Constitutionalism under pressure: Evaluating the legal framework for a government of national unity in South Africa
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 5 · 491-498
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The establishment of South Africa’s 2024 Government of National Unity (GNU) marks a significant departure from post-apartheid electoral norms, raising critical questions about the constitutional viability of coalition governance amid political fragmentation. This paper interrogates whether the existing constitutional framework adequately supports a GNU model under contemporary conditions of socio-economic strain and institutional fragility. Through a qualitative legal analysis of constitutional texts, key policy documents, political declarations, and jurisprudential trends, the study assesses how mechanisms such as separation of powers, executive authority, and intergovernmental cooperation are interpreted and deployed within unity arrangements. It traces the historical emergence of power-sharing in South Africa, comparing the 1994 transitional GNU to the current iteration, and identifies core challenges such as executive ambiguity, accountability erosion, and legal uncertainty. The paper further evaluates the role of civil society, the judiciary, and political culture in safeguarding constitutional order. By synthesizing insights from state performance, party behavior, and legal analysis, it identifies both limitations and reform opportunities within South Africa’s constitutional architecture. The study concludes with recommendations for strengthening democratic resilience through clearer legal design, institutional clarity, and enhanced civic engagement, contributing to global discourse on constitutional adaptability in emerging democracies.
Keywords: {'name': 'Government of National Unity'}, {'name': 'Constitutional Accountability'}, {'name': 'Coalition Governance'}, {'name': 'South African Constitution'}, {'name': 'Legal Framework'}, {'name': 'Political Stability'}, {'name': 'Rule of Law'}
Authors & affiliations
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
African National Congress. (2024, June 14). Statement of intent of the 2024 Government of National Unity. https://www.anc1912.org.za/statement-of-intent-of-the-2024-government-of-national-unity-2/
Alexander, W. (2025, April 7). Review of the first 100 days of the Government of National Unity. Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. https://www.freiheit.org/sub-saharan-africa/review-first-100-days-government-national-unity
Andrews, P., & Ellmann, S. (2001). Introduction: Towards understanding South African constitutionalism. Articles & Chapters, 1076. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters/1076
Beukes, J., Chigwata, T., & de Visser, J. (2024). Unpacking the 2024 Government of National Unity in South Africa: Challenges, opportunities and lessons for stable coalition governance. Dullah Omar Institute. https://dullahomarinstitute.org.za/multilevel-govt/publications/doi-policy-brief-on-gnus.pdf
Bilchitz, D., Glaser, D., Konstant, A., Du Toit, L., Moshikaro, K., & Werbeloff, M. (2016). Assessing the performance of the South African Constitution. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). https://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/assessing-the-performance-of-the-south-african-constitution.pdf
Constitutional Court of South Africa. (1996, September 6). Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (CCT 23/96) [1996] ZACC 26; 1996 (4) SA 744 (CC); 1996 (10) BCLR 1253 (CC). https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1996/26.html
Govender, K. (2013). Power and constraints in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. African Human Rights Law Journal, 13(1), 82–102. https://www.ahrlj.up.ac.za/govender-k
Hairsine, K. (2024, June 11). South Africa's national unity government: Pros and cons explored. DW. https://www.dw.com/en/south-africas-national-unity-government-pros-and-cons-explored/a-69334735
Michelman, F. I. (2005). The rule of law, legality and the supremacy of the Constitution. In S. Woolman, T. Roux, J. Klaaren, A. Stein, & M. Chaskalson (Eds.), Constitutional law of South Africa (2nd ed., OS 02-05, ch. 11). Juta & Company Ltd. https://constitutionallawofsouthafrica.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Chap11.pdf
Nelson Mandela Foundation. (n.d.). 3.1 The path to a Government of National Unity. The Presidential Years. https://tpy.nelsonmandela.org/pages/part-i-democratic-breakthrough/forming-the-government-of-national-unity/3-1-the-path-to-a-government-of-national-unity
Ragolane, M., & Khoza, N. G. (2024, November 26). The role of political compromise in South Africa’s Government of National Unity: Balancing competing interests for stability and peacebuilding. ACCORD. https://www.accord.org.za/conflict-trends/the-role-of-political-compromise-in-south-africas-government-of-national-unity-balancing-competing-interests-for-stability-and-peacebuilding/
Schreiber, L. (2016). ‘Reconciling the impossible’: South Africa’s Government of National Unity, 1994–1996. Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. https://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf5601/files/LS_POWERSHARING_South%20Africa_FORMATTED_19Dec2016_USIPLogo.pdf
Steytler, N. (2024, November 14). South Africa’s government of national unity: Power sharing in a fractured democracy. IACL-AIDC Blog. https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2024-posts/2024/11/14/south-africas-government-of-national-unity-power-sharing-in-a-fractured-democracy
Strydom, H. A. (1997). South African constitutionalism between unity and diversity: Lessons from the new Europe. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 24(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA02586568_974
The Conversation. (2024, December 12). South Africa in 2025: 8 key factors that will shape the future and test the government. https://theconversation.com/south-africa-in-2025-8-key-factors-that-will-shape-the-future-and-test-the-government-247379