Where are the women? analysing women in leadership positions at institutions of higher learning in South Africa
Andile Sokani ORCID ↗ · Hlengiwe Zulu ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 3 · 73-77
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This research examines the ongoing under-representation of women in leadership positions within South African higher education institutions (HEIs). Despite a considerable increase in the number of women entering academia, their advancement to top leadership roles remained markedly constrained. This study analysed secondary data from forty scholarly articles published between 2010 and 2023 to investigate the intricate impediments obstructing women's advancement, the wider consequences of these challenges, and viable measures for enhancing gender parity in academic leadership. The results indicated that deep-rooted systemic and cultural obstacles, along with an absence of supportive legislation, sustained gender disparities within institutional hierarchies. Proposals for modification encompassed the establishment of explicit trajectories for women's professional advancement, gender-sensitive leadership training initiatives, mentorship programs to assist aspiring female leaders, and revisions to institutional regulations to foster diversity. The study emphasised the necessity for ongoing evaluation of gender equality policies and enhanced accountability mechanisms to guarantee continued advancement towards equitable representation in leadership.
Keywords: {'name': 'women in leadership'}, {'name': 'Higher education'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'gender disparity'}, {'name': 'systemic barrier'}
Authors & affiliations
Andile Sokani
Affiliation not supplied
Hlengiwe Zulu
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1108/17542411011048164
DOI: 10.1177/1470595810384588
DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1704
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05527-0
DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1981199
DOI: 10.4471/generos.2015.49
DOI: 10.18820/2519593X/pie.v38.i2.04
DOI: 10.1177/0892020620981951
DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0533
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2012.00523.x