The influence of formal central-local government interface on implementing good agricultural practices
Sarah Killagane ORCID ↗ · David Mhando · Pius Nyamhanga · Christopher Mahonge ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 4 · 301-314
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The implementation of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) in developing countries, particularly Tanzania, requires strong government intervention to achieve sustainable agricultural outcomes in line with both national and international standards. Given the high costs and institutional demands associated with GAP implementation, the central–local government interface plays a critical role in facilitating, coordinating, and overseeing this process. This formal interface comprises key dimensions, including the transfer of authority, interaction channels, adherence to existing legislation, and resource-sharing mechanisms. However, limited understanding of how these institutional arrangements influence the effective implementation of GAPs has contributed to persistent inconsistencies and inefficiencies. This study investigated the extent to which Tanzania’s formal central–local government interactions affect GAP implementation. A total of 228 respondents were surveyed across Local Government Authorities in the Morogoro, Mbeya, and Shinyanga regions, and data were analysed using multiple linear regression. The results demonstrate that the transfer of authority (? = 0.124, p < 0.05), interaction channels (? = 0.540, p < 0.001), and resource-sharing mechanisms (? = 0.134, p < 0.001) significantly influence the implementation of GAPs. In contrast, adherence to existing laws and regulations showed no statistically significant effect (? = 0.018, p = 0.587). These findings underscore the importance of decentralised authority, effective intergovernmental communication, and coordinated resource allocation in strengthening agricultural governance. The study recommends more targeted policy reforms that empower local governments and foster institutional synergy to enhance GAP implementation, thereby contributing to Tanzania’s agricultural transformation and broader development objectives. It is therefore, the study reinforce the need for integrated governance as a pathway to achieving agricultural modernisation and food security goals in line with SDG 2.
Keywords: {'name': 'Central government'}, {'name': 'Local government'}, {'name': 'Central-Local government Interface'}, {'name': 'Good Agriculture Practice (GAP)'}, {'name': 'Implementation of GAP'}, {'name': 'Formal Interface'}
Authors & affiliations
Sarah Killagane
Affiliation not supplied
David Mhando
Affiliation not supplied
Pius Nyamhanga
Affiliation not supplied
Christopher Mahonge
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.59298/JBESS/2024/91.5568000
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012194
DOI: 10.33423/ajm.v22i2.5332
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-009-9171-8
DOI: 10.1111/spol.12690
Badewa, S. (2023). The government's role in promoting sustainable agriculture in Nigeria. Retrieved from AgriLinks: https://agrilinks.org/post/governments-role-promoting-sustainable-agriculture-nigeria
DOI: 10.3390/su16052185
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2023.2211010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_63-1
Blumberg, B. (2018). Research methods (2nd ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2018.1427486
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096514002200
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25855
DOI: 10.4324/9780203720967
Cresswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods approach (2nd ed.). California, US: Thousand Oaks Sage.
DOI: 10.2307/3069284
DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.158
DOI: 10.1177/1078087417737181
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
Estremera, M., & Mendoza-Sarmiento, M.A. (2024). Content validity and reliability of questionnaires: Trends, prospects and innovation in the digital research epoch. Annunciation College of Bacon, 1-7. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34015.64166
Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). (2019). Food outlook-biannual report on global food markets. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Rome, Italy: FAO.
DOI: 10.1017/S030574101700087X
DOI: 10.4324/9780429056765
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010506
IFAD. (2023). Ghana Agricultural Sector Investment Programme. Ghana: IFAD.
Ify, I.P. (2021). A synopsis of state-local intergovernmental relations. Canadian Social Science, 17(2), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.3968/12052
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117668
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.007
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jppol.2022.004.01.03
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100447
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.012
DOI: 10.4097/kja.19087
Kiwale, E.N. (2013). The impact of decentralisation of central government functions to the local authorities in Tanzania: A case study of Kilosa District Council. Dar es Salaam: The Open University of Tanzania.
Kulaya, P.M. (2020). The role of government intervention on agricultural growth in Tanzania: Case of cotton. Dar es Salaam: Open University of Tanzania.
DOI: 10.5130/cjlg.vi25.6472
DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2017.1341445
DOI: 10.4337/9781789901917.00023
DOI: 10.4337/9781782547419
DOI: 10.31449/inf.v42i4.1862
Mitschke, V. (2017). Inducing the adoption of good agricultural practices by educating Tanzanian smallholder farmers – What works best and at what costs? Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen University.
DOI: 10.13189/nrc.2016.040401
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10090418
Mwasaga, B.G. (2020). Inter-governmental relations between central government and local government authorities in fostering sustainable urban development in Tanzania. Perugia, Italy: University of Perugia.
Ngatunga, R. (2020). The influence of human resource management on the performance of local government authorities in Tanzania: A study of Kasulu District Council. Dar es Salaam: The Open University of Tanzania.
DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2238395
DOI: 10.1002/bsd2.151
Olayemi, S.S., Oko, A.A., & Oduntan, F.T. (2020). Adoption of Appropriate Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Technologies among Smallholder Farmers in Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Sustainability, and Food Sufficiency, 7(02), 447-458.
Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Romania: Bridge Center.
DOI: 10.5455/ijamd.161640
DOI: 10.1177/001041400003300605
Pretorius, M.C. (2017). The Influence of Political and Administrative Interaction on Municipal Service Delivery in Selected Municipalities in the Free State Province. Bloemfontein, South Africa: University of Technology, Free State.
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.016
DOI: 10.4236/jacen.2023.122013
Reddy, S.A. (2019). On Agricultural Resources Sharing among the Small and Medium Scale Farmers in India. South Asian Anthropologist, 19(1), 67-75.
Sang, J. (2016). Communication Channels as Implementation Determinants of Performance Management Framework in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(17), 28–37.
DOI: 10.3233/IP-170415
Saunders, M., & Lewis, P. (2017). Doing research in business and management. Peerson. New Jersey, US: Prentice Hall.
DOI: 10.47535/1991ojbe179
DOI: 10.12691/ajams-8-2-1
DOI: 10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64865-7
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2016.1277529
United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2013). National Agriculture Policy. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperatives.
United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2021). National Five-Year Development Plan 2021/22-2025/26. Dodoma, Tanzania: Ministry of Finance and Planning.
Vijayakumar, S., Saravanane, P., Panda, B., Poonam, A., Subramanian, E., & Govindasamy, P. (2022). Good Agricultural Practices for sustainable food and nutritional security. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research. http://epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IndFarm/article/view/120642
Vinod, C., & Anand, H. (2017). Research Methodology (1 ed.). New Delhi: Pearson India.
DOI: 10.1108/CMS-12-2018-0778
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107644
Yoon, Y., Lee, H., Kim, S., Gwak, E., Lee, J., Ha, J., & Pyun, J. (2014). 2014 Modularisation of Korea's Development Experience: Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Agricultural Food Safety Management. Republic of Korea: Sookmyung Women's University.
DOI: 10.3390/land11101669