Bridging the digital divide: enhancing emergency remote teaching through strategies informed by senior academics at a South African university of technology

Abstract

The rapid shift to Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) during the COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant challenges within higher education (HE), particularly in rural and under-resourced institutions. While ERT enabled academic continuity, it highlighted critical gaps in digital infrastructure, staff preparedness, and institutional support. This study explores senior academics' strategies to enhance ERT at a rural University of Technology (UoT) in South Africa, emphasising the need for sustainable solutions beyond temporary crisis responses. Employing a qualitative, phenomenological research design, the study collected data through individual semi-structured interviews with twelve senior academic personnel who experienced the transition to ERT first-hand. Thematic analysis using NVivo software identified key strategic themes, including addressing issues of technological capacity, inadequate professional development, and compromised academic integrity during remote assessments. Findings revealed the need for continuous staff training, improved online learning platforms with enhanced security features, and collaborative partnerships to support resource-constrained institutions. The study’s significance lies in addressing the overlooked experiences of rural senior academic personnel, often neglected in ERT literature focused on well-resourced institutions and a diverse population that lacks seniority. The research recommends implementing structured, ongoing professional development, investment in digital infrastructure, and establishing national policies ensuring equitable access to online learning resources. This study provides critical insights for policymakers, educators, and institutional leaders seeking to bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access to quality education during future disruptions.

Keywords: {'name': 'Strategies, Emergency Remote Teaching, Senior Academics, Higher Education, Rural Institutions, Online learning'}

Authors & affiliations

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.31681/jetol.726441

DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22842

Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., & Razak, N. (2023). Understanding population and sample in research: Key concepts for valid conclusions. Sigcs: E-Learning, 6, 19-24.

DOI: 10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168

DOI: 10.5539/hes.v10n3p16

Allo, M. D. G. (2020). Is the online learning good in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1-10.

DOI: 10.5539/ies.v14n9p108

DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0106

Bri, D., García, M., Coll, H., & Lloret, J. (2009). A study of virtual learning environments. Wseas Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 6(1), 33-43.

Burton, C. (2022). Mastering learning experience design: Tips to engage and inspire your audience. eLearning Industry. Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/members/colin-burton (Accessed: 20 December 2024).

DOI: 10.20448/jeelr.v9i3.4102

DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2019.00067

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Davies, C., & Fisher, M. (2018). Understanding research paradigms. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 21(3), 21-25. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.160174725752074

DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102556

DOI: 10.1109/ICEET56468.2022.10007142

DOI: 10.17159/2223-0386/2020/n24a7

DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2021.1931836

DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

DOI: 10.31838/jcr.07.05.23

DOI: 10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474

Guba, E. G. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage.

DOI: 10.47622/978-1-928331-30-8

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.

Iatridis, K. (2022). The impact of introducing e-learning in secondary education during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study of “Orosimo 2001,” a tutoring school in northeast Greece, based on teachers’ perspective.

Islam, M. S. (2019). Bangladeshi university students’ perception about using Google Classroom for teaching English. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 8(2), 57-65. https://www.perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/160

DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v9i2.4541

Kalpana, T. (2014). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27-29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.05.004

Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for a beginner (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Lillejord, S., Børte, K., & Ruud, E. (2018). Teaching and learning with technology in higher education.

DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa7

DOI: 10.12973/ijem.8.2.275

Marek, K. (2009). Learning to teach online: Creating a culture of support for faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 275-292.

Mcleod, S. (2023). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology. Available at: https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html (Accessed: 22 December 2024).

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3581351

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3218

DOI: 10.24294/jipd11507

DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v9i3.5419

DOI: 10.3390/su15129522

DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.033

Pashaliev, E. (2021). Investigating the online teaching experiences of educators during the COVID-19 lockdown (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).

DOI: 10.1177/2347631120983481

SABC NEWS. (2024). Unisa investigating over 1,400 cases of academic dishonesty. [Online]. Available at: https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/unisa-investigating-about-1-4000-cases-of-academic-dishonesty/ (Accessed: 03 January 2025).

Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness, and 'teacher-presence': Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146-169. https://org/doi/10.3316/informit.592198797344699

DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2019.1704232

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24969

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.213

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w

Van Biljon, J., & Dembskey, E. (2011). Learning tools in resource-constrained environments: Learning from e-learning in the time of m-learning. In ICT for Development: People, Policy, and Practice. IDIA2011 Conference Proceedings, Lima, Peru (pp. 26-28).

DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2061006