Assessing poverty dynamics in social grant dependent household: a comprehensive analysis

Abstract

Poverty persists in many countries especially those in the sub-Saharan African region where the levels have been getting worse. The extent of poverty has been worsened in the last 5 years by the many exogenous factors that have gone beyond the control of individual countries. From Covid-19 in late 2019 to early 2020 going all the way to 2021, to Ukraine Russia war that disrupted global supply chains, to the war between Israel and Hamas that have left countries divided. Several countries have also witnessed natural disasters like cyclones and heavy rains and tidal waves that have caused irreparable damage to livelihoods.  In the wake of these external factors over and above country specific a number of governments introduced social grants as safety nets to help households in danger of abject poverty. This study assesses the dynamics of poverty within social grant-dependent households in South Africa, exploring the extent to which social grants mitigate poverty across varying levels of deprivation. Using 2023 data from a representative national survey, the analysis applies conditional probability models to examine the influence of social grants on household poverty risk, considering three distinct poverty thresholds: the Food Poverty Line, the Lower Bound Poverty Line, and the Upper Bound Poverty Line. Findings reveal that households receiving grants experience a statistically significant reduction in poverty risk, particularly at the lower poverty levels, underscoring the effectiveness of grants as a targeted poverty alleviation tool. However, unemployment, single-headed households, and racial disparities are found to compound poverty risk, pointing to the need for an integrated approach that combines social grants with employment and empowerment programs. Female-headed households are especially vulnerable, showing a higher likelihood of poverty across all poverty lines, likely due to factors such as lower income and greater caregiving responsibilities. The study concludes that while social grants play a critical role in reducing poverty risk, additional measures are essential for addressing the underlying socioeconomic disparities that affect poverty dynamics. Recommendations include increasing grant values to match inflation, expanding job creation efforts, and implementing targeted support programs for the most vulnerable demographics, particularly single-parent and female-headed households. These measures would enhance the efficacy of social grants and support long-term poverty reduction efforts in South Africa.  

Keywords: {'name': 'Poverty'}, {'name': 'social grant'}, {'name': 'household'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'General Household'}

Authors & affiliations

Hannah Dunga
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1080/10875549.2019.1678551

Barrientos, A. (2018). Social protection for the poor and poorest: Concepts, policies and politics. Palgrave Macmillan.

DOI: 10.1080/15575330709490182

Bhorat, H., & Kanbur, R. (2006). Poverty and policy in post-apartheid South Africa. HSRC Press.

Bhorat, H., Oosthuizen, M., & van der Westhuizen, C. (2017). Poverty, inequality and the nature of economic growth in South Africa. Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town.

Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2016). Transformative social protection. Institute of Development Studies Working Paper.

DSD, S., & UNICEF. (2012). The South African Child Support Grant Impact Assessment: Evidence from a survey of children, adolescents and their households. http://www.unicef.org/southafrica; http://www.dsd.gov.za; http://www.sassa.gov.za

Department of Social Development (DSD), South African Social Security Agency (SASSA), & UNICEF. (2012). The South African Child Support Grant Impact Assessment: Evidence from a survey of children, adolescents, and their households. Pretoria: UNICEF South Africa.

DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7581-5

Handa, S., Park, M., Darko, R. O., & Osei-Akoto, I. (2018). The impact of social grants on economic productivity: Evidence from Malawi. Journal of Development Studies, 54(10), 1827–1843.

Hall, K. (2024). Child support grants. Statistics on Children in South Africa. http://childrencount.uct.ac.za/indicator.php?domain=2&indicator=10#:~:text=Although%20birth%20registration%20rates%20recovered,and%20to%20468%2C645%20in%202024

Hughes, B. B., Hanna, T., McNeil, K., Bohl, D. K., & Moyer, J. D. (2021). Pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals in a world reshaped by COVID-19. Denver: University of Denver.

Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2021). Handbook on poverty and inequality. World Bank Publications.

Hickey, S., & King, S. (2019). Understanding social protection in Africa: The politics of provisioning in uncertain times. Journal of Social Policy, 48(4), 665–684.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). World Social Protection Report 2021–22: Social protection at the crossroads – In pursuit of a better future. Geneva: ILO.

DOI: 10.5089/9798400219351.001

IMF. (2022). Fiscal policies for inclusive growth and reducing inequality.

Kabeer, N. (2015). Social protection in South Asia: A review of experiences and issues. Routledge.

Lewis, O. (1968). A study of slum culture: Backgrounds for La Vida.

Makgetla, N. (2020). Inequality in South Africa: An overview. TIPS Working Paper No. September, 1–54. www.tips.org.za

Masocha, M., & Chitiga-Mabugu, M. (2018). The effect of social grants on poverty reduction in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 35(6), 794–814.

DOI: 10.1080/10875549.2021.1910100

National Planning Commission. (2012). National Development Plan 2030: Our future – Make it work. The Presidency, Republic of South Africa.

Patel, L., Dikoko, V., & Archer, J. (2023). Social grants, livelihoods and poverty responses of social grant beneficiaries in South Africa (Issue February).

DOI: 10.1177/0020872812444481

Patel, L., Khan, Z., & Samuels, R. (2023). Social grants in South Africa: History, impact, and implications. University of Johannesburg Press.

Ravallion, M. (2020). Pandemic policies in poor places. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 27232.

Samson, M. (2009). Social cash transfers and pro-poor growth. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

DOI: 10.1057/9781137452696

Seekings, J. (2007). Poverty and inequality after apartheid. CSSR Working Paper No. 200, Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.

Standing, G. (2017). Basic income: And how we can make it happen. Penguin.

Statistics South Africa. (2018). Overcoming poverty and inequality in South Africa.

Statistics South Africa. (2018). Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2015.

STATSSA. (2022a). Census 2022 Statistical Release. https://census.statssa.gov.za/assets/documents/2022/P03014_Census_2022_Statistical_Release.pdf

STATSSA. (2022b). South Africa mid-year population estimates 2022 (Issue July). https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022022.pdf

South Africa Government. (2024). Foster child grant. https://www.gov.za/services/child-care-social-benefits/foster-child-grant

Sulla, V., & Zikhali, P. (2018). Overcoming poverty and inequality in South Africa: An assessment of drivers, constraints and opportunities. In Overcoming poverty and inequality in South Africa. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/530481521735906534

United Nations. (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals Report: 2018. https://doi.org/10.11260/kenkokyoiku.19.77

United Nations. (2024). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024.

UNESCO. (2022). Education and the SDGs: Responding to global challenges.

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64091-6

DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv14npk3p.9

World Bank. (2024). Poverty. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview

Woolard, I., & Leibbrandt, M. (2013). The evolution and impact of unconditional cash transfers in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 30(1), 75–90.