Between expression and equality: Constitutional challenges in adjudicating racially charged political speech in South Africa
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 5 · 507-514
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:46 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This article critically examines the constitutional tension between the right to freedom of expression and the rights to equality and dignity in adjudicating racially charged political speech in South Africa. It focuses on the controversial chant "Kill the Boer" and interrogates how courts navigate the competing imperatives of protecting political expression while upholding non-racialism, equality, and human dignity. Through doctrinal and comparative analysis, including cases from Kenya and Rwanda, the article identifies inconsistencies in South African jurisprudence, particularly regarding symbolic speech and its real-world impact on minority communities. It highlights the judiciary's tendency to underplay psychological and symbolic harm, which undermines public trust and the transformative vision of the Constitution. The article further addresses the study's limitations, such as the limited engagement with primary data and potential judicial biases. It proposes reforms that prioritise restorative constitutionalism and a more context-sensitive approach to adjudicating hate speech, considering the feasibility of such measures within South Africa’s resource-constrained legal framework. The study contributes to broader debates on how transitional democracies can address historical injustice without enabling new forms of exclusion or harm.
Keywords: {'name': 'Freedom of expression'}, {'name': 'racial incitement'}, {'name': 'constitutional rights'}, {'name': 'South Africa'}, {'name': 'hate speech'}, {'name': 'political speech'}, {'name': 'equality'}, {'name': 'dignity'}, {'name': 'judiciary'}
Authors & affiliations
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
AfriForum v Economic Freedom Fighters and Others (1105/2022) [2024] ZASCA 82; [2024] 3 All SA 319 (SCA); 2024 (10) BCLR 1275 (SCA); 2024 (6) SA 1 (SCA) (28 May 2024). https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2024/82.html
Article 19. (1992). Striking a balance: Hate speech, freedom of expression and non-discrimination. ARTICLE 19. https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/striking-a-balance.pdf
Du Plessis, L. (2008). Interpretation. In S. Woolman & M. Bishop (Eds.), Constitutional law of South Africa (2nd ed., ch. 32). Juta & Co. https://constitutionallawofsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Chap32.pdf
DOI: 10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a7520
DOI: 10.4314/pelj.v16i5.8
DOI: 10.2989/CCR.2021.0012
DOI: 10.1080/02587203.1998.11834974
Krüger, R. (2011). Small steps to equal dignity: The work of the South African equality courts. The Equal Rights Review, 7, 27–43. https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/ERR7_kruger.pdf
Milo, D., Penfold, G., & Stein, A. (2008). Freedom of expression. In S. Woolman & M. Bishop (Eds.), Constitutional law of South Africa (2nd ed., ch. 42). Juta & Co. https://constitutionallawofsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Chap42.pdf
DOI: 10.17159/2077-4907/2020/ldd.v24.14
Nyathi, N. (2017). South Africa and Kenya’s legislative measures to prevent hate speech. Conflict Trends, 2017(2). https://www.accord.org.za/conflict-trends/south-africa-kenyas-legislative-measures-prevent-hate-speech/
Nyathi, N. (2018). The poverty of law: A critical analysis of hate speech jurisprudence in South Africa (Master’s thesis, University of Pretoria). University of Pretoria Repository. https://repository.up.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/d9cb41ab-71b8-4d86-a9ba-a2d699141d9d/content
Ramalekana, N. (2021). Towards a transformative approach to affirmative action in South Africa [Doctoral thesis, University of Oxford]. Oxford University Research Archive. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f7151de1-2b21-441f-b545-82a8758b6ea2
Scheffler, A. (2015). The inherent danger of hate speech legislation: A case study from Rwanda and Kenya on the failure of a preventative measure. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, fesmedia Africa. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/africa-media/12462.pdf
Smith, A. (2014). Equality constitutional adjudication in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 14(2), 609–632.
DOI: 10.4314/pelj.v16i5.7