Salient underlying determinants contributing to the endemic prevalence of feminized poverty in Limpopo province, South Africa

Abstract

Poverty remains a pervasive global challenge, disproportionately affecting women, with profound implications for their well-being and that of their families. The aim of the study was critically examining the underlying factors contributing to the high incidence of poverty among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa. The primary concern of this study is the alarming prevalence of poverty among women in Limpopo, a situation that has far-reaching consequences for both individual lives and broader societal structures. By exploring the social, economic, and cultural dimensions that perpetuate poverty, this study seeks to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on poverty and gender inequality in South Africa. Through a qualitative research approach, the study identified key factors that exacerbate women's vulnerability to poverty, including gender-based violence, limited access to education and healthcare, and social exclusion. The sample for this study consisted of five women selected to explore the phenomenon of feminized poverty. The sampling procedure used in this research was based on a non-probability sampling technique, specifically purposive sampling. purposive sampling was used to select five women who had experiences of feminized poverty, understood as the disproportionate representation of women among the poor due to gendered social, economic, and political factors. The data was collected using Semi-structured interviews to get firsthand experience from women. The collected data was analyzed thematically. The researcher went through the data, coding the text, and classifying the codes into more general themes that correspond to the research objectives. The study's findings demonstrated that social isolation and restricted access to basic services exacerbate this vulnerability. The study also found that because women are routinely excluded from social support that might enable them to become economically independent or break free from poverty, this kind of exclusion perpetuates cycles of poverty. The findings offered valuable insights for policymakers to create sustainable strategies that support gender equality and alleviate poverty in the region.

Keywords: {'name': 'Poverty, Women, Social Exclusion, Gender Inequality'}

Authors & affiliations

Decent Munzhelele
Affiliation not supplied

Phoke Alpha Rakgwata
Affiliation not supplied

Nngodiseni Jimmy Budeli
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Addabbo, T., & Vuri, D. (2021). The feminization of poverty in Europe: A comprehensive review of policy responses. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928721100167

DOI: 10.5430/elr.v3n1p39

Baker, T., & Marshall, D. (2020). Rural youth unemployment and the role of education and skills training. Journal of Rural Development, 56(3), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrd.12348

Bauer, M., Horn, A., & Chisholm, K. (2021). Healthcare disparities in rural South Africa: Challenges and interventions. South African Journal of Public Health, 45(4), 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1186/s2399-6367-45-4-678

Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. S. (2022). Gender, development, and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered. Routledge.

Bhalla, A. S., & Lapeyre, F. (2016). Poverty and exclusion in a global world. Springer.

Boserup, R., & Dufresne, A. (2021). Gender and poverty: Examining the impact of care work on feminized poverty in the global North. Journal of Poverty, 25(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2021.1873457

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (2020). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Polity Press.

Bradshaw, S., & Linneker, B. (2023). Feminized poverty and migration: The impact of gendered labor in the Global South. International Migration Review, 57(3), 586-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231112877

DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2018.1529417

DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12562

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0306-x

DOI: 10.1108/IJGE-09-2012-0035

Chen, H., & Boore, J. (2017). A review of the use of semi-structured interview for qualitative research. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness, 9, 21-30.

Cohen, R. L., & Ghosh, S. (2021). Feminized poverty and the care economy: An intersectional approach. Feminist Economics, 27(4), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1947456

Crenshaw, K. (2021). Intersectionality: A black feminist critique of postmodernism and poverty. Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Crompton, R. (2022). Women and work in the global economy: The persistence of feminized poverty. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 29(2), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxw039

DOI: 10.4324/9780203843123

De Vos, A., Strydom, H., Fouche, C., & Delport, C. (2011). Research at grass roots for Social Sciences and Human Services Professionals. Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria.

Deere, C. D., & León, M. (2021). The feminization of poverty and the politics of care in Latin America. University of Chicago Press.

Dube, S., Phasha, T., & Mkhize, N. (2021). Rural poverty and access to resources: The case of Limpopo Province. Development Southern Africa, 38(1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2020.1743038

DOI: 10.1257/jel.50.4.1051

Duflo, E. (2023). Women’s empowerment and poverty alleviation: A review of evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 61(2), 567-591. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201543

Elson, D. (2014). Gender and the informal economy: An analysis of women's participation in the economy. In J. Tinker (Ed.), Women and development: A key issue for the twenty-first century (pp. 203-225). Routledge.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.002

Gherghina, R. D. (2021). Economic insecurity, feminized poverty, and social vulnerability: A comparative study of women in post-socialist Europe. Social Indicators Research, 158(1), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02614-z

DOI: 10.4324/9781315231020-23

Hart, R., & Chamberlain, A. (2023). Gender disparities in poverty: A comparative analysis of women’s and men’s economic well-being in advanced economies. Journal of Social Policy, 52(1), 118-139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000297

DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12388

Kabeer, N. (2021). Gendered poverty: Toward a feminist critique of global development. Third World Quarterly, 42(8), 1541-1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1925160

DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12458

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.

DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12429

Makoni, N., & Moyo, F. (2021). Women’s participation in the informal economy: Economic survival strategies in South Africa’s rural areas. African Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 32(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508201.2021.1854998

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

DOI: 10.4081/gh.2015.358

DOI: 10.3390/biom10121659

Mishra, S. (2018). Feminization of poverty and dimension of women’s agencies. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(2), 93-100.

Moghadam, V. M. (2023). Feminist struggles and feminist policy in a world of precarious work. Routledge.

DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847

DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12405

Nussbaum, M. (2022). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.

DOI: 10.1177/0169796X13516351

Peterson, E. M., & Stoll, M. A. (2021). Feminized poverty in urban America: A study of the intersectionality of race, gender, and economic insecurity. Urban Studies, 58(3), 612-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211003057

DOI: 10.4324/9781315416816

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102384

Sachs, J. (2021). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. Penguin Press.

Sen, A. (2023). Development as freedom (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Smith, L. (2015). Psychology, poverty, and the end of social exclusion: Putting our practice to work. Teachers College Press.

DOI: 10.1111/spol.12824

Staudt, K., & Mazur, A. (2022). Feminized poverty in the context of global health: A critical review. Global Public Health, 17(6), 877-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2022.2040219

DOI: 10.1002/pam.22334

Tischler, V., & O'Connor, J. (2021). Intersectionality, feminized poverty, and migrant labor: A study of domestic workers in Southeast Asia. Gender & Development, 29(3), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2021.1986502

Weitzman, L. (2022). Feminized poverty and the global financial crisis: Impact and response. Palgrave Macmillan.

Williams, P., & Anderson, C. (2021). Feminized poverty and its global consequences: The rise of female-headed households. Global Poverty Journal, 25(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/gpo.12345

Yu, S., & Wang, W. (2021). Gender inequality and the feminization of poverty: A study of single mothers in China. Chinese Journal of Social Work, 10(2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2021.1900674

Zhao, H., & Liu, J. (2023). The feminization of poverty in East Asia: The effects of economic policies on women's income disparities. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 17(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12356

Zinn, H., & Gray, T. (2020). Feminized poverty, gendered violence, and economic inequality in Latin America: Policy challenges and future directions. Journal of Latin American Studies, 52(3), 745-764. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X20000428