Reforming basic education in South Africa: Socio-Political implications of the BELA Bill
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 4 · 440-448
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:00 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Education remains a cornerstone of sustainable development and social equity, particularly in post-apartheid South Africa, where historical disparities in access and quality persist. The Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill introduces wide-ranging reforms, including the compulsory introduction of Grade R, regulation of school admissions and language policies, formalisation of homeschooling, and a complete prohibition of corporal punishment. These reforms aim to enhance fairness and inclusivity but raise critical questions regarding constitutional rights, cultural diversity, and the socio-political feasibility of implementation. This article critically analyses the BELA Bill within an international context, drawing on comparative insights from multilingual and education-forward countries such as Canada, Finland, Norway, and New Zealand. Through a qualitative review of policy documents, academic literature, and case studies, the study identifies opportunities and challenges in implementing the bill’s provisions. The analysis highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement, capacity building, and robust monitoring frameworks to ensure successful reform. Aligning with global trends in education transformation, the BELA Bill presents an opportunity to redefine South Africa’s education system as more inclusive, equitable, and responsive to societal needs. However, the realisation of these goals will depend on pragmatic, context-sensitive implementation that accounts for South Africa’s diverse linguistic and cultural landscape.
Keywords: {'name': 'Education reform'}, {'name': 'inclusivity'}, {'name': 'multilingual education'}, {'name': 'early childhood education'}, {'name': 'homeschooling regulation'}, {'name': 'educational equity'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'policy implementation'}
Authors & affiliations
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. (1996). Act 108 of 1996. Government of South Africa.
Department of Basic Education. (2018). Policy on home education (Government Gazette No. 42037). Government of South Africa. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202005/Home%20Education%20Policy%20.pdf
Department of Basic Education. (2023). Annual report 2022/23. Government of South Africa. https://nationalgovernment.co.za/department_annual/457/2023-department-of-basic-education-(dbe)-annual-report.pdf
DOI: 10.54676/JJNK6989
Government of South Africa. (2024). Basic Education Laws Amendment Act, 2024 (Act No. 32 of 2024; Government Gazette No. 51258). Government of South Africa. https://www.parliament.gov.za/storage/app/media/Acts/2024/Act_32_of_2024_Basic_Education_Laws_Amendment_Act.pdf
DOI: 10.35489/BSG-RISE-2022/PE03
Heckman, J. (2011). The economics of inequality: The value of early childhood education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–47.
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2013.09.002
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED615317
DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1519
DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v15i1.1598
Spaull, N. (2019). Priorities for education reform in South Africa: Input document for Treasury’s Economic Colloquium. Stellenbosch University. https://nicspaull.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/v2-spaull-priorities-for-educ-reform-treasury-19-jan-2019.pdf