and employee productivity on company financial performance: Evidence from Indonesian Generation Z workers. (n.d.).
DOI: 10.1111/jabr.12169
DOI: 10.32479/irmm.7447
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114465
Vernooij, C., Stuijt, J., Hendriks, M., ten Have, W., & ten Have, S. (n.d.). Organizational behaviour and change management: The impact of cognitive and social bias.
Wahid, A., Sasono, A. D., Setianto, F., Suyono, J., Ratnasahara, D., Sekolah, E., Ilmu, T., Mahardika, E., & Surabaya, I. (n.d.). The determinant factors of job satisfaction and employee performance: Direct compensation and workplace environment.
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100749
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113709
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.106990
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.006