Role of dynamic capabilities in public sector performance: a strategic management perspective

Abstract

This research investigates how dynamic capabilities contribute to improving public sector performance and the degree to which strategic management facilitates their implementation. This research employs Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) to assess the impact of sensing (identifying and interpreting opportunities and threats), seizing (mobilising resources to capitalise on opportunities), and transformation (realigning structures, processes, and assets to adapt to change) on organisational performance. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational research design was utilised, employing structured surveys from 193 respondents in key public energy sector enterprises in Malawi. The findings indicate that sensing and transformation capabilities substantially improve performance, while seizing capability alone does not exert a direct influence unless combined with other strategic processes. The interplay between sensing and seizing underscores the necessity for public enterprises to both identify opportunities and implement effective actions in response. Organisational capability has emerged as a vital factor, highlighting the significance of workforce competence and institutional adaptability in enhancing performance. This study advances the theory of DCT by illustrating its relevance in public sector governance constraints and presents a quantitative framework for evaluating dynamic capabilities. Policy recommendations involve enhancing seizing capability by overcoming internal bureaucratic obstacles, promoting an adaptive organisational culture, advancing leadership development, and incorporating data-driven decision-making. These measures aim to empower public enterprises to effectively manage complexity, increase responsiveness, and attain

Keywords: {'name': 'Dynamic capabilities'}, {'name': 'public sector performance'}, {'name': 'strategic management'}, {'name': 'energy sector'}, {'name': 'organizational adaptability'}

Authors & affiliations

Pachalo Mgola Mwanza
Affiliation not supplied

Javaid Ahmad Dar
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447

DOI: 10.5296/bms.v9i1.13112

DOI: 10.3390/admsci7010004

DOI: 10.1177/073491491904300303

Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217-225. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2505953

DOI: 10.12816/0040336

DOI: 10.3390/admsci14020037

DOI: 10.4135/9781526430212

DOI: 10.1108/ARLA-02-2023-0031

DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v9i1.540

Chnigri, Y., Sadik, M., & Slimani, H. (2024). New research perspectives on dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Alternatives Managériales Economiques, 6(4), 354-372. https://doi.org/10.48374/IMIST.PRSM/ame-v6i4.45698

DOI: 10.1007/s43546-022-00392-2

Eichhorn, B. R. (2014). Common method variance techniques. Cleveland, OH: SAS Institute Inc. Available at: https://www.lexjansen.com/mwsug/2014/AA/MWSUG-2014-AA11.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2024].

DOI: 10.4236/jfrm.2017.63020

DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2018-0342

DOI: 10.1002/ijop.13243

DOI: 10.25069/spmj.290425

Hawrysz, L. (2018). The concept of dynamic capabilities as the answer to the changing expectations towards public sector organisations. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarz?dzanie/Politechnika ?l?ska. http://bazekon.icm.edu.pl/bazekon/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171546273

DOI: 10.22151/politikon.24.4

Khan, R., & Huda, F. (2016). The impact of strategic management on the performance of health care organizations: A study of three selected tertiary health care centers of Karachi, Pakistan. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(5), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.4172/2223-5833.1000253

DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

DOI: 10.1504/IJBEX.2016.074850

DOI: 10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679

DOI: 10.61426/sjbcm.v8i3.2052

DOI: 10.2991/icbmr-17.2017.28

DOI: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576360405

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012015

DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12244

Reuning, K., & Plutzer, E. (2020). Valid vs. invalid straightlining: The complex relationship between straightlining and data quality. Survey Research Methods, 14(5), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i5.7641

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2018.9.003

DOI: 10.47743/jopafl-2023-27-32

DOI: 10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Singh, A. S. (2017). Common procedures for development, validity, and reliability of a questionnaire. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 790-801. https://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/5549.pdf

DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100199

DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208

Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J., Gamble, J., & Thompson, A. A. (2005). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage: Concepts and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Tranmer, M., & Elliot, M. (2008). Multiple linear regression. The Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research (CCSR), 5(5), 1-5. https://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cmist/archive-publications/working-papers/2008/2008-19-multiple-linear-regression.pdf

DOI: 10.4324/9781315723112

Walle, A. H. (2015). Qualitative research in business: A practical overview. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-4438-6621-7

DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206

Zikmund, W. G., D'Alessandro, S., Winzar, H., Lowe, B., & Babin, B. (2014). Marketing research. Sydney: Cengage Learning. https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/marketing-research