The challenges and opportunities in implementing universal health coverage: a comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand

Abstract

Universal Health Coverage (UHC) aims to ensure access to quality healthcare services without financial hardship. This study compares the UHC models in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand to identify their strengths, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. Using a comparative literature analysis, the research highlights significant differences in funding mechanisms, population coverage, service efficiency, and policy implementation. Malaysia successfully leverages its high per capita income to provide universal healthcare through tax-funded services, while Thailand demonstrates efficient resource management with the "30 Baht" scheme, ensuring universal access despite its moderate-income level. Although Indonesia faces challenges due to its large population and low per capita income, it has made significant progress, covering 86% of its population since the launch of the National Health Insurance (JKN) program in 2014. Based on the findings, policy recommendations include enhancing financing mechanisms, improving service efficiency, and ensuring broader access to healthcare services in all regions. For Malaysia and Thailand, further exploring sustainable financing models and addressing disparities in healthcare quality can help ensure long-term UHC sustainability. For Indonesia, increasing compliance with premium payments, improving healthcare infrastructure, and addressing funding deficits are key to achieving more inclusive healthcare access. These recommendations offer valuable insights for improving UHC implementation strategies in diverse economic and demographic contexts.

Keywords: {'name': 'Universal Health Coverage, BPJS Kesehatan, National Health Insurance, Malaysia, Thailand'}

Authors & affiliations

Luthfi Dwi Risyanda
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

World Bank, 2008, ‘Public Sector Reform, ‘What works and why; An IEG evaluation of world bank support’, World Bank Infoshop, ISBN-13; 978-0-8213-7589-1.

DOI: 10.21109/kesmas.v16i4.5440

DOI: 10.47363/JPRSR/2022(3)127

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084500

DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015179

DOI: 10.35877/454RI.daengku1039

DOI: 10.1177/21501327211023707

DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.10877

DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003663

DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.01204

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288269

DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080166

Kowal, P., Hoang, T., Ng, N., & Bank, D. (2024). Universal health coverage and ageing in developing Asia.

Kuhonta, E. M. (2020). The politics and meaning of universal health care in Thailand (p. 248). Palgrave Macmillan.

DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00572-5

DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01159-3

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000799

Mor, N. (2021). Policy lessons from Thailand’s “30-Baht” health reforms. ResearchGate, March. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350108401_Policy_Lessons_from_Thailand%27s_30-Baht_Health_Reforms

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276480

DOI: 10.22216/jen.v7i2.1363

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050565

DOI: 10.20473/jphrecode.v8i1.41664

DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1611

DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v13n6p24

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264422

DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010755

DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100261

DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009281

DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01578-0

DOI: 10.1017/ics.2022.6