Responsible leadership influence on readiness towards change in a South African state-owned enterprise

Abstract

This study investigated responsible leadership influence on readiness for change in a South African state-owned enterprise. A quantitative research approach was used to conduct a cross-sectional study with a stratified random sample of employees in a South African state-owned enterprise. Participants completed the Responsible Leadership Scale (RLS) and the Readiness for Change Scale (RTCS). Standardised multiple regression analysis was used to analyse the influence of responsible leadership on readiness for change. The results showed that responsible leadership relates positively and significantly to readiness for change. Furthermore, responsible leadership influences willingness to change. This study emphasises the important role of responsible leadership in readiness for change. In addition, understanding the influence of responsible leadership on readiness for change can provide insight into the inner motives that drive teachers in difficult situations. The study can serve as a basis to increase staff readiness for change.

Keywords: {'name': 'Responsible leadership'}, {'name': 'Readiness towards change'}, {'name': 'Social exchange theory'}, {'name': 'South African state-owned enterprise'}

Authors & affiliations

Jeremy Mitonga-Monga
Affiliation not supplied

Dakalo Precious Monyai
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-07-2012-0111

Al-Tahitah, A., Muthaliff, M. M. A., Abdulrab, M., & Al-Maamari, Q. A. (2018). Paper review on the relationship between transformational leadership and readiness for change. International Journal of Energy Policy and Management, 3(1), 1–7.

Asbari, M., Hidayat, D. D., & Purwanto, A. (2021). Managing employee performance: From leadership to readiness for change. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v2i1.12

DOI: 10.1177/014920639902500303

DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2023.100057

DOI: 10.1177/0149206313484513

DOI: 10.4324/9780203792643

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-06031-2_16

DOI: 10.4324/9780203807644

DOI: 10.21818/001c.14568

DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.147.6.607-630

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2014.0013

DOI: 10.1186/s43093-022-00148-2

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21789-5

DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.20035

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

DOI: 10.1504/IJBGE.2021.116510

DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-12-2017-0397

DOI: 10.1177/0021886306295295

DOI: 10.1002/joe.22177

DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-04-2020-0165

DOI: 10.1177/001872674700100103

DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-02-2019-0088

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory and learning. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science (pp. 60–86). New York: Harper & Row.

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z

DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.1134

Marnoto, K. Y., & Desiana, P. M. (2024). The influence of perceived organisational support and transformational leadership on readiness for change: The mediation role of organisational trust. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(3), 5291–5318. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i3.5129

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02493

DOI: 10.1111/joms.12195

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2999-0

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2999-0

DOI: 10.4102/ac.v23i1.1046

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02493

DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12436

DOI: 10.2478/v10305-012-0016-y

DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v20i0.2013

DOI: 10.1177/0021886320920366

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9518-x

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1114-4

DOI: 10.9744/ijbs.4.1.33-43

DOI: 10.1177/0149206312457417

DOI: 10.46799/jss.v3i2.311

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2014.0016

DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.07.001

DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2013.056477

Stafford, L., & Kuiper, K. (2015). Social exchange theories: Calculating the rewards and costs of personal relationships. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal relations (3rd ed., pp. 379–390). Routledge.

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2014.0081

Schüz, M. (2016). Sustainably responsible leadership and innovation. In Lukeš, M., Srpová, J., Špa?ek, M., Pilková, A., & Ostapenko, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference: Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Corporate Sustainability (pp. 634–656). Prague: Oeconomica.

DOI: 10.12816/0018079

DOI: 10.1007/s10869-005-4518-2

Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48.

DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-05-2012-0064

DOI: 10.1353/eas.2021.0002

DOI: 10.3390/su11040944

DOI: 10.1108/K-03-2022-0447

DOI: 10.1108/09578230210433436