Assessing the impact of e-learning within the higher education sector: A perspective of South African universities

Abstract

This study aims to assess the e-learning difficulties faced by students at South African public higher education institutions, given the increasing reliance on online learning as a core mode of teaching and learning. The researchers critically analyzed previous research on technology in higher education to identify gaps in existing knowledge. The study adopted the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the theoretical framework to guide the investigation. A quantitative research method was employed, using surveys distributed to experts from various faculties, departments, and students. This approach enabled the collection of data regarding the perceived challenges and barriers to e-learning. The findings revealed that students encountered significant challenges in e-learning, including issues related to digital literacy, limited access to resources, unreliable internet connectivity, and high data costs. These barriers are exacerbated by the disadvantaged and poverty-stricken backgrounds of many students in South African public institutions. Additionally, educators and course designers also face challenges in effectively implementing e-learning solutions. Addressing these challenges is essential for the successful adoption and integration of e-learning in South African higher education institutions. The study suggests that overcoming systemic issues—such as improving digital literacy, enhancing infrastructure, and reducing data costs—could unlock the full potential of e-learning. This could lead to more inclusive, accessible, and effective higher education. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by identifying specific barriers to e-learning adoption in South African public higher education institutions. It emphasizes the importance of addressing these challenges to harness the potential of technology-enhanced learning and promote inclusivity in higher education. The findings provide insights into how policy makers, educators, and institutions can better support students and course designers in the transition to e-learning environments.

Keywords: {'name': 'E-learning'}, {'name': 'South African Higher Education Institutions'}, {'name': 'Technology Acceptance Model'}

Authors & affiliations

Tshepo Mabotja
Affiliation not supplied

Winiswa Mavutha
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Aali, M., Narenji Thani, F., Keramati, M. R., & Garavand, A. (2020). A model for effectiveness of e-learning at university. Journal of Information Technology Management, 12(4), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2020.298696.2479

DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v10i6.pp6484-6496

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31129-2_37

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10201-8

DOI: 10.1177/20427530241239433

Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption (pp. 205–219). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/b/busadwp/images/b/1/4/b1409190.0001.001.pdf

Glazer, F. S. (Ed.). (2023). Blended learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Taylor & Francis.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008

DOI: 10.28945/4822

Helsper, E., & Smirnova, S. (2019). Youth inequalities in digital interactions and well-being.

DOI: 10.37464/2015.322.1573

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-26490-0_9

DOI: 10.11114/jets.v8i11.5004

DOI: 10.21240/mpaed/35/2019.10.17.X

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.009

Luescher, T., Mncwango, B., Fongwa, S., Oppelt, T., Mthombeni, Z., & Paterson, M. (2021). The state of transformation in South Africa’s public universities. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/21354

DOI: 10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i5.3315

DOI: 10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679

Nikou, S., Kim, S., Lim, C., & Maslov, I. (2021). Satisfaction with e-learning systems during the COVID-19 pandemic – A comparative study. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/238042

Nguyen, B. H. M. (2022). Students’ experiences of flow, satisfaction, and learning outcome in an online learning context (Master’s thesis, NTNU). https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3011171

DOI: 10.20853/32-5-2599

Panyajamorn, T., Suanmali, S., Kohda, Y., Chongphaisal, P., & Supnithi, T. (2018). Effectiveness of e-learning design in Thai public schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 1–34.

Pillay, D. (2022). Developing creativity in entrepreneurs – A scoping review (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch University). http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/124551

DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-01260

DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-166-1_45

DOI: 10.3926/jotse.1025

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410

DOI: 10.3390/publications8040048

DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1341940

DOI: 10.15700/saje.v40n4a2039

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106624