The intertemporal relationship between downside risks and expected stock returns: Evidence from time-varying transition probability models

Abstract

The increasing inter relationship between financial markets have led to the discovery of new risk dynamics particularly when considering downside risk. Recent advances in econometric modelling have prompted the search for new insights into the intertemporal dynamics between downside risks and expected stock returns. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate this relationship in the S&P 500, the FTSE 100, the DAX, the Nikkei 225, and the TSX Composite, covering the period from January 2000 to December 2023. Using a time-varying transition probability model, the findings revealed consistent negative correlations between downside risk measures and expected returns across all markets, with CVaR exhibiting stronger inverse relationships compared to VaR. These findings challenge the classical risk-return trade-off but align with behavioural explanations where heightened risk aversion during downturns suppresses returns. The regime-switching analysis further uncovers asymmetry in transition probabilities where high-risk regimes persist with a 74% probability, while low-risk regimes show greater stability. By implication, this study provides empirical support for regulatory frameworks prioritizing tail risk mitigation, particularly in volatile markets.

Keywords: {'name': 'Downside Risk; Expected Return; Scaling Behaviour; Time-Varying Transition Probability Models; Value-at-Risk; Conditional Value-at-Risk'}

Authors & affiliations

Samuel Tabot Enow
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1177/21582440221097394

DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhj035

Bae, K.-H., Kim, D., & Lee, Y. (2014). Downside risk and stock returns: Evidence from international markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(2), 255–275.

Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2009). Does idiosyncratic risk matter? The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 973-1008.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90017-4

BCBS. (2019). Minimum capital requirements for market risk. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.05.008

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4068

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.017

DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.13752

DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.13996

DOI: 10.1057/s41283-022-00110-0

DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2006.12.004

DOI: 10.2307/1912559

DOI: 10.2307/1914185

DOI: 10.1002/jae.2511

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.07.001

DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2023.101981

Maheu, J. M., McCurdy, T. H., & Song, Y. (2012). Components of bull and bear markets: Volatility, jumps, and information flow. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 10(1), 1-41.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x

DOI: 10.2307/1913811

Post, T., & van Vliet, P. (2006). Downside risk and asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 63-91.

DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00271-6

DOI: 10.2307/1907413

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102089