The paradox of gender inequity in democratic societies: Exploring systemic contradictions in pursuit of equality
Tshepo Patrick Mbowane ORCID ↗ · Lusani Randima ORCID ↗ · Phoke Alpha Rakgwata ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 6 · 270-277
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:32 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
In a country where gender inequity had been a factor that discriminated against women, many endeavors have been put up in attempts to balance both genders. The initiatives promoting gender equity seek to redress historical imbalances; they inadvertently perpetuate gender inequality due to systemic biases and societal resistance. However, a little too much has been done to the point where the discrimination has seemingly fallen on men. The study aimed to investigate the factors that cause gender inequity, from discriminating against women to discriminating against men. Formal legal rights do not always translate into substantive equality, particularly in areas such as wage equity, political representation, and reproductive autonomy. The study employed desktop comprehensive data to review existing literature from journal articles, Google Scholar sources, and government documents that align with the study. The data was analyzed through content analysis. The findings of this study concretized the public about the extent to which gender inequity is being ignored when it favors one gender over the other. The study further contributed to the ongoing discourse on gender issues and highlights the need for more effective strategies that address the roots of gender inequality in a democratic context. The implications suggest that achieving accurate gender equity in democracies requires more than legal reform; it demands structural transformation, inclusive policymaking, and cultural change.
Keywords: {'name': 'Gender-equity, Gender-inequity, discrimination, inequality, Democratic countries.'}
Authors & affiliations
Tshepo Patrick Mbowane
Affiliation not supplied
Lusani Randima
Affiliation not supplied
Phoke Alpha Rakgwata
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Ashley, C. (2019). An Overview of Qualitative Research Methods. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/qualitative-research-methods-3026555
DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X19000886
Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2016). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 81(2), 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416632062
DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X22000460
Cardenas, C. (2023). The Role of Political Institutions in Reducing Gender Inequality: A Global Perspective. Gender & Politics, 19(1), 89-104.
DOI: 10.4337/9781788977098.00025
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x
Connell, R. W. (2015). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Kimmel, M. S. (2017). Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. Nation Books.
Council on Foreign Relations. (2024). Ailing Democracy and Declining Women's Representation: How They Are Related and What to Do About It. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/article/ailing-democracy-and-declining-womens-representation-how-they-are-related-and-what-do-about
Donno, D., & Kreft, A. K. (2023). International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 123-139.
DOI: 10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183
Elson, D., Seth, A., & Women, U. (2019). Gender equality and inclusive growth: economic policies to achieve sustainable development. UN Women.
Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2020). Gender and Policy Change: What Have We Learned? European Political Science Review, 12(4), 567-582.
Fraser, N. (2021). The Crisis of Care: Gender, Capitalism, and Democracy. Critical Inquiry, 47(4), 1-20.
Gerson, J. (2013, March 21). Privately run shelter for male victims of domestic abuse forced to close its doors due to lack of funding. Nationalpost; National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/privately-run-shelter-for-male-victims-of-domestic-abuse-forced-to-close-its-doors-due-to-lack-of-funding
Hassan, M. (2022). Content Analysis - Methods, Guide, Examples. Research Method. https://researchmethod.net/content-analysis/
Hassan, M. (2023). Secondary Data - Types, Methods and Examples. Research Method. https://researchmethod.net/secondary-data/#google_vignette
DOI: 10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss758
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin Books.
DOI: 10.1017/9781108277891
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12173
Johnson, C., & Lee, D. (2021). Gender impartiality of public institutions, religiosity, and satisfaction with democracy. Democratization, 28(7), 1353-1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1944600
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac122
Krook, M. L. (2021). Gender quotas and political representation: A global perspective. Comparative Politics, 53(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X16097570781907
Makhubu, N. (2024, April). South Africa men five times more likely to commit suicide. IOL News. https://www.iol.co.za/sundayindependent/news/south-africa-men-five-times-more-likely-to-commit-suicide-bcf166ae-6729-432d-b6ef-1f786c91931f
Miller, A. R., & Segal, C. (2024). Women's political empowerment, economic development, and public health outcomes. Applied Economics, 56(12), 1345-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2261087
Norris, P. (2023). Gender equality and democratic participation: A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review, 44(3), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121221075167
DOI: 10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
DOI: 10.1093/icon/mor068
DOI: 10.4324/9781351235105-3
Paxton, P., & Hughes, M. M. (2022). Women, politics, and power: A global perspective. SAGE Publications.
DOI: 10.1017/S0892679420000040
DOI: 10.1086/696148
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2022). Democracy, free elections, and gender equality as perceived by immigrants. Social Sciences, 11(11), 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110578
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12419
Stanford University. (2016). Men, masculinity, and the persistent nature of gender inequality. The Clayman Institute for Gender Research. https://gender.stanford.edu/news/men-masculinity-and-persistent-nature-gender-inequality
DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxy019
Waylen, G. (2021). Gender and governance in democratic transitions. Democratization, 28(5), 857-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1884049
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.71