Augmented theory of planned behaviour, tax literacy and tax compliance in developing countries: a conceptual framework

Abstract

Effective tax systems rely on tax literacy and tax compliance behaviour among taxpayers for government revenue mobilisation. However, the extant literature suggests that in sub-Saharan Africa, mobilising tax revenue to fund public services and infrastructure development to achieve the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals (SDGs) remains a great challenge. According to the 2024 Revenue Statistics in Africa report, jointly undertaken by the African Union Commission (AUC), African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF), the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration and the OECD Development Centre, the average tax-to-GDP ratio was 16% in African countries in 2022, compared to 19.3%, 21.5% and 34.0% respectively for  Asia and the Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, and OECD countries. Despite being recognised as a critical aspect of tax compliance, the role played by political legitimacy in taxpayer compliance behaviour remained under-explored in developing countries. This study proposes an Augmented Theory of Planned Compliance Behaviour (ATPCB) framework, based on Ajzen’s (1991) theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and both the deterrence and accommodation theories of compliance, to predict taxpayers’ compliance behaviour, especially in developing countries. The framework comprises four components: attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and political legitimacy. The findings of this study have implications for policymakers and researchers as it will assist future research in providing a structured approach for assessing taxpayers’ compliance behaviour. Also, it will provide interested parties with a better understanding of the combined effects of individuals’ beliefs, attitudes, norms, and political legitimacy on tax compliance. Lastly, the study will assist governments in deciding the future course of action towards effective policymaking for taxation and revenue mobilisation.

Keywords: {'name': 'Legitimacy, Tax, Education; Tax compliance; Tax literacy.'}

Authors & affiliations

Emmanuel Oseifuah
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Abdul, F., & Wang’ombe, D. (2018). Income tax compliance behaviour in Kenya: An application of structural equation modelling. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(6), 59. https://www.iiste.org

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.195

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.006

Alexander, P., Balavac, M., Mukherjee, S., Lymer, A., & Massey, D. (2018). Improving tax literacy and tax morale of young adults. BAFES – Bournemouth Accounting, Finance & Economic Series, No. 23.

DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

DOI: 10.1057/s41294-016-0017-x

DOI: 10.1080/00958964.1975.9942002

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001

DOI: 10.3390/economies10020030

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198274957.001.0001

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-014-0224-9

DOI: 10.2478/aicue-2014-0004

DOI: 10.3386/w6575

DOI: 10.1521/jata.2007.29.1.93

DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-09-2018-0379

DOI: 10.4102/jef.v13i1.461

DOI: 10.9790/487X-1066771

DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2018.1526867

DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.09.003

DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-04-2020-0847

Dianda, I., Ouedraogo, I., & Ouedraogo, A. (2021). Towards resilient recovery and sustainable development with a renewed financing model: Political legitimacy and tax revenue mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Economic Conference 2021, Cabo Verde, 2–4 December 2021.

DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1755-7

DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1488(04)07001-2

Farrar, J., Rennie, M., & Thorne, L. (2022). Fairness, legitimacy, and tax compliance. eJournal of Tax Research, 19(2), 186–212.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-6435.00093

DOI: 10.1038/nature01474

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2411424

DOI: 10.5089/9781475558173.001

DOI: 10.3390/socsci13010003

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004

DOI: 10.1017/S0814062600002196

DOI: 10.2307/257990

HMRC. (2018). Measuring tax gaps, 2018 edition. Methodological annexe. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/715744/HMRC-measuring-tax-gaps-2018-methodological-annex.pdf

DOI: 10.1016/S0313-5926(08)50010-5

Internal Revenue Service. (2022). Federal tax compliance research: Tax gap estimates for tax years 2014–2016 (Publication 1415, Rev. 08-2022). Washington, DC.

DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azs032

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-5297-8_4

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.007

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002

Knabe, A. (2012). Applying Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour to a study of online course adoption in public relations education (Doctoral dissertation). https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/186

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010

DOI: 10.4135/9781452243610

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.007

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2365751

DOI: 10.1177/0002764209338797

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

Lu, C., Huang, S., & Lo, P. (2010). An empirical study of the online tax filing acceptance model: Integrating TAM and TPB. African Journal of Business Management, 4(5), 800–810.

DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v7n9p207

Mascagni, G., & Santoro, F. (2018). What is the role of taxpayer education in Africa? Institute of Development Studies Report. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/13704

McBarnet, D. (2003). When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 229–244). Aldershot: Ashgate.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1415164

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02903-y

Mintah, R. (2020). Examining the determinants of tax compliance intention among the self-employed in Ghana (Unpublished MPhil dissertation). University of Ghana, Legon.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3120566

Murphy, K. (2007). Procedural justice and the regulation of tax compliance behaviour: The moderating role of personal norms. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series at AYSPS, GSU Paper 0731. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ays/ispwps/paper0731.html

DOI: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca

DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2316886

DOI: 10.1787/f3d8ea10-en

DOI: 10.1787/78e9af3a-en

DOI: 10.1787/9789264205154-en

DOI: 10.1787/2ee29f6b-en

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1946006

Plumley, A. H. (2022). The net tax gap for tax years 2014–2016: Research, applied analytics & statistics technical paper (Publication 5786). Internal Revenue Service. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5786.pdf

DOI: 10.1177/1043463118759671

DOI: 10.9783/9781512806274

Santoso, D. (2023). Tax compliance in Indonesia: A legitimacy perspective. The Scientia Law and Economics Review, 2(2), 99–105.

Smulders, S., Stiglingh, M., Franzsen, R., & Fouché, L. (2012). Tax compliance costs for the small business sector in South Africa: Establishing a baseline. eJournal of Tax Research, 10, 184–226.

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198866428.003.0010

Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038

Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., & Mestelman, S. (2005). Attitudes, incentives, and tax compliance. Canadian Tax Journal, 52, 29–61.

Williams, R. (2001). Prosecuting non-lodgers: To persuade or punish? Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 12. Canberra: Australian National University.

DOI: 10.1086/NTJ41791992

Worthington, A. K. (2021). Persuasion theory in action: An open educational resource. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

DOI: 10.1002/jid.3349