Evaluating the effectiveness of social media advertising strategies across different demographics and platforms

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the effects of demographic targeting, platform selection, and engagement metrics on the effectiveness of social media advertising campaigns. In this paper, it is also aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of how these factors influence conversion outcomes. We employed a hybrid analytics method combining ANOVA, correlation, and regression analysis to examine patterns of user engagement and ad performance. A dataset of 200,235 ad campaign records conducted in the United States was analyzed to assess variations across gender, age groups, and platforms. The main findings of the study demonstrate that (i) women consistently exhibited higher conversion rates compared to men, highlighting the potential of gender-specific content strategies; (ii) users aged 35–44 achieved the highest engagement, suggesting that middle-aged audiences may be more responsive to targeted campaigns; and finally, (iii) among platforms, Instagram led in conversion performance, while Facebook showed comparable engagement rates, and both significantly outperformed other platforms in terms of overall impact. Click-through rate was found to be moderately correlated with conversions, whereas impressions showed weak returns, indicating diminishing value at higher exposure levels. These results underscore the importance of optimizing both message and delivery channel to specific audience segments.This study contributes to digital marketing literature by integrating demographic variables, engagement indicators, and platform performance into a unified model. The insights derived offer practical implications for businesses and advertisers aiming to enhance return on investment and optimize campaign strategies in a fast-paced, digitally driven advertising landscape.

Keywords: {'name': 'Social Media Advertising, Demographic Targeting, Platform Performance, Conversion Optimization, Digital Campaign Analytics'}

Authors & affiliations

Mersid Poturak
Affiliation not supplied

Dzeneta Durakovic
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1515/commun-2020-0053

DOI: 10.1108/SJME-09-2018-0042

DOI: 10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6755

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

DOI: 10.1007/s11846-022-00535-7

DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2021.1965888

DOI: 10.1504/IJTMKT.2017.089646

DOI: 10.1108/JBS-07-2014-0086

DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.003

DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2021.1997455

Investopedia. (2024). Facebook vs. X vs. Instagram: What’s the difference? Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com

DOI: 10.1080/10496491.2020.1851847

DOI: 10.1509/jmr.11.0503

DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/15444

DOI: 10.1504/IJPM.2020.105191

Patil, B. S., Pandey, S., Poonam, Mishra, A., Swadia, B. U. (2022). Marketing campaigns targeting Millennials and Generation Z: Comparative analysis. British Journal of Administrative Management, 58(151), 126.

DOI: 10.4018/IJTHI.2022010106

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04284

Pew Research Center. (2024). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/

DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i1.3338

DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2019.1646517

DOI: 10.22452/IJIE.vol16no4.5

DOI: 10.1177/21582440231219096

Statista. (2025). Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2025, ranked by number of monthly active users. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com

DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2021.0107

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115954

DOI: 10.52783/jier.v5i1.2227