Financialization of the economy and the primacy of rural development in South Africa
Kevin Meso · Sethuthuthu Lucky Vuma
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025 · Vol. 14 / Issue 7 · 306-315
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:46 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to demonstrate how financialization of the economy has created structural inequalities in South Africa; and to further demonstrate the pertinence of rural development in alleviating the structural repercussions of the finance dominated regime. Financialization of the South African economy relates to the supremacy of speculative reforms, finance and shareholder-oriented motives in the oversight of the economy. The paper exhibits the failures of the dominance of financial and profit-making efforts in South Africa. The paper uses desktop analysis and literature survey to theoretically explore the opportunity space of rural development as a response to the effects of financialization of the South African economy. The paper finds that financialization of the South African economy polarizes and spatialises income distribution for the benefit of the elite minority in the urban financial and corporate space while the rural poor are getting poorer. It further finds that government planning and policy making efforts do not respond directly to the causes of inequality which were framed by the exclusionary economic planning. Moreover, local policy making has left a lacuna in as far as rural community based financial reconstruction and rehabilitation is concerned; instead, development policies seem to give reverence to the accentuation of exclusionary planning for the elite minority. The paper posits that the opportunity space for rural development should be exploited and given concerted efforts to remedy the impact of financialisaton and exclusionary colonial planning. Lastly, community-based cooperatives should be prioritised as appropriate institutional role players in facilitating the process of inclusive and redistributive rural development in South Africa.
Keywords: {'name': 'Financialization, Rural Development, Inequality, South Africa'}
Authors & affiliations
Kevin Meso
Affiliation not supplied
Sethuthuthu Lucky Vuma
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.3390/su12010195
DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1121714
DOI: 10.1177/0032329213512976
Breakfast, N., Bradshaw, G., & Nomarwayi, T. (2019). Violent service delivery protests in post-apartheid South Africa, 1994–2017—a conflict resolution perspective. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(1), 106–126. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1563b64637
DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X16000793
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.002
Brown, D., McGranahan, G., & Dodman, D. (2014). Urban informality and building a more inclusive, resilient and green economy. International Institute for Environment and Development. http://pubs.iied.org/16574IIED
Chokoe, R., & Meso, K. K. (2017). Urban governance and the brown environmental problems in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(5), 168–178. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-6a0f77939
DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2017.1345641
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.011
DOI: 10.1177/0032329213483110
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112402
DOI: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2007.00044.x
DOI: 10.4236/jis.2018.92010
DOI: 10.1093/es/khn083
DOI: 10.1080/02589001.2017.1326698
DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v2i1.45
DOI: 10.1080/02589346.2016.1160858
DOI: 10.18775/ijom.2757-0509.2020.11.4001
DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2024.2329388
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.001
Koma, S. B. (2010). The state of local government in South Africa: Issues, trends and options. Journal of Public Administration, 45(si-1), 111–120. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC51773
Koma, S. B. (2013). The trajectory of economic development policies in South Africa. Administratio Publica, 21(1), 142–160. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-adminpub-v21-n1-a9
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjk2x23
DOI: 10.21511/ppm.14(3-1).2016.03
Maake, M. T. (2016). An analysis on Integrated Development Planning: A case study of Mopani District Municipality. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Makgamatha, M. G., & Meso, K. K. (2018, July 4–6). Contemporary second economy and business contestations in South Africa. In International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives, Stellenbosch University, Saldanha Bay, South Africa.
Mamabolo, M. E. (2017). The impact of the implementation of government policy on the spatial distribution of emerging farmers in the Mopani district in the Limpopo province of South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa).
Manyaka, R. K., & Madzivhandila, T. S. (2013, August). Conceptualisation of Integrated Development Planning. In Conference Proceedings published by the South African Association of Public Administration and Management (SPAM). Department of Public Administration & Management, Tshwane University of Technology.
Meso, K. K., & Manamela, M. G. (2015). Analysis of micro-enterprises and their contributions towards income poverty reduction in South Africa. In The xenophobic attacks in South Africa: Reflections and possible strategies to ward them off (p. 549). http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10386/1478/saapam_4th%20annual_2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#page=556
Meso, K. K., Manamela, M. G., & Maake, M. S. (2016). Rural-urban nexus: Controversies and policy imperatives in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 51(1), 104–114. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC192814
DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v9i1.341
DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2019.1622210
DOI: 10.1057/s41301-017-0065-1
DOI: 10.4337/9781781008058.00013
Moyo, T., & Mamobolo, M. (2014). The National Development Plan (NDP): A comparative analysis with the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP), the Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) programme and the Accelerated and Shared-Growth Initiative (ASGISA). Journal of Public Administration, 49(3), 946–959. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC164758
DOI: 10.1080/02589346.2015.1104466
National Planning Commission. (2013). National development plan vision 2030.
Ndebele, C., & Lavhelani, P. N. (2017). Local government and quality service delivery: An evaluation of municipal service delivery in a local municipality in Limpopo Province. Journal of Public Administration, 52(2), 340–356. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-bf4ce318a
Ndhambi, S. (2015). The politics of South Africa’s macro-economic policy: A critical study of Growth, Employment and Redistribution strategy (GEAR) 1996–2010 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Limpopo).
DOI: 10.1111/joac.12170
Ramutsheli, M. P., & Janse van Rensburg, J. O. (2015). The root causes for local government's failure to achieve objectives. Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, 17(2), 107–118. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC181710
DOI: 10.4102/td.v12i1.337
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i45/117678
DOI: 10.20525/ijfbs.v13i2.3282
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bep025
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01162.x