Employees’ perceptions of the employment relationships, work engagement and performance management system in the selected South African National departments

Abstract

This study examines employees' perceptions regarding employment relationships, work engagement (WE), and performance management systems (PMS) within specific South African National Departments. This subject has not been thoroughly investigated in prior research within a comparable context. Despite extensive research on PMS, employment relationships, and WE, there remains a notable gap in comprehending employees' perceptions of these elements within the chosen South African National departments. This research aims to address the existing gap and provide a thorough understanding of these important aspects. This research is of significant importance and urgency. The research employed quantitative and cross-sectional designs. This study included 400 administrative employees, who were purposively selected from a population of 10,660. The research focused on employees at job levels 1 to 12, specifically those who were permanently employed and possessed a minimum of five years of experience within the department. A structured questionnaire was utilised as the primary instrument for data collection, comprising closed-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were conducted using SPSS to evaluate the reliability of the measurement instrument. The study results revealed mixed perceptions among respondents; nonetheless, there is a predominantly positive view regarding compliance, fairness, good faith, and truth within the selected government departments. The study indicated that respondents exhibited a notably positive perception of vigour, dedication, and absorption in their work. A moderate positive perception was noted regarding the understanding of PMS, PMS alignment, and the focus on performance management. This study presents practical implications, emphasising the importance for managers to prioritise employee attitudes towards the performance management system (PMS), alignment of performance management, organisational culture, and the employee performance review process, rather than solely comprehending the PMS process itself.

Keywords: {'name': 'PMS'}, {'name': 'work engagement'}, {'name': 'employment relationship;'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'employees'}

Authors & affiliations

Godfrey Maake
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1504/IJPMB.2021.112253

DOI: 10.62025/dwijmh.v2i1.19

DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01992-1

DOI: 10.1177/1938965520943094

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.2.003

DOI: 10.36348/sjbms.2023.v08i02.002

Ansah, R. H., Osei, J., Sorooshian, S., & Aikhuele, D. O. (2018). Importance of employer-employee relationship towards the growth of a business. Calitatea, 19(166), 42–49.

Anyim, W. O. (2020). Performance management approaches for effective service delivery in Federal University Libraries in South East, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 4169.

DOI: 10.35912/amor.v1i1.199

DOI: 10.1177/2158244020969383

Bhole, S., Bhavsar, N., & Shah, B. (2023). Impact of performance management system on employee performance- A conceptual framework for IT organizations. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 11(2), 57–62.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1081

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041903

DOI: 10.13054/mije.13.35.3.2

Clayton, C. H., & Matsiliza, N. S. (2015). Management of employee performance in the South African Public Service: The case of the National Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in the Western Cape. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(3-1), 125–131.

DOI: 10.1177/0149206305279602

DOI: 10.1108/17410400410533890

DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03371-w

DOI: 10.35719/jiep.v1i2.24

Ehlers, L. I. (2016). Measuring primary employment relationship satisfaction in South African supervisory relationships. Journal of Contemporary Management, 13, 745–766.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15442

DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1215

DOI: 10.4135/9781483351377.n11

DOI: 10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.62.2003

DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887

DOI: 10.1177/0149206315575554

DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100707

DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S346697

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02928

DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1396549

DOI: 10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.04

DOI: 10.22259/2642-8318.0501003

Mlambo, V.H., Ndlovu, G., Thusi, X., Mathonsi, V., & Mkhize, N.E. (2022). Professionalizing the public sector in South Africa: Challenges, opportunities, and prospects. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(12), 328–340.

Mokoele, N.J., Masenya, M.J., & Makalela, K.I. (2018). Performance management as a mechanism to effective public service delivery in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 106-118.

DOI: 10.25159/1998-8125/6398

Mufeed, S.A., & Showkat, S. (2017). Employee’s perception towards performance management system in banking sector: An empirical study. International Research Journal of Human Resources and Social Sciences, 4(12), 76-96.

Muhammad, S., Khan, I., & Hameed, F. (2021). The impact of performance management system on employees performance. International Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(3), 38–47.

Mulili, B. (2018). Influence of employee relations on organizational performance: The case of Nyamasheke District, Rwanda. Journal of Human Resource & Leadership, 2(3), 61–86.

Navickas, V., Kovacova, P., Grencikova, A., & Spankova, J. (2023). Work engagement and human capital: The role of the manager in employee work engagement. Transformations in Business & Economics, 22(1), 51-64.

DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v10i1.595

Nebolisa, K.N., Egobueze, A., & Nwaoburu, L. (2021). An appraisal of employee relations and organizational performance in Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government of Rivers State, 2010-2021. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(8), 34-39.

Nikoli?, T.M., Peri?, N., & Bovan, A. (2020). The role of feedback as a management tool in performance management program. Calitatea, 21(177), 3-8.

DOI: 10.1177/1461444820921938

DOI: 10.47814/ijssrr.v6i6.1374

DOI: 10.29040/ijebar.v4i02.998

Pandian, V.N., & Saranraj, M. (2021). Employer and employee relationship. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 2(6), 380-389.

Parliamentary Monitoring Group. (2024). Performance Management & Development System for HODs (with Ministries); Committee Legacy Report. Retrieved from: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/38629/ [Accessed 29 May 2024].

DOI: 10.1504/JGBA.2021.114318

DOI: 10.1080/23311908.2022.2080322

Raosoft® INC. (2004). Raosoft® sample size calculator. [Online]. Available from: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html [Accessed: 27/11/2017].

Rogito, J., & Makabe, M. (2023). The art and act of providing feedback at the workplace: Effective feedback for positive results. Pan-African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 49-56.

DOI: 10.46827/ejmms.v5i3.869

DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1804967

Samarasinghe, P.H. (2017). Study on the effective factors on the employer-employee relationship for the motivation of associate-level employees at ABC hotel, Colombo. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(11), 59-68.

DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v8i3.13415

Sathiya, N. (2018). The impact of employee and employer relationship in the organisations. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(10), 77–79.

DOI: 10.1002/job.248

DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282471

DOI: 10.25159/2664-3731/9669

Shammine, G.L., & Raj, M.R. (2022). A study on employer-employee relationship with special reference to Shree Devi Textile, Coimbatore. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 6(2), 1265–1269.

Silitonga, K.A.A., Ahmad, F., Simanjuntak, C.W., & Atrizka, D. (2020). Exploring the nexus between HR practices and work engagement: The mediating role of Job Demand. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 342-351.

DOI: 10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.03

DOI: 10.35808/ijeba/588

DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1557

DOI: 10.2307/256928

DOI: 10.7748/ns.29.31.44.e8681

DOI: 10.1177/0022185617748990

DOI: 10.1177/1534484320917560

DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.09.002

DOI: 10.7862/rz.2022.hss.31

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245078