Innovation: A labour productivity improvement strategy for the automotive assembly organisation in South Africa

Abstract

Over the years, productivity performance has been the subject that generated enormous interest amongst economic scholars.  This shows the value of productivity on business growth.  Hence, the implementation of improved interventions for productivity improvement requires appropriate innovative practices for industries.  This sentiment supports the importance of innovation for productivity improvement.   Consequently, this study assesses the influence of innovation on labour productivity in an automotive assembly organisation in South Africa.  It has been established that the manufacturing industry in South Africa has low labour productivity compared with its BRICS counterpart countries like Russia, India and China.  As a result, this study centres its attention on innovation, considering low levels of labour productivity in the manufacturing sector of South Africa. It was quantitative in design and the investigation was achieved by collecting pre-and post-innovative quarterly data for spoilage and the achievement of production targets.  The study analysed the production and related experiences of an automotive assembly organisation, operating in KwaZulu-Natal in the eThekwini Municipality that had adopted an innovative seat-handling manipulator in its assembly process.  The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model, using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), was used to analyse data.  The study indicates that spoilage rate and the achievement of production targets have the relationship with labour productivity after an innovative seat handling manipulator was implemented in the organisation.

Keywords: {'name': 'Automotive Assembly Organisation, Labour Productivity, Innovative Seat Handling Manipulator, Spoilage Rate.'}

Authors & affiliations

Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3

DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2016-0025

DOI: 10.1111/emre.12047

DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0219-2

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016

DOI: 10.2307/30040711

Business Victoria. (2016). Increase profitability and staff retention with an innovative culture. State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford Press.

DOI: 10.1177/0018726701541010

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004

CEIC. (2020). Labour productivity growth by country comparison. www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/countries/labour-productivity-growth [Accessed 14 August 2020].

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0676

Curwin, J., & Slater, R. (2002). Quantitative methods for business decisions. British Library Cataloguing Data.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x

DOI: 10.1177/002224299405800404

DOI: 10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171.

DOI: 10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00024-9

DOI: 10.1108/03090560810840934

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026

DOI: 10.1186/2192-5372-2-15

DOI: 10.1177/002224299806200403

Hauschildt, J., & Salomo, S. (2007). Innovations management. München.

DOI: 10.1108/14601061211192861

Herzog, P. (2011). Open and closed innovation: Different cultures for different strategies (2nd ed.). Gabler Verlag.

DOI: 10.1108/02635571111099758

DOI: 10.1108/02656710610704230

DOI: 10.1108/JABS-11-2017-0206

DOI: 10.2307/20159575

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010

DOI: 10.1108/IJoEM-08-2017-0314

DOI: 10.1504/IJPQM.2017.082831

Kelloway, K., Francis, I., & Montgomery, M. (2006). Management of occupational health and safety (3rd ed.). Thompson Nelson.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.003

DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761

DOI: 10.5089/9781475502824.001

DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-05-2015-0034

DOI: 10.2307/3069392

DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2016.11.002

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.02.005

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.034

DOI: 10.1080/14783360701600639

DOI: 10.1080/14783360601043179

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00614.x

Nowak, A. (1997). Strategic relationship between quality management and product innovation. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 33(2), 119.

OECD. (2005). Oslo manual - Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD.

DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-02-2013-0015

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.002

DOI: 10.1080/00207540802070934

Porkess, R. (2005). Collins internet-linked dictionary of statistics. HarperCollins.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.001

DOI: 10.1108/02656710310493625

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.004

DOI: 10.1108/TQM-07-2017-0074

DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-12-2014-0119

Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002

DOI: 10.1921/swssr.v17i1.546

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.013

Sainfo. (2018). South Africa’s automotive industry. http://www.southafrica.info/doing_business/economy/key_sectors/motorindustryboost.html [Viewed 14 February 2019].

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.014

DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.08.002

DOI: 10.1186/s40887-015-0004-8

DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2012-0098

The Conference Board. (2015). Productivity brief 2015: Global productivity stuck in the slow lane with no signs of recovery in sight. Business World, New York.

DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-05-2012-0025

DOI: 10.1002/smj.738

DOI: 10.1108/14601061011040221

DOI: 10.1108/01437721111158189

Yin, R. K. (2008). Handbook of applied research. Sage.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.024

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.141

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.006

DOI: 10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1773