CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

The paradox of gender inequity in democratic societies: Exploring systemic contradictions in pursuit of equality

Tshepo Patrick Mbowane ORCID ↗ · Lusani Randima ORCID ↗ · Phoke Alpha Rakgwata ORCID ↗

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 6 · 270-277

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC

Mendeley · Readers0Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:32 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

In a country where gender inequity had been a factor that discriminated against women, many endeavors have been put up in attempts to balance both genders. The initiatives promoting gender equity seek to redress historical imbalances; they inadvertently perpetuate gender inequality due to systemic biases and societal resistance. However, a little too much has been done to the point where the discrimination has seemingly fallen on men. The study aimed to investigate the factors that cause gender inequity, from discriminating against women to discriminating against men. Formal legal rights do not always translate into substantive equality, particularly in areas such as wage equity, political representation, and reproductive autonomy. The study employed desktop comprehensive data to review existing literature from journal articles, Google Scholar sources, and government documents that align with the study. The data was analyzed through content analysis. The findings of this study concretized the public about the extent to which gender inequity is being ignored when it favors one gender over the other. The study further contributed to the ongoing discourse on gender issues and highlights the need for more effective strategies that address the roots of gender inequality in a democratic context. The implications suggest that achieving accurate gender equity in democracies requires more than legal reform; it demands structural transformation, inclusive policymaking, and cultural change.

Keywords: {'name': 'Gender-equity, Gender-inequity, discrimination, inequality, Democratic countries.'}

Authors & affiliations

Tshepo Patrick Mbowane
Affiliation not supplied

Lusani Randima
Affiliation not supplied

Phoke Alpha Rakgwata
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Ashley, C. (2019). An Overview of Qualitative Research Methods. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/qualitative-research-methods-3026555

DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X19000886

Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2016). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 81(2), 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416632062

DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X22000460

Cardenas, C. (2023). The Role of Political Institutions in Reducing Gender Inequality: A Global Perspective. Gender & Politics, 19(1), 89-104.

DOI: 10.4337/9781788977098.00025

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x

Connell, R. W. (2015). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Kimmel, M. S. (2017). Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. Nation Books.

Council on Foreign Relations. (2024). Ailing Democracy and Declining Women's Representation: How They Are Related and What to Do About It. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/article/ailing-democracy-and-declining-womens-representation-how-they-are-related-and-what-do-about

Donno, D., & Kreft, A. K. (2023). International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 123-139.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183

Elson, D., Seth, A., & Women, U. (2019). Gender equality and inclusive growth: economic policies to achieve sustainable development. UN Women.

Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2020). Gender and Policy Change: What Have We Learned? European Political Science Review, 12(4), 567-582.

Fraser, N. (2021). The Crisis of Care: Gender, Capitalism, and Democracy. Critical Inquiry, 47(4), 1-20.

Gerson, J. (2013, March 21). Privately run shelter for male victims of domestic abuse forced to close its doors due to lack of funding. Nationalpost; National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/privately-run-shelter-for-male-victims-of-domestic-abuse-forced-to-close-its-doors-due-to-lack-of-funding

Hassan, M. (2022). Content Analysis - Methods, Guide, Examples. Research Method. https://researchmethod.net/content-analysis/

Hassan, M. (2023). Secondary Data - Types, Methods and Examples. Research Method. https://researchmethod.net/secondary-data/#google_vignette

DOI: 10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss758

Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin Books.

DOI: 10.1017/9781108277891

DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12173

Johnson, C., & Lee, D. (2021). Gender impartiality of public institutions, religiosity, and satisfaction with democracy. Democratization, 28(7), 1353-1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1944600

DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac122

Krook, M. L. (2021). Gender quotas and political representation: A global perspective. Comparative Politics, 53(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X16097570781907

Makhubu, N. (2024, April). South Africa men five times more likely to commit suicide. IOL News. https://www.iol.co.za/sundayindependent/news/south-africa-men-five-times-more-likely-to-commit-suicide-bcf166ae-6729-432d-b6ef-1f786c91931f

Miller, A. R., & Segal, C. (2024). Women's political empowerment, economic development, and public health outcomes. Applied Economics, 56(12), 1345-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2261087

Norris, P. (2023). Gender equality and democratic participation: A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review, 44(3), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121221075167

DOI: 10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419

DOI: 10.1093/icon/mor068

DOI: 10.4324/9781351235105-3

Paxton, P., & Hughes, M. M. (2022). Women, politics, and power: A global perspective. SAGE Publications.

DOI: 10.1017/S0892679420000040

DOI: 10.1086/696148

Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2022). Democracy, free elections, and gender equality as perceived by immigrants. Social Sciences, 11(11), 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110578

DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12419

Stanford University. (2016). Men, masculinity, and the persistent nature of gender inequality. The Clayman Institute for Gender Research. https://gender.stanford.edu/news/men-masculinity-and-persistent-nature-gender-inequality

DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxy019

Waylen, G. (2021). Gender and governance in democratic transitions. Democratization, 28(5), 857-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1884049

DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.71